Alsultan Mohammad, Obeid Ameer, Alsamarrai Omar, Anan Mohamed Taher, Bakr Aliaa, Soliman Nawwar, Kurdy Mamdoh, Mosa Muhannad Hag, Saleh Zain, Hujij Fatima, Barhoum Jafar
Department of Nephrology, Al Assad and Al Mouwasat University Hospitals, Damascus, Syria.
Department of Infectious Diseases, Al Assad and Al Mouwasat University Hospitals, Damascus, Syria.
Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis. 2021 Dec 31;2021:2129006. doi: 10.1155/2021/2129006. eCollection 2021.
COVID-19 was reported in China in 2019 and has spread worldwide. Transmission occurs through respiratory secretions and, less commonly, through contaminated surfaces. The severity of the disease can range from asymptomatic to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). In this study, we aim to investigate the efficacy of two agents (oral colchicine and budesonide inhaler) in COVID-19 infection management, compared with supportive care alone. 77 patients were admitted to the isolation section of Al Assad University Hospital, between the 1 of August and the 30 of August. A total of 49 patients were included in this randomized control trial, after excluding ineligible patients. The random sample was divided into three groups; the first group was supportive care plus colchicine, the second group was supportive care plus budesonide inhaler, and the control group was supportive care alone. PaO2/FiO2 was improved in the budesonide group, higher than the supportive and colchicine groups. The median hospitalization days were shorter when using colchicine or budesonide, opposed to supportive care alone (8 vs 10 days, respectively). 34 patients (69.3%) were discharged, and 27 patients (55.1%) were followed up until they were weaned from oxygen and made a complete recovery. There was a significant decrease in mortality with colchicine (3 patients; 21.4%) compared with supportive care (7 patients; 33.3%) and the budesonide group (5 patients; 35.7%).
2019年中国报告了新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19),该疾病已在全球范围内传播。传播途径为呼吸道分泌物,较少情况下通过受污染的表面传播。疾病严重程度从无症状到急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)不等。在本研究中,我们旨在调查两种药物(口服秋水仙碱和布地奈德吸入器)在COVID-19感染管理中的疗效,并与单纯支持治疗进行比较。8月1日至8月30日期间,77名患者被收治到阿萨德大学医院隔离区。在排除不符合条件的患者后,共有49名患者纳入了这项随机对照试验。随机样本分为三组;第一组为支持治疗加秋水仙碱,第二组为支持治疗加布地奈德吸入器,对照组为单纯支持治疗。布地奈德组的动脉血氧分压/吸入氧分数值(PaO2/FiO2)有所改善,高于支持治疗组和秋水仙碱组。使用秋水仙碱或布地奈德时,中位住院天数比单纯支持治疗短(分别为8天和10天)。34名患者(69.3%)出院,27名患者(55.1%)接受随访,直至脱机并完全康复。与支持治疗组(7例;33.3%)和布地奈德组(5例;35.7%)相比,秋水仙碱组的死亡率显著降低(3例;21.4%)。