Department of Neurology, Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Department of Neurological Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Ann Neurol. 2022 Mar;91(3):424-435. doi: 10.1002/ana.26302. Epub 2022 Jan 25.
This study was undertaken to compare the rate of change in cognition between glucocerebrosidase (GBA) mutation carriers and noncarriers with and without subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) in Parkinson disease.
Clinical and genetic data from 12 datasets were examined. Global cognition was assessed using the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale (MDRS). Subjects were examined for mutations in GBA and categorized as GBA carriers with or without DBS (GBA+DBS+, GBA+DBS-), and noncarriers with or without DBS (GBA-DBS+, GBA-DBS-). GBA mutation carriers were subcategorized according to mutation severity (risk variant, mild, severe). Linear mixed modeling was used to compare rate of change in MDRS scores over time among the groups according to GBA and DBS status and then according to GBA severity and DBS status.
Data were available for 366 subjects (58 GBA+DBS+, 82 GBA+DBS-, 98 GBA-DBS+, and 128 GBA-DBS- subjects), who were longitudinally followed (range = 36-60 months after surgery). Using the MDRS, GBA+DBS+ subjects declined on average 2.02 points/yr more than GBA-DBS- subjects (95% confidence interval [CI] = -2.35 to -1.69), 1.71 points/yr more than GBA+DBS- subjects (95% CI = -2.14 to -1.28), and 1.49 points/yr more than GBA-DBS+ subjects (95% CI = -1.80 to -1.18).
Although not randomized, this composite analysis suggests that the combined effects of GBA mutations and STN-DBS negatively impact cognition. We advise that DBS candidates be screened for GBA mutations as part of the presurgical decision-making process. We advise that GBA mutation carriers be counseled regarding potential risks associated with STN-DBS so that alternative options may be considered. ANN NEUROL 2022;91:424-435.
本研究旨在比较伴有和不伴有丘脑底核深部脑刺激(STN-DBS)的葡萄糖脑苷脂酶(GBA)突变携带者与非携带者认知变化率。
对 12 个数据集的临床和遗传数据进行了检查。使用 Mattis 痴呆评定量表(MDRS)评估整体认知。对 GBA 基因突变进行检查,并分为伴有或不伴有 DBS 的 GBA 携带者(GBA+DBS+、GBA+DBS-)和伴有或不伴有 DBS 的非携带者(GBA-DBS+、GBA-DBS-)。根据突变严重程度(风险变异、轻度、重度)对 GBA 突变携带者进行亚分类。使用线性混合模型比较各组根据 GBA 和 DBS 状态以及根据 GBA 严重程度和 DBS 状态的 MDRS 评分随时间的变化率。
共有 366 名受试者(58 名 GBA+DBS+、82 名 GBA+DBS-、98 名 GBA-DBS+和 128 名 GBA-DBS-)的数据可用,他们接受了(手术后 36-60 个月)纵向随访。使用 MDRS,GBA+DBS+组比 GBA-DBS-组平均每年下降 2.02 分(95%置信区间[CI]:-2.35 至-1.69),比 GBA+DBS-组每年下降 1.71 分(95%CI:-2.14 至-1.28),比 GBA-DBS+组每年下降 1.49 分(95%CI:-1.80 至-1.18)。
尽管不是随机的,但这项综合分析表明,GBA 突变和 STN-DBS 的联合作用对认知产生负面影响。我们建议在进行术前决策过程中,对 DBS 候选者进行 GBA 突变筛查。我们建议向 GBA 突变携带者提供与 STN-DBS 相关的潜在风险咨询,以便考虑替代方案。神经病学年鉴 2022;91:424-435。