Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Clermont-Ferrand, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) 1405, Centre d'Investigation Clinique 1405, Platform of Clinical Investigation, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Direction de la Recherche Clinique et de l'Innovation, Biostatistics Unit, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 May 1;6(5):e2314406. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.14406.
Repeated ketamine administration is common in treatment-refractory chronic pain, but ketamine analgesic and antidepressant effects are poorly understood in patients with chronic pain with depression symptoms.
To determine clinical pain trajectories with repeated ketamine administrations, exploring whether ketamine dose and/or pretreatment depressive and/or anxiety symptoms may mediate pain relief.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This nationwide, multicenter, prospective cohort study included patients in France with treatment-refractory chronic pain who received repeated ketamine administration, over 1 year, according to ketamine use in their pain clinic. Data were collected from July 7, 2016, through September 21, 2017. Linear mixed models for repeated data, trajectory analysis, and mediation analysis were performed from November 15 to December 31, 2022.
Ketamine administration in cumulative dose (milligrams) over 1 year.
Primary outcome was mean pain intensity (0-10 on the Numerical Pain Rating Scale [NPRS]), assessed every month for 1 year by telephone, after inclusion in the hospital. Depression and anxiety (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [HADS]), quality of life (12-item Short Form Health Survey [SF-12]), cumulative ketamine dose, adverse effects, and concomitant treatments were secondary outcomes.
A total of 329 patients (mean [SD] age, 51.4 [11.0] years; 249 women [75.7%] and 80 men [24.3%]) were enrolled. Repeated ketamine administration was associated with a decrease of NPRS (effect size = -0.52 [95% CI, -0.62 to -0.41]; P < .001) and an increase of SF-12 mental health (39.7 [10.9] to 42.2 [11.1]; P < .001) and physical health (28.5 [7.9] to 29.5 [9.2]; P = .02) dimension scores over 1 year. Adverse effects were in the normal range. There was a significant difference between patients without and with depressive symptoms in pain diminution (regression coefficient, -0.04 [95% CI, -0.06 to -0.01]; omnibus P = .002 for interaction of time × baseline depression [HADS score ≤7 or >7]). The mediation model showed that ketamine dose was not associated with pain diminution (r = 0.01; P = .61) and not correlated with depression (r = -0.06; P = .32), and that depression was associated with pain diminution (regression coefficient, 0.03 [95% CI, 0.01-0.04]; P < .001), whereas ketamine dose was not (regression coefficient, 0.00 [95% CI, -0.01 to 0.01]; P = .67). The proportion of reduction of pain mediated by baseline depression was 64.6%.
The findings of this cohort study on chronic refractory pain suggest that depression (and not ketamine dose or anxiety) was the mediator of the association of ketamine with pain diminution. This finding provides radically new insights on how ketamine reduces pain primarily by dampening depression. This reinforces the need for systematic holistic assessment of patients with chronic pain to diagnose severe depressive symptoms where ketamine would be a very valuable therapeutic option.
在治疗难治性慢性疼痛中,反复给予氯胺酮很常见,但氯胺酮的镇痛和抗抑郁作用在伴有抑郁症状的慢性疼痛患者中了解甚少。
确定反复给予氯胺酮后临床疼痛轨迹,探讨氯胺酮剂量和/或治疗前抑郁和/或焦虑症状是否可能介导疼痛缓解。
设计、地点和参与者:这项全国性、多中心、前瞻性队列研究纳入了法国治疗难治性慢性疼痛的患者,他们根据疼痛诊所的氯胺酮使用情况,在 1 年内接受重复氯胺酮给药。数据于 2016 年 7 月 7 日至 2017 年 9 月 21 日收集。2022 年 11 月 15 日至 12 月 31 日进行了重复数据的线性混合模型、轨迹分析和中介分析。
1 年内累积的氯胺酮剂量(毫克)。
主要结局是通过电话评估的每月平均疼痛强度(数字疼痛评定量表[NPRS]上的 0-10),纳入医院后 1 年进行评估。抑郁和焦虑(医院焦虑和抑郁量表[HADS])、生活质量(12 项简短健康调查[SF-12])、累积氯胺酮剂量、不良反应和伴随治疗为次要结局。
共纳入 329 例患者(平均[标准差]年龄 51.4[11.0]岁;249 名女性[75.7%]和 80 名男性[24.3%])。重复给予氯胺酮与 NPRS 下降(效应量=-0.52[95%CI,-0.62 至-0.41];P<.001)和 SF-12 心理健康维度评分(39.7[10.9]至 42.2[11.1];P<.001)和身体健康维度评分(28.5[7.9]至 29.5[9.2];P=.02)升高相关。不良反应处于正常范围内。无抑郁症状和有抑郁症状的患者在疼痛减轻方面存在显著差异(回归系数,-0.04[95%CI,-0.06 至-0.01];交互时间×基线抑郁[HADS 评分≤7 或>7]的整体 P=.002)。中介模型显示,氯胺酮剂量与疼痛减轻无关(r=0.01;P=.61),与抑郁无关(r=-0.06;P=.32),而抑郁与疼痛减轻相关(回归系数,0.03[95%CI,0.01-0.04];P<.001),而氯胺酮剂量则不相关(回归系数,0.00[95%CI,-0.01 至 0.01];P=.67)。基线抑郁介导的疼痛减轻比例为 64.6%。
这项关于慢性难治性疼痛的队列研究结果表明,抑郁(而非氯胺酮剂量或焦虑)是氯胺酮与疼痛减轻相关的中介因素。这一发现为氯胺酮主要通过抑制抑郁来减轻疼痛提供了全新的见解。这进一步强调了对慢性疼痛患者进行系统全面评估的必要性,以诊断严重的抑郁症状,在这种情况下,氯胺酮将是一种非常有价值的治疗选择。