• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评价和比较 S.T.O.N.E. 和 Guy 评分系统在预测仰卧位经皮肾镜取石术结果的应用。

Evaluation and comparison of S.T.O.N.E. and Guy's scoring systems for predicting percutaneous nephrolithotomy outcomes in supine position.

机构信息

Urology Department, Health Science University, Prof Dr Cemil Taşcıoğlu City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Urologia. 2022 Aug;89(3):397-403. doi: 10.1177/03915603211037605. Epub 2022 Jan 6.

DOI:10.1177/03915603211037605
PMID:34989263
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) was applied in the prone position until recently. But also, in recent years supine positions was applied in patients with kidney stones. Predicting how much renal stones can be cleared after surgery and possibility of complications is an important question for both surgeons and patients. Therefore different scoring systems are used to evaluate outcomes of PCNL before surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 2018 and 2020, 80 patients with renal stone who underwent PCNL in the supine position were evaluated preoperatively by S.T.O.N.E. and Guy's scoring systems (GSS). The predictions of both scoring systems for stone-free and complication rates in patients who underwent PCNL in the supine position were evaluated. Also, these scoring systems were compared among themselves for reliability.

RESULT

In both scoring systems, there was a statistically significant difference between postoperative stone-free (SF) and residual stone (RS) of patients and in predicting the likelihood of complications in patients. No statistically significant difference was found between the two scoring systems in predicting the stone-free rate.

CONCLUSION

Our findings revealed that S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry and Guy's score systems can be used effectively to predict stone-free rate, complications, and operation duration in supine position PCNL for renal stones.

摘要

背景

经皮肾镜碎石术(PCNL)直到最近才采用俯卧位进行。但近年来,仰卧位也应用于肾结石患者。对于外科医生和患者来说,预测手术后肾结石能清除多少以及并发症的可能性是一个重要的问题。因此,在手术前使用不同的评分系统来评估 PCNL 的结果。

患者和方法

在 2018 年至 2020 年间,80 例接受仰卧位 PCNL 的肾结石患者术前分别采用 S.T.O.N.E.和 Guy's 评分系统(GSS)进行评估。评估了这两种评分系统在预测仰卧位 PCNL 患者结石清除率和并发症发生率方面的准确性。此外,还比较了这两种评分系统之间的可靠性。

结果

在这两种评分系统中,术后结石清除率(SF)和残余结石率(RS)之间存在统计学差异,并且可以预测患者发生并发症的可能性。两种评分系统在预测结石清除率方面无统计学差异。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,S.T.O.N.E. 肾结石测量和 Guy 评分系统可有效用于预测仰卧位 PCNL 治疗肾结石的结石清除率、并发症和手术时间。

相似文献

1
Evaluation and comparison of S.T.O.N.E. and Guy's scoring systems for predicting percutaneous nephrolithotomy outcomes in supine position.评价和比较 S.T.O.N.E. 和 Guy 评分系统在预测仰卧位经皮肾镜取石术结果的应用。
Urologia. 2022 Aug;89(3):397-403. doi: 10.1177/03915603211037605. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
2
Comparison of Guy's, S.T.O.N.E. and CROES Scoring Systems for Predicting Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Outcomes in Eldery Patients.比较盖伊氏、S.T.O.N.E.和CROES评分系统对老年患者经皮肾镜取石术预后的预测情况。
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2021 Mar;31(3):307-313. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2021.03.307.
3
Which is better? Guy's versus S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry scoring systems in predicting stone-free status post-percutaneous nephrolithotomy.哪种更好?盖伊医院与S.T.O.N.E.肾结石测量评分系统在预测经皮肾镜取石术后无结石状态方面的比较
World J Urol. 2015 Nov;33(11):1821-5. doi: 10.1007/s00345-015-1508-5. Epub 2015 Feb 13.
4
External Validation and Comparisons of the Scoring Systems for Predicting Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Outcomes: A Single Center Experience with 506 Cases.预测经皮肾镜取石术结果评分系统的外部验证与比较:单中心506例经验
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017 Dec;27(12):1284-1289. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0355. Epub 2017 Sep 5.
5
Evaluation of various nephrometric scoring system for nephrolithiasis to predict stone free status after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A comparative study.评价各种肾结石评分系统在经皮肾镜取石