Suppr超能文献

讨论加热烟草产品在 Twitter 上的 IQOS 修改风险烟草产品授权和美国进口禁令之后:内容分析。

Discussion of Heated Tobacco Products on Twitter Following IQOS's Modified-Risk Tobacco Product Authorization and US Import Ban: Content Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, United States.

Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2024 Oct 24;26:e53938. doi: 10.2196/53938.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Understanding public opinions about emerging tobacco products is important to inform future interventions and regulatory decisions. Heated tobacco products (HTPs) are an emerging tobacco product category promoted by the tobacco industry as a "better alternative" to combustible cigarettes. Philip Morris International's IQOS is leading the global HTP market and recently has been subject to important policy events, including the US Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) modified-risk tobacco product (MRTP) authorization (July 2020) and the US import ban (November 2021). Although limited in their legal implications outside the United States, these policy events have been quoted in global news outlets and Philip Morris International's promotional communications, showing how they may potentially impact global tobacco regulation. Given the impending return of IQOS to the US market, understanding how the policy events were received through social media discourse will provide valuable insights to inform global tobacco control policy.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to examine HTP-related social media discourse around important policy events.

METHODS

We analyzed HTP-related posts on Twitter during the time period that included IQOS's MRTP authorization in the United States and the US import ban, examining personal testimonial, news/information, and direct marketing/retail tweets separately. We also examined how the tweets discussed health and policy. A total of 10,454 public English tweets (posted from June 2020 to December 2021) were collected using HTP-related keywords. We randomly sampled 2796 (26.7%) tweets and conducted a content analysis. We used pairwise co-occurrence analyses to evaluate connections across themes.

RESULTS

Tweet volumes peaked around IQOS-related policy events. Among all tweets, personal testimonials were the most common (1613/2796, 57.7%), followed by news/information (862/2796, 30.8%) and direct marketing/retail (321/2796, 11%). Among personal testimonials, more tweets were positive (495/1613, 30.7%) than negative (372/1613, 23.1%), often comparing the health risks of HTPs with cigarettes (402/1613, 24.9%) or vaping products (252/1613, 15.6%). Approximately 10% (31/321) of the direct marketing/retail tweets promoted international delivery, suggesting cross-border promotion. More than a quarter of tweets (809/2796, 28.9%) discussed US and global policy, including misinterpretation about IQOS being a "safer" tobacco product after the US FDA's MRTP authorization. Neutral testimonials mentioning the IQOS brand (634/1613, 39.3%) and discussing policy (378/1613, 23.4%) showed the largest pairwise co-occurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Results suggest the need for careful communication about the meaning of MRTP authorizations and relative risks of tobacco products. Many tweets expressed HTP-favorable opinions referring to reduced health risks, even though the US FDA has denied marketing of the HTP with reduced risk claims. The popularity of social media as an information source with global reach poses unique challenges in health communication and health policies. While many countries restrict tobacco marketing via the web, our results suggest that retailers may circumvent such regulations by operating overseas.

摘要

背景

了解公众对新兴烟草产品的看法对于为未来的干预和监管决策提供信息非常重要。加热烟草制品(HTP)是烟草行业推出的一种新兴烟草产品类别,被宣传为可燃香烟的“更好替代品”。菲利普莫里斯国际公司的 IQOS 主导着全球 HTP 市场,最近经历了重要的政策事件,包括美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)的修改风险烟草产品(MRTP)授权(2020 年 7 月)和美国进口禁令(2021 年 11 月)。尽管这些政策事件在美国以外的地区其法律影响有限,但它们已被全球新闻媒体和菲利普莫里斯国际公司的宣传材料引用,展示了它们可能对全球烟草监管产生的潜在影响。鉴于 IQOS 即将重返美国市场,了解通过社交媒体话语对这些政策事件的看法将为全球烟草控制政策提供有价值的见解。

目的

本研究旨在研究与重要政策事件相关的 HTP 社交媒体话语。

方法

我们分析了美国 IQOS 的 MRTP 授权和美国进口禁令期间,Twitter 上与 HTP 相关的帖子,分别对个人证言、新闻/信息和直接营销/零售推文进行了分析。我们还研究了推文如何讨论健康和政策问题。使用 HTP 相关关键词,共收集了 10454 条公共英语推文(发布时间为 2020 年 6 月至 2021 年 12 月)。我们随机抽取了 2796 条(26.7%)推文进行内容分析。我们使用成对共现分析来评估主题之间的联系。

结果

与 IQOS 相关政策事件相关的推文数量达到峰值。在所有推文中,个人证言最为常见(1613/2796,57.7%),其次是新闻/信息(862/2796,30.8%)和直接营销/零售(321/2796,11%)。在个人证言中,更多的推文是正面的(495/1613,30.7%)而不是负面的(372/1613,23.1%),经常将 HTPs 的健康风险与香烟(402/1613,24.9%)或电子烟产品(252/1613,15.6%)进行比较。约 10%(31/321)的直接营销/零售推文宣传国际配送,表明存在跨境促销。超过四分之一的推文(809/2796,28.9%)讨论了美国和全球政策,包括在美国 FDA 的 MRTP 授权后对 IQOS 成为“更安全”烟草产品的误解。提及 IQOS 品牌的中性证言(634/1613,39.3%)和讨论政策的证言(378/1613,23.4%)显示出最大的成对共现。

结论

结果表明,有必要对 MRTP 授权的含义和烟草产品的相对风险进行谨慎沟通。许多推文表达了对 HTP 有利的意见,认为 HTP 的健康风险降低,尽管美国 FDA 否认了具有降低风险声称的 HTP 营销。社交媒体作为具有全球影响力的信息来源的普及给健康传播和健康政策带来了独特的挑战。虽然许多国家通过网络限制烟草营销,但我们的研究结果表明,零售商可能通过在海外运营来规避这些法规。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83c3/11544331/8b49109837d0/jmir_v26i1e53938_fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验