Jun Jungmi, Zhang Nanlan, Zain Ali, Mohammadi Ehsan
School of Journalism and Mass Communications, College of Information and Communications, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.
School of Information Science, College of Information and Communications, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.
Subst Use Misuse. 2022;57(3):472-480. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2021.2019777. Epub 2022 Jan 5.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authorized the marketing of the IQOS tobacco heating system as a modified risk tobacco product (MRTP) in July 2020, permitting its 'reduced exposure' marketing. This decision is accompanied by much controversy among the global health community. We provide a preliminary analysis of Twitter conversations regarding the MRTP authorization of IQOS by identifying the authors, valence towards the policy decision, source of cited link, and focused topic. We analyzed 548 tweets mentioning MRTP posted between July 2016 (when PMI submitted the proposal) and October 2020. We found a higher proportion of pro-MRTP valence (25.4%) than anti-MRTP (16.2%). Nearly half of the tweets (47.2%) expressing personal opinions presented pro-MRTP valence (vs. anti-MRTP = 23.9%). The FDA website was more frequently cited in pro-MRTP tweets (30.8% vs. anti = 4.8%), while tobacco control advocates' websites were cited only in anti-MRTP tweets (77.4% vs. pro = 0). Pro-MRTP valence appeared more frequently in tweets mentioning health (53.1% vs. anti =38.5%) and cessation (100% vs. anti = 0). Nearly 42% of tweets showed a bot score greater than .43, indicating a possibility of automation. Continuous efforts are needed to surveil the industry's attempts to create a climate of false consensus and circulate misinformation regarding MRTP on social media, as well as to assist non-scientific audiences' understanding of MRTP.
2020年7月,美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准了IQOS烟草加热系统作为一种风险降低型烟草产品(MRTP)上市销售,允许其进行“减少接触”宣传。这一决定在全球卫生界引发了诸多争议。我们通过识别作者、对该政策决定的态度倾向、所引用链接的来源以及重点话题,对有关IQOS的MRTP批准的推特对话进行了初步分析。我们分析了2016年7月(菲利普莫里斯国际公司提交提案之时)至2020年10月期间发布的548条提及MRTP的推文。我们发现,支持MRTP的态度倾向比例(25.4%)高于反对MRTP的比例(16.2%)。在表达个人观点的推文中,近一半(47.2%)呈现出支持MRTP的态度倾向(相比之下,反对MRTP的比例为23.9%)。支持MRTP的推文中更频繁引用FDA网站(30.8%,而反对的为4.8%),而烟草控制倡导者的网站仅在反对MRTP的推文中被引用(77.4%,而支持的为0)。支持MRTP的值在提及健康的推文中出现得更频繁(53.1%,而反对的为38.5%)以及在提及戒烟的推文中(100%,而反对的为0)。近42%的推文显示机器人得分大于0.43,这表明存在自动化的可能性。需要持续努力监测该行业在社交媒体上营造虚假共识氛围并传播有关MRTP的错误信息的企图,同时帮助非专业受众理解MRTP。