Westenberger Ana, Skrahina Volha, Usnich Tatiana, Beetz Christian, Vollstedt Eva-Juliane, Laabs Björn-Hergen, Paul Jefri J, Curado Filipa, Skobalj Snezana, Gaber Hanaa, Olmedillas Maria, Bogdanovic Xenia, Ameziane Najim, Schell Nathalie, Aasly Jan Olav, Afshari Mitra, Agarwal Pinky, Aldred Jason, Alonso-Frech Fernando, Anderson Roderick, Araújo Rui, Arkadir David, Avenali Micol, Balal Mehmet, Benizri Sandra, Bette Sagari, Bhatia Perminder, Bonello Michael, Braga-Neto Pedro, Brauneis Sarah, Cardoso Francisco Eduardo Costa, Cavallieri Francesco, Classen Joseph, Cohen Lisa, Coletta Della, Crosiers David, Cullufi Paskal, Dashtipour Khashayar, Demirkiran Meltem, de Carvalho Aguiar Patricia, De Rosa Anna, Djaldetti Ruth, Dogu Okan, Dos Santos Ghilardi Maria Gabriela, Eggers Carsten, Elibol Bulent, Ellenbogen Aaron, Ertan Sibel, Fabiani Giorgio, Falkenburger Björn H, Farrow Simon, Fay-Karmon Tsviya, Ferencz Gerald J, Fonoff Erich Talamoni, Fragoso Yara Dadalti, Genç Gençer, Gorospe Arantza, Grandas Francisco, Gruber Doreen, Gudesblatt Mark, Gurevich Tanya, Hagenah Johann, Hanagasi Hasmet A, Hassin-Baer Sharon, Hauser Robert A, Hernández-Vara Jorge, Herting Birgit, Hinson Vanessa K, Hogg Elliot, Hu Michele T, Hummelgen Eduardo, Hussey Kelly, Infante Jon, Isaacson Stuart H, Jauma Serge, Koleva-Alazeh Natalia, Kuhlenbäumer Gregor, Kühn Andrea, Litvan Irene, López-Manzanares Lydia, Luxmore McKenzie, Manandhar Sujeena, Marcaud Veronique, Markopoulou Katerina, Marras Connie, McKenzie Mark, Matarazzo Michele, Merello Marcelo, Mollenhauer Brit, Morgan John C, Mullin Stephen, Musacchio Thomas, Myers Bennett, Negrotti Anna, Nieves Anette, Nitsan Zeev, Oskooilar Nader, Öztop-Çakmak Özgür, Pal Gian, Pavese Nicola, Percesepe Antonio, Piccoli Tommaso, Pinto de Souza Carolina, Prell Tino, Pulera Mark, Raw Jason, Reetz Kathrin, Reiner Johnathan, Rosenberg David, Ruiz-Lopez Marta, Ruiz Martinez Javier, Sammler Esther, Santos-Lobato Bruno Lopes, Saunders-Pullman Rachel, Schlesinger Ilana, Schofield Christine M, Schumacher-Schuh Artur F, Scott Burton, Sesar Ángel, Shafer Stuart J, Sheridan Ray, Silverdale Monty, Sophia Rani, Spitz Mariana, Stathis Pantelis, Stocchi Fabrizio, Tagliati Michele, Tai Yen F, Terwecoren Annelies, Thonke Sven, Tönges Lars, Toschi Giulia, Tumas Vitor, Urban Peter Paul, Vacca Laura, Vandenberghe Wim, Valente Enza Maria, Valzania Franco, Vela-Desojo Lydia, Weill Caroline, Weise David, Wojcieszek Joanne, Wolz Martin, Yahalom Gilad, Yalcin-Cakmakli Gul, Zittel Simone, Zlotnik Yair, Kandaswamy Krishna K, Balck Alexander, Hanssen Henrike, Borsche Max, Lange Lara M, Csoti Ilona, Lohmann Katja, Kasten Meike, Brüggemann Norbert, Rolfs Arndt, Klein Christine, Bauer Peter
Institute of Neurogenetics, University of Lübeck, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, 23538 Lübeck, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany.
CENTOGENE GmbH, 18055 Rostock, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Germany.
Brain. 2024 Aug 1;147(8):2652-2667. doi: 10.1093/brain/awae188.
