• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将游离 DNA 筛查引入临床护理对早孕期超声的影响。

Impact of introducing cell-free DNA screening into clinical care on first trimester ultrasound.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Women's Health, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA.

出版信息

Prenat Diagn. 2022 Feb;42(2):254-259. doi: 10.1002/pd.6086. Epub 2022 Jan 10.

DOI:10.1002/pd.6086
PMID:34989002
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

First-trimester ultrasound is an important component of prenatal care. We investigated the impact of introducing cell-free DNA (cfDNA) aneuploidy screening into routine care, on performance of first-trimester ultrasound.

METHODS

Retrospective study of patients who had prenatal care at a tertiary referral center. We compared the performance of any first-trimester ultrasound between three different aneuploidy screening protocols, used consecutively during the study period: (1) combined first-trimester screening (FTS); (2) FTS and cfDNA offered together; (3) patients requested to choose between FTS and cfDNA. Secondary outcomes included performance of nuchal translucency (NT), aneuploidy screens and diagnostic genetic procedures.

RESULTS

The number of patients undergoing first-trimester ultrasound remained similar with the second protocol but decreased in the third (68.7% vs. 40.9%, OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.25-0.4, p < 0.001). Diagnostic procedures decreased between protocol 1 and 2 (7.6% vs. 4.4%, OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.37-0.93, p = 0.02) while NT scans decreased between protocol 2 and 3 (6.8% vs. 1.3%, OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.09-0.4, p < 0.001). The rate of FTS decreased over the study period and less women had cfDNA when they had to choose one method (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Introducing cfDNA screening as an alternative to FTS, resulted in fewer patients receiving ultrasound in the first-trimester.

摘要

目的

早期超声是产前保健的重要组成部分。我们研究了在常规护理中引入游离胎儿 DNA(cfDNA)非整倍体筛查对早期超声检查表现的影响。

方法

对在三级转诊中心接受产前保健的患者进行回顾性研究。我们比较了在研究期间连续使用的三种不同非整倍体筛查方案(1)联合早孕期筛查(FTS);(2)FTS 和 cfDNA 联合提供;(3)患者要求在 FTS 和 cfDNA 之间选择。次要结局包括颈项透明层(NT)、非整倍体筛查和诊断性遗传程序的表现。

结果

第二种方案下进行早孕期超声检查的患者数量保持相似,但第三种方案下数量减少(68.7%比 40.9%,OR 0.32,95%CI 0.25-0.4,p<0.001)。诊断程序在方案 1 和 2 之间减少(7.6%比 4.4%,OR 0.59,95%CI 0.37-0.93,p=0.02),而 NT 扫描在方案 2 和 3 之间减少(6.8%比 1.3%,OR 0.18,95%CI 0.09-0.4,p<0.001)。FTS 的使用率在研究期间下降,当患者必须选择一种方法时,接受 cfDNA 的女性较少(p<0.001)。

