• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根据美国国家糖尿病数据组(National Diabetes Data Group)标准到 Carpenter 和 Coustan 标准的变化,对双胎妊娠中妊娠期糖尿病的产科和新生儿结局:一项回顾性队列研究。

Obstetric and neonatal outcomes of gestational diabetes mellitus in twin pregnancies according to changes in its diagnostic criteria from National Diabetes Data Group criteria to Carpenter and Coustan criteria: a retrospective cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Korea.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Jan 3;22(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04361-9.

DOI:10.1186/s12884-021-04361-9
PMID:34979991
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8722060/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To compare obstetric and neonatal outcomes in twin pregnancies with or without gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) before and after changes in GDM diagnostic criteria.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of 1,764 twin pregnancies including 130 women with GDM (GDM group) and 1,634 women without GDM (non-GDM group). Patients with pregestational diabetes, unknown GDM status, and fetal death at < 24 gestational weeks were excluded. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes were compared between the two groups by two periods: period 1 (1995-2005) and period 2 (2005-2018) when National Diabetes Data Group criteria and Carpenter and Coustan criteria were used for diagnosis of GDM, respectively.

RESULTS

The incidence of GDM in twin pregnancies increased from 4.0% in period 1 to 9.3% in period 2. Composite obstetric complications rate was significantly higher in the GDM group than that in the non-GDM group during period 1 (72.0% vs. 45.5%, P = 0.009). However, it became comparable during period 2 (60.0% vs. 57.4%, P = 0.601). Interaction between GDM and period indicated a significant differential effect of GDM by period on the rate of composite obstetric complications. The rate of composite neonatal complications was similar between the two groups during both periods. The interaction between GDM and period was not significant.

CONCLUSION

After changes of GDM diagnostic criteria, the incidence of GDM increased more than twice, and the rate of composite obstetric complications decreased, but the rate of composite neonatal complications did not change significantly.

摘要

背景

比较妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)诊断标准改变前后,有无 GDM 的双胎妊娠的产科和新生儿结局。

方法

这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了 1764 例双胎妊娠,包括 130 例 GDM 患者(GDM 组)和 1634 例无 GDM 患者(非 GDM 组)。排除孕前糖尿病、GDM 状态未知和孕 24 周前胎儿死亡的患者。比较两组在两个时期的产科和新生儿结局:分别使用美国国家糖尿病数据组(National Diabetes Data Group)标准和 Carpenter 和 Coustan 标准诊断 GDM 的时期 1(1995-2005 年)和时期 2(2005-2018 年)。

结果

双胎妊娠 GDM 的发生率从时期 1 的 4.0%增加到时期 2 的 9.3%。时期 1 时,GDM 组的复合产科并发症发生率明显高于非 GDM 组(72.0% vs. 45.5%,P=0.009)。然而,在时期 2 时,两组间无显著差异(60.0% vs. 57.4%,P=0.601)。GDM 和时期之间的交互作用表明,GDM 对复合产科并发症发生率的影响在时期间存在显著差异。两个时期两组间复合新生儿并发症发生率相似。GDM 和时期之间的交互作用不显著。

