Suppr超能文献

将游离 DNA 筛查引入临床护理对早孕期超声的影响。

Impact of introducing cell-free DNA screening into clinical care on first trimester ultrasound.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Women's Health, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA.

出版信息

Prenat Diagn. 2022 Feb;42(2):254-259. doi: 10.1002/pd.6086. Epub 2022 Jan 10.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

First-trimester ultrasound is an important component of prenatal care. We investigated the impact of introducing cell-free DNA (cfDNA) aneuploidy screening into routine care, on performance of first-trimester ultrasound.

METHODS

Retrospective study of patients who had prenatal care at a tertiary referral center. We compared the performance of any first-trimester ultrasound between three different aneuploidy screening protocols, used consecutively during the study period: (1) combined first-trimester screening (FTS); (2) FTS and cfDNA offered together; (3) patients requested to choose between FTS and cfDNA. Secondary outcomes included performance of nuchal translucency (NT), aneuploidy screens and diagnostic genetic procedures.

RESULTS

The number of patients undergoing first-trimester ultrasound remained similar with the second protocol but decreased in the third (68.7% vs. 40.9%, OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.25-0.4, p < 0.001). Diagnostic procedures decreased between protocol 1 and 2 (7.6% vs. 4.4%, OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.37-0.93, p = 0.02) while NT scans decreased between protocol 2 and 3 (6.8% vs. 1.3%, OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.09-0.4, p < 0.001). The rate of FTS decreased over the study period and less women had cfDNA when they had to choose one method (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Introducing cfDNA screening as an alternative to FTS, resulted in fewer patients receiving ultrasound in the first-trimester.

摘要

目的

早期超声是产前保健的重要组成部分。我们研究了在常规护理中引入游离胎儿 DNA(cfDNA)非整倍体筛查对早期超声检查表现的影响。

方法

对在三级转诊中心接受产前保健的患者进行回顾性研究。我们比较了在研究期间连续使用的三种不同非整倍体筛查方案(1)联合早孕期筛查(FTS);(2)FTS 和 cfDNA 联合提供;(3)患者要求在 FTS 和 cfDNA 之间选择。次要结局包括颈项透明层(NT)、非整倍体筛查和诊断性遗传程序的表现。

结果

第二种方案下进行早孕期超声检查的患者数量保持相似,但第三种方案下数量减少(68.7%比 40.9%,OR 0.32,95%CI 0.25-0.4,p<0.001)。诊断程序在方案 1 和 2 之间减少(7.6%比 4.4%,OR 0.59,95%CI 0.37-0.93,p=0.02),而 NT 扫描在方案 2 和 3 之间减少(6.8%比 1.3%,OR 0.18,95%CI 0.09-0.4,p<0.001)。FTS 的使用率在研究期间下降,当患者必须选择一种方法时,接受 cfDNA 的女性较少(p<0.001)。

结论

将 cfDNA 筛查作为 FTS 的替代方法引入,导致接受早孕期超声检查的患者减少。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验