结论

将 cfDNA 筛查作为 FTS 的替代方法引入,导致接受早孕期超声检查的患者减少。

相似文献

1
Impact of introducing cell-free DNA screening into clinical care on first trimester ultrasound.将游离 DNA 筛查引入临床护理对早孕期超声的影响。
Prenat Diagn. 2022 Feb;42(2):254-259. doi: 10.1002/pd.6086. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
2
First-trimester screening based on cell-free DNA vs combined screening: A randomized clinical trial on women's experience.基于游离胎儿 DNA 的早孕期筛查与联合筛查:一项关于女性体验的随机临床试验。
Prenat Diagn. 2020 Oct;40(11):1482-1488. doi: 10.1002/pd.5800. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
3
Prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy in singleton pregnancies.单胎妊娠胎儿非整倍体的产前筛查。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2011 Jul;33(7):736-750. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34961-1.
4
Should cell-free DNA testing be used in pregnancy with increased fetal nuchal translucency?在胎儿颈项透明层增厚的妊娠中是否应该使用游离 DNA 检测?
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 May;55(5):645-651. doi: 10.1002/uog.20397. Epub 2020 Apr 7.
5
Utility of ultrasound examination at 10-14 weeks prior to cell-free DNA screening for fetal aneuploidy.在进行游离DNA筛查胎儿非整倍体之前10至14周时超声检查的效用。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Apr;49(4):465-469. doi: 10.1002/uog.15995. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
6
Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series #57: Evaluation and management of isolated soft ultrasound markers for aneuploidy in the second trimester: (Replaces Consults #10, Single umbilical artery, October 2010; #16, Isolated echogenic bowel diagnosed on second-trimester ultrasound, August 2011; #17, Evaluation and management of isolated renal pelviectasis on second-trimester ultrasound, December 2011; #25, Isolated fetal choroid plexus cysts, April 2013; #27, Isolated echogenic intracardiac focus, August 2013).母胎医学会咨询系列第 57 号:中孕期单纯性软指标超声标记物用于染色体非整倍体的评估与管理:(取代咨询 10 号:单脐动脉,2010 年 10 月;咨询 16 号:中孕期超声诊断孤立性肠回声增强,2011 年 8 月;咨询 17 号:中孕期超声检查孤立性肾盂扩张的评估与管理,2011 年 12 月;咨询 25 号:孤立性胎儿脉络丛囊肿,2013 年 4 月;咨询 27 号:孤立性心内强回声灶,2013 年 8 月)。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Oct;225(4):B2-B15. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.06.079. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
7
State-wide utilization and performance of traditional and cell-free DNA-based prenatal testing pathways: the Victorian Perinatal Record Linkage (PeRL) study.全州范围内传统和无细胞 DNA 产前检测途径的利用和表现:维多利亚州围产期记录链接(PeRL)研究。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Aug;56(2):215-224. doi: 10.1002/uog.21899.
8
What would be missed in the first trimester if nuchal translucency measurement is replaced by cell free DNA foetal aneuploidy screening?如果用游离DNA胎儿非整倍体筛查取代颈部透明带测量,孕早期会遗漏什么?
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 May;38(4):498-501. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2017.1391755. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
9
Uptake of noninvasive prenatal testing at a large academic referral center.大型学术转诊中心对无创产前检测的接受情况。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Dec;211(6):651.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.06.038. Epub 2014 Jun 19.
10
First-trimester risk assessment based on ultrasound and cell-free DNA vs combined screening: a randomized controlled trial.早孕期基于超声和游离 DNA 检测与联合筛查的风险评估:一项随机对照试验。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Apr;51(4):437-444. doi: 10.1002/uog.18905. Epub 2018 Mar 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of Fetal Medicine Foundation's Non-Biochemical Risk Calculation Algorithm in Detection of Common Trisomies Screening at 11-13 weeks of Gestation: 12 Years' Experience in Northern Thailand.胎儿医学基金会非生化风险计算算法在孕11至13周常见三体筛查中的有效性:泰国北部的12年经验
Int J Womens Health. 2025 Jun 5;17:1693-1699. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S526271. eCollection 2025.
2
Current Perspectives of Prenatal Cell-free DNA Screening in Clinical Management of First-Trimester Septated Cystic Hygroma.孕早期分隔性囊状水囊瘤临床管理中产前游离DNA筛查的现状
Int J Womens Health. 2022 Oct 25;14:1499-1518. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S328201. eCollection 2022.
3
Cost-effectiveness of ultrasound before non-invasive prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy.
超声检查在非侵入性产前筛查胎儿非整倍体中的成本效益。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Mar;61(3):325-332. doi: 10.1002/uog.26100.
4
Fetal Hand Abnormalities in the First-Trimester Scan: A Report of Two Cases.孕早期超声检查发现的胎儿手部异常:两例报告
Cureus. 2022 Mar 15;14(3):e23189. doi: 10.7759/cureus.23189. eCollection 2022 Mar.