School of Psychology, Faculty of Education, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
Department of Applied Psychology, School of Psychiatry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Aggress Behav. 2022 May;48(3):319-330. doi: 10.1002/ab.22016. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
Based on different functions of aggression, the conceptual distinction of reactive and proactive aggression has been proposed. It is widely acknowledged that adolescents' violence exposure contributes to later perpetration of aggressive behaviors. However, few studies have compared the effects of violence exposure on reactive/proactive aggression based on the forms (i.e., witnessing and being victimized) and the contexts (i.e., family, community, and school), especially in preadolescents. Thus, the relationship between two forms of violence exposure (witnessing and victimization) and later perpetrating reactive and proactive aggression were compared within and across three social contexts in a sample of Chinese preadolescents. Participants were 609 preadolescents 51.9% boys) recruited from five primary schools in China. Information on two forms of violence exposure across multiple contexts and demography were collected at Time 1 (M = 10.65), and aggression data (i.e., reactive and proactive aggression) were collected a year later at Time 2. Results evidenced witnessing and being victimized by violence in the home were more consistently related to later perpetration of reactive and proactive aggression. Witnessing family violence was significantly associated with later perpetration of reactive aggression than witnessing violence in the community. Being victimized by violence in the community and the home were significantly associated with later perpetration of proactive aggression than school victimization. These findings provide a deeper understanding of the roles of both types of violence exposure across contexts in later perpetration of aggression during early adolescence.
基于攻击行为的不同功能,人们提出了反应性攻击和主动性攻击的概念区分。人们普遍认为,青少年的暴力暴露会导致他们以后更有可能实施攻击行为。然而,很少有研究比较基于形式(即目击和受害)和背景(即家庭、社区和学校)的暴力暴露对反应性/主动性攻击的影响,尤其是在青春期前。因此,在一项中国青春期前儿童样本中,比较了两种形式的暴力暴露(目击和受害)与以后实施反应性和主动性攻击之间的关系,分别在三个社会背景内和跨社会背景进行了比较。参与者是来自中国五所小学的 609 名青春期前儿童(51.9%为男孩)。在第一次(M = 10.65)时收集了关于多个背景和人口统计学的两种形式的暴力暴露的信息,一年后在第二次收集了攻击数据(即反应性和主动性攻击)。结果表明,家庭中目击和受害暴力与以后实施反应性和主动性攻击更密切相关。目击家庭暴力与以后实施反应性攻击显著相关,而目击社区暴力则没有。社区和家庭中受害暴力与以后实施主动性攻击显著相关,而学校受害则没有。这些发现为理解在青春期早期,两种类型的跨背景暴力暴露在以后实施攻击行为中的作用提供了更深入的认识。