Murata G, Cho S I
Transplantation. 1978 May;25(5):244-5. doi: 10.1097/00007890-197805000-00004.
From July 1972 to September 1976, 708 kidneys received through the Interhospital Organ Bank, New England were divided into two groups. Both groups were preserved by continuous pulsatile perfusion. Group 1 (308 kidneys) was maintained at a systolic pressure of 60 mm Hg throughout the preservation period. Group 2 (399 kidneys) was perfused at an initial pressure of 60 mm Hg. The pressure was adjusted to 55 mm Hg at 1 hr, then no further adjustments were made. Comparison reveals that group 2 donors were younger and that the kidneys in group 2 were preserved for longer periods that those in group 1. Both groups had an equivalent number of kidneys that were discarded and kidneys that did not function. The incidence of immediate function was higher in group 2 but this difference is not statistically significant. Compared with conventional preservation, kidneys can be preserved at lower systolic and mean pressures without loss of quality, and in fact, may suffer less damage from perfusion.
1972年7月至1976年9月,通过新英格兰医院间器官库接收的708个肾脏被分为两组。两组均通过持续搏动灌注进行保存。第一组(308个肾脏)在整个保存期内收缩压维持在60 mmHg。第二组(399个肾脏)初始灌注压力为60 mmHg,1小时后压力调整为55 mmHg,之后不再进行调整。比较发现,第二组供体更年轻,且第二组肾脏的保存时间比第一组长。两组中被丢弃的肾脏数量和无功能的肾脏数量相当。第二组立即发挥功能的发生率更高,但这种差异无统计学意义。与传统保存方法相比,肾脏可以在较低的收缩压和平均压力下保存而不损失质量,实际上,灌注造成的损伤可能更小。