Centre for Depression and Suicide Studies, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
J Clin Psychiatry. 2022 Jan 4;83(1):21r13870. doi: 10.4088/JCP.21r13870.
To determine the objective neurocognitive effects of (1) single-dose ketamine, (2) repeated-dose ketamine, (3) ketamine adjunct to electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), and (4) ketamine as the anesthetic for ECT in major depressive disorder (MDD) and depression in bipolar disorder (BD). Cochrane, MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO databases were searched on March 19, 2020 (updated July 2, 2020), using the terms terms and and their synonyms. Clinical trial registries (search date May 4, 2020) and reference sections of included articles were also searched. There was no restriction on language or year of publication. Of 4,035 identified articles, 17 met inclusion criteria. Controlled and open-label studies of adults who received at least 1 ketamine treatment for a current major depressive episode, as part of MDD or BD, were included. Only studies measuring cognition using at least 1 validated, objective neurocognitive assessment were eligible. Results are presented using a narrative review format. Data regarding change in cognitive performance from baseline to end-of-treatment and/or differences in cognition between ketamine and control groups were extracted. There were no negative effects of single- or repeated-dose intravenous ketamine up to 2 weeks post-treatment in MDD. Limited data were available for BD populations, as well as on other routes of ketamine administration. Data to definitively answer the question of whether ketamine has substantive or persistent cognitive effects are insufficient; thus, larger controlled trials measuring cognition as the primary outcome are needed. Future research should focus on different routes of ketamine administration, ketamine enantiomers, and BD populations.
确定(1)单次剂量氯胺酮、(2)重复剂量氯胺酮、(3)氯胺酮辅助电惊厥疗法(ECT)和(4)氯胺酮作为ECT 麻醉在重度抑郁症(MDD)和双相情感障碍(BD)中抑郁的客观神经认知影响。2020 年 3 月 19 日(更新于 2020 年 7 月 2 日),在 Cochrane、MEDLINE、Embase 和 PsycINFO 数据库中使用术语和及其同义词进行检索。还检索了临床试验注册处(搜索日期为 2020 年 5 月 4 日)和纳入文章的参考文献部分。未对语言或出版年份进行限制。在 4035 篇确定的文章中,有 17 篇符合纳入标准。纳入了接受至少 1 次氯胺酮治疗当前重度抑郁发作的成人的对照和开放标签研究,这些患者是 MDD 或 BD 的一部分。只有使用至少 1 种经过验证的客观神经认知评估来测量认知的研究才符合条件。结果采用叙述性综述格式呈现。从基线到治疗结束时提取有关认知表现变化的数据,以及在氯胺酮和对照组之间的认知差异数据。在 MDD 中,单次或重复静脉内氯胺酮治疗后 2 周内没有出现负面认知影响。BD 人群以及其他氯胺酮给药途径的数据有限。目前还没有足够的数据来明确回答氯胺酮是否具有实质性或持久性认知影响的问题;因此,需要更大规模的以认知为主要结局的对照试验。未来的研究应侧重于不同的氯胺酮给药途径、氯胺酮对映体和 BD 人群。