Estimates of the spectrum and frequency of pathogenic variants in Parkinson's disease (PD) in different populations are currently limited and biased. Furthermore, although therapeutic modification of several genetic targets has reached the clinical trial stage, a major obstacle in conducting these trials is that PD patients are largely unaware of their genetic status and, therefore, cannot be recruited. Expanding the number of investigated PD-related genes and including genes related to disorders with overlapping clinical features in large, well-phenotyped PD patient groups is a prerequisite for capturing the full variant spectrum underlying PD and for stratifying and prioritizing patients for gene-targeted clinical trials. The Rostock Parkinson's disease (ROPAD) study is an observational clinical study aiming to determine the frequency and spectrum of genetic variants contributing to PD in a large international cohort. We investigated variants in 50 genes with either an established relevance for PD or possible phenotypic overlap in a group of 12 580 PD patients from 16 countries [62.3% male; 92.0% White; 27.0% positive family history (FH+), median age at onset (AAO) 59 years] using a next-generation sequencing panel. Altogether, in 1864 (14.8%) ROPAD participants (58.1% male; 91.0% White, 35.5% FH+, median AAO 55 years), a PD-relevant genetic test (PDGT) was positive based on GBA1 risk variants (10.4%) or pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in LRRK2 (2.9%), PRKN (0.9%), SNCA (0.2%) or PINK1 (0.1%) or a combination of two genetic findings in two genes (∼0.2%). Of note, the adjusted positive PDGT fraction, i.e. the fraction of positive PDGTs per country weighted by the fraction of the population of the world that they represent, was 14.5%. Positive PDGTs were identified in 19.9% of patients with an AAO ≤ 50 years, in 19.5% of patients with FH+ and in 26.9% with an AAO ≤ 50 years and FH+. In comparison to the idiopathic PD group (6846 patients with benign variants), the positive PDGT group had a significantly lower AAO (4 years, P = 9 × 10-34). The probability of a positive PDGT decreased by 3% with every additional AAO year (P = 1 × 10-35). Female patients were 22% more likely to have a positive PDGT (P = 3 × 10-4), and for individuals with FH+ this likelihood was 55% higher (P = 1 × 10-14). About 0.8% of the ROPAD participants had positive genetic testing findings in parkinsonism-, dystonia/dyskinesia- or dementia-related genes. In the emerging era of gene-targeted PD clinical trials, our finding that ∼15% of patients harbour potentially actionable genetic variants offers an important prospect to affected individuals and their families and underlines the need for genetic testing in PD patients. Thus, the insights from the ROPAD study allow for data-driven, differential genetic counselling across the spectrum of different AAOs and family histories and promote a possible policy change in the application of genetic testing as a routine part of patient evaluation and care in PD.
目前,不同人群中帕金森病(PD)致病变异的频谱和频率估计有限且存在偏差。此外,尽管针对多个基因靶点的治疗性干预已进入临床试验阶段,但开展这些试验的一个主要障碍是,PD患者大多不清楚自己的基因状况,因此无法被招募。在大规模、表型明确的PD患者群体中增加被研究的PD相关基因数量,并纳入与具有重叠临床特征的疾病相关的基因,是全面了解PD潜在变异频谱以及对患者进行分层和确定基因靶向临床试验优先级的前提条件。罗斯托克帕金森病(ROPAD)研究是一项观察性临床研究,旨在确定一个大型国际队列中导致PD的基因变异的频率和频谱。我们使用二代测序panel对来自16个国家的12580名PD患者(男性占62.3%;白人占92.0%;27.0%有阳性家族史(FH+),发病年龄中位数(AAO)为59岁)的50个与PD已确定相关或可能存在表型重叠的基因中的变异进行了研究。总体而言,在1864名(14.8%)ROPAD参与者(男性占58.1%;白人占91.0%,FH+占35.5%,AAO中位数为55岁)中,基于GBA1风险变异(10.4%)或LRRK2(2.9%)、PRKN(0.9%)、SNCA(0.2%)或PINK1(0.1%)中的致病/可能致病变异,或两个基因中的两种基因检测结果组合(约0.2%),与PD相关的基因检测(PDGT)呈阳性。值得注意的是,调整后的PDGT阳性比例,即每个国家的PDGT阳性比例按其所代表的世界人口比例加权后为14.5%。在发病年龄≤50岁的患者中,19.9%的患者PDGT呈阳性;在有FH+的患者中,19.5%的患者PDGT呈阳性;在发病年龄≤50岁且有FH+的患者中,26.9%的患者PDGT呈阳性。与特发性PD组(6846例有良性变异的患者)相比,PDGT阳性组的AAO显著更低(低4岁,P = 9×10⁻³⁴)。每增加一岁AAO,PDGT呈阳性的概率降低3%(P = 1×10⁻³⁵)。女性患者PDGT呈阳性的可能性高22%(P = 3×10⁻⁴),对于有FH+的个体,这种可能性高55%(P = 1×10⁻¹⁴)。约0.8%的ROPAD参与者在帕金森综合征、肌张力障碍/运动障碍或痴呆相关基因的基因检测中呈阳性。在基因靶向PD临床试验的新时代,我们发现约15%的患者携带潜在可采取行动的基因变异,这为受影响的个体及其家庭提供了重要前景,并强调了对PD患者进行基因检测的必要性。因此,ROPAD研究的见解有助于在不同AAO和家族史范围内进行数据驱动的差异化遗传咨询,并推动在将基因检测作为PD患者评估和护理常规部分的应用方面可能的政策变革。