结论

GDM 诊断标准改变后,GDM 的发生率增加了两倍多,复合产科并发症发生率降低,但复合新生儿并发症发生率无明显变化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4293/8722060/0ef3721e955c/12884_2021_4361_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4293/8722060/0ef3721e955c/12884_2021_4361_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4293/8722060/0ef3721e955c/12884_2021_4361_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Obstetric and neonatal outcomes of gestational diabetes mellitus in twin pregnancies according to changes in its diagnostic criteria from National Diabetes Data Group criteria to Carpenter and Coustan criteria: a retrospective cohort study.根据美国国家糖尿病数据组(National Diabetes Data Group)标准到 Carpenter 和 Coustan 标准的变化,对双胎妊娠中妊娠期糖尿病的产科和新生儿结局:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Jan 3;22(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04361-9.
2
Perinatal outcomes associated with the diagnosis of gestational diabetes made by the international association of the diabetes and pregnancy study groups criteria.根据国际糖尿病与妊娠研究组协会标准诊断的妊娠期糖尿病的围产期结局
Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Sep;124(3):571-578. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000412.
3
Screening and diagnosing gestational diabetes mellitus.妊娠期糖尿病的筛查与诊断
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2012 Oct(210):1-327.
4
Use of the National Diabetes Data Group and the Carpenter-Coustan criteria for assessing gestational diabetes mellitus and risk of adverse pregnancy outcome.使用国家糖尿病数据组及卡彭特-库斯坦标准评估妊娠期糖尿病及不良妊娠结局风险。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Aug 17;16:231. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-1030-9.
5
Pregnancy Outcomes of Women Additionally Diagnosed as Gestational Diabetes by the International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Criteria.国际糖尿病与妊娠研究组标准诊断为妊娠期糖尿病的女性的妊娠结局。
Diabetes Metab J. 2019 Dec;43(6):766-775. doi: 10.4093/dmj.2018.0192. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
6
Pregnancy outcome in women with gestational diabetes mellitus according to the Carpenter-Coustan criteria in Thailand.根据泰国Carpenter-Coustan标准,患有妊娠期糖尿病的女性的妊娠结局
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2015 Sep;41(9):1345-51. doi: 10.1111/jog.12727. Epub 2015 Jun 26.
7
Perinatal Outcomes of Twin Gestations with and without Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.妊娠期糖尿病与非妊娠期糖尿病双胎妊娠的围产结局。
Am J Perinatol. 2024 Apr;41(5):628-634. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1743184. Epub 2022 Feb 21.
8
Pregnancy outcomes of Taiwanese women with gestational diabetes mellitus: a comparison of Carpenter-Coustan and National Diabetes Data Group criteria.台湾妊娠糖尿病妇女的妊娠结局:Carpenter-Coustan 与国家糖尿病数据组标准的比较。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2010 May;19(5):935-9. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2009.1620.
9
Carpenter-Coustan criteria compared with the national diabetes data group thresholds for gestational diabetes mellitus.卡彭特-库斯坦标准与美国国家糖尿病数据组妊娠期糖尿病阈值的比较。
Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Aug;114(2 Pt 1):326-332. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181ae8d85.
10
Maternal and Neonatal Morbidity for Women Who Would Be Added to the Diagnosis of GDM Using IADPSG Criteria: A Secondary Analysis of the Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome Study.采用国际糖尿病与妊娠研究组(IADPSG)标准诊断妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)的女性的孕产妇和新生儿发病率:高血糖与不良妊娠结局研究的二次分析
Diabetes Care. 2016 Dec;39(12):2204-2210. doi: 10.2337/dc16-1194. Epub 2016 Sep 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Gestational diabetes mellitus and risk of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.妊娠期糖尿病与新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的风险:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2024 Dec 5;16(1):294. doi: 10.1186/s13098-024-01539-x.
2
Association of DPP-4 Concentrations with the Occurrence of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Excessive Gestational Weight Gain.DPP-4 浓度与妊娠期糖尿病和妊娠体重过度增加的发生的关系。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Feb 2;25(3):1829. doi: 10.3390/ijms25031829.

本文引用的文献

1
Gestational diabetes in Korea: Temporal trends in prevalence, treatment, and short-term consequences from a national health insurance claims database between 2012 and 2016.韩国的妊娠期糖尿病:2012 年至 2016 年国家健康保险索赔数据库中患病率、治疗和短期后果的时间趋势。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2021 Jan;171:108586. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108586. Epub 2020 Dec 13.
2
Changes in the perinatal outcomes of twin pregnancies delivered at a tertiary referral center in Korea during a 24-year period from 1995 to 2018.1995年至2018年期间,韩国一家三级转诊中心双胎妊娠围产期结局的变化。
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2020 May;63(3):251-260. doi: 10.5468/ogs.2020.63.3.251. Epub 2020 Mar 24.
3
Risk Factors and Outcomes of Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes in a Cohort of 6968 Pregnant Women Prospectively Recruited.
对6968名前瞻性招募的孕妇进行队列研究,探讨胎膜早破的危险因素及结局。
J Clin Med. 2019 Nov 15;8(11):1987. doi: 10.3390/jcm8111987.
4
Advanced Maternal Age: Adverse Outcomes of Pregnancy, A Meta-Analysis.高龄孕产妇:妊娠不良结局的荟萃分析
Acta Med Port. 2019 Mar 29;32(3):219-226. doi: 10.20344/amp.11057.
5
Perinatal outcome of twin pregnancies according to maternal age.根据母亲年龄的双胎妊娠围产期结局
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2019 Mar;62(2):93-102. doi: 10.5468/ogs.2019.62.2.93. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
6
Does Gestational Diabetes Cause Additional Risk in Twin Pregnancy?妊娠期糖尿病会增加双胎妊娠的额外风险吗?
Twin Res Hum Genet. 2019 Feb;22(1):62-69. doi: 10.1017/thg.2018.72. Epub 2019 Jan 21.
7
Incidence and risk factors of preterm premature rupture of membranes in singleton pregnancies at Siriraj Hospital.诗里拉吉医院单胎妊娠早产胎膜早破的发病率及危险因素
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2019 Mar;45(3):573-577. doi: 10.1111/jog.13886. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
8
Relationship between advanced glycation end products and gestational diabetes mellitus.晚期糖基化终末产物与妊娠期糖尿病之间的关系。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019 Sep;32(17):2783-2789. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1449201. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
9
ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 190: Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.美国妇产科医师学会临床实践通告第 190 号:妊娠期糖尿病。
Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Feb;131(2):e49-e64. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002501.
10
Screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus - relevance to low and middle income countries.妊娠期糖尿病的筛查与诊断——对低收入和中等收入国家的意义
Clin Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016 Jun 1;2:13. doi: 10.1186/s40842-016-0031-y. eCollection 2016.