Shah Vishal P, Breeher Laura E, Alleckson Julie M, Rivers David G, Wang Zhen, Stratton Emily R, Farah Wigdan, Hainy Caitlin M, Swift Melanie D
Division of Preventive, Occupational and Aerospace Medicine, Mayo Clinic, RochesterMinnesota.
Evidence-Based Practice Research Program, Mayo Clinic, RochesterMinnesota.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2022 Dec;43(12):1785-1789. doi: 10.1017/ice.2021.533. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
To assess the rate and factors associated with healthcare personnel (HCP) testing positive for severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) after an occupational exposure.
Retrospective cohort study.
Academic medical center with sites in Minnesota, Wisconsin, Arizona, and Florida.
HCP with a high or medium risk occupational exposure to a patient or other HCP with SARS-CoV-2.
We reviewed the records of HCP with significant occupational exposures from March 20, 2020, through December 31, 2020. We then performed regression analysis to assess the impact of demographic and occupational variables to assess their impact on the likelihood of testing positive for SARS-CoV-2.
In total, 2,253 confirmed occupational exposures occurred during the study period. Employees were the source for 57.1% of exposures. Overall, 101 HCP (4.5%) tested positive in the postexposure period. Of these, 80 had employee sources of exposure and 21 had patient sources of exposure. The postexposure infection rate was 6.2% when employees were the source, compared to 2.2% with patient sources. In a multivariate analysis, occupational exposure from an employee source had a higher risk of testing positive compared to a patient source (odds ratio [OR], 3.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.72-6.04). Sex, age, high-risk exposure, and HCP role were not associated with an increased risk of testing positive.
The risk of acquiring coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) following a significant occupational exposure has remained relatively low, even in the prevaccination era. Exposure to an infectious coworker carries a higher risk than exposure to a patient. Continued vigilance and precautions remain necessary in healthcare settings.
评估医护人员(HCP)在职业暴露后严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)检测呈阳性的比率及相关因素。
回顾性队列研究。
位于明尼苏达州、威斯康星州、亚利桑那州和佛罗里达州的学术医疗中心。
对SARS-CoV-2患者或其他医护人员有高风险或中等风险职业暴露的医护人员。
我们回顾了2020年3月20日至2020年12月31日期间有重大职业暴露的医护人员记录。然后进行回归分析,以评估人口统计学和职业变量的影响,以评估它们对SARS-CoV-2检测呈阳性可能性的影响。
在研究期间共发生了2253次确诊的职业暴露。员工是57.1%暴露事件的源头。总体而言,101名医护人员(4.5%)在暴露后检测呈阳性。其中,80人暴露源头是员工,21人暴露源头是患者。当员工是暴露源头时,暴露后感染率为6.2%,而患者作为暴露源头时为2.2%。在多变量分析中,与患者源头相比,员工源头的职业暴露检测呈阳性的风险更高(优势比[OR],3.22;95%置信区间[CI],1.72 - 6.04)。性别、年龄、高风险暴露和医护人员角色与检测呈阳性风险增加无关。
即使在疫苗接种前时代,重大职业暴露后感染冠状病毒病2019(COVID-19)的风险仍然相对较低。接触感染的同事比接触患者的风险更高。在医疗机构中持续保持警惕和采取预防措施仍然是必要的。