Annese Vito, Nathwani Rahul, Alkhatry Maryam, Al-Rifai Ahmad, Al Awadhi Sameer, Georgopoulos Filippos, Jazzar Ahmad N, Khassouan Ahmed M, Koutoubi Zaher, Taha Mazen S, Limdi Jimmy K
Department of Gastroenterology, Fakeeh University Hospital, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Department of Gastroenterology, Mediclinic City Hospital, Mohammed Bin Rashid University, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2021 Dec 22;14:17562848211065329. doi: 10.1177/17562848211065329. eCollection 2021.
Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are chronic, relapsing-remitting inflammatory conditions with a substantial negative impact on health-related quality of life and work productivity. Treatment of IBD has been revolutionized by the advent of biologic therapies, initially with anti-TNF agents and more recently with multiple alternatives targets, and yet more under development.
Approximatively one third of patients do not respond to biologic therapy and more importantly a significant proportion experiences partial response or loss of response during treatment. The latter are common clinical situations and paradoxically are not addressed in the commercial drug labels and available guidelines. There is therefore a clinical need for physicians to understand when and how eventually to optimize the biologic therapy.
This consensus using a Delphi methodology was promoted and supported by the Emirates Society of Gastroenterology and Hepatology to close this gap.
Following an extensive systematic review of over 60,000 studies, 81 studies with dose escalation and five addressing drug monitoring were selected and in addition five systematic reviews and three guidelines.
after three rounds of voting 18 statements were selected with agreement ranging from of 80% to 100.
炎症性肠病(IBD)是一种慢性、复发缓解型炎症性疾病,对健康相关生活质量和工作效率有重大负面影响。生物疗法的出现彻底改变了IBD的治疗方式,最初是使用抗TNF药物,最近则有多种替代靶点药物,并且还有更多药物正在研发中。
大约三分之一的患者对生物疗法无反应,更重要的是,相当一部分患者在治疗期间出现部分反应或反应丧失。后两种情况是常见的临床情况,但矛盾的是,商业药品标签和现有指南并未涉及。因此,临床医生需要了解何时以及如何最终优化生物疗法。
阿联酋胃肠病学和肝病学会采用德尔菲法促成并支持了这一共识,以弥补这一差距。
在对60000多项研究进行广泛的系统评价后,选择了81项剂量递增研究和5项药物监测研究,此外还有5项系统评价和3项指南。
经过三轮投票,选出了18条声明,达成率在80%至100%之间。