Suppr超能文献

使用和不使用自酸蚀粘结剂时,Embrace WetBond和Helioseal-F窝沟封闭剂保留情况的评估:12个月随访

Evaluation of Embrace WetBond and Helioseal-F sealant retention with and without a Self-etch adhesive: A 12 month follow-up.

作者信息

Mathew Gemimaa, Jayakaran Trophimus-Gnanabagyan, Ramkumar Hemalatha, Dakshinamoorthy Senthil, Paulindraraj Shankar, Solomon Nancy

机构信息

Consultant Pediatric Dentist. Rya Cosmo Hospital, Purasaiwakkam, Chennai - 600012, Tamil Nadu, India.

Senior Lecturer. Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, SRM Dental College, Ramapuram, Chennai - 600089, Tamil Nadu, India.

出版信息

J Clin Exp Dent. 2021 Dec 1;13(12):e1189-e1195. doi: 10.4317/jced.58707. eCollection 2021 Dec.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pit and fissures on the young permanent tooth are ideal in harbouring dental plaque and calculus. Hence it is important to provide a preventive agent to protect against dental caries. Aim: To evaluate the retention of two different pit and fissure sealants with and without a self-etch adhesive in the first permanent molars for a period of one year.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

280 molars were included among 70 healthy children. According to randomisation, the groups were divided into Group IA - Embrace without Adhse One F bonding agent and Group IB - Embrace with Adhse One F bonding agent, Group IIA - Helioseal F without Adhse One F bonding agent and Group IIB - Helioseal F with Adhse One F bonding agent. The sealants were assessed clinically at 3,6,9, and 12 months using the modified Colour, Coverage, Caries (CCC) sealant evaluation system.

RESULTS

At the end of 12 months, the retention rates of Group IB showed statistically significant results, followed by Group IIB, Group IA and Group IIA.

CONCLUSIONS

At twelve months follow-up Embrase WetBond and Helioseal-F were better retentive when used with a Adhese One F bonding agent which was statistically significant. Retention, Bonding agent, Embrace WetBond, Helioseal-F.

摘要

背景

年轻恒牙的窝沟是窝藏牙菌斑和牙结石的理想部位。因此,提供一种预防剂来预防龋齿很重要。目的:评估两种不同的窝沟封闭剂在有无自酸蚀粘结剂的情况下,在第一恒磨牙中保留一年的情况。

材料与方法

70名健康儿童的280颗磨牙被纳入研究。根据随机分组,这些组被分为IA组——使用Embrace但不使用Adhse One F粘结剂,IB组——使用Embrace并使用Adhse One F粘结剂,IIA组——使用Helioseal F但不使用Adhse One F粘结剂,IIB组——使用Helioseal F并使用Adhse One F粘结剂。使用改良的颜色、覆盖度、龋齿(CCC)窝沟封闭剂评估系统在3、6、9和12个月时对窝沟封闭剂进行临床评估。

结果

在12个月结束时,IB组的保留率显示出统计学上的显著结果,其次是IIB组、IA组和IIA组。

结论

在12个月的随访中,当与Adhese One F粘结剂一起使用时,Embrase WetBond和Helioseal - F的保留效果更好,这具有统计学意义。保留率、粘结剂、Embrase WetBond、Helioseal - F。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7bf/8715554/2b5925103c1a/jced-13-e1189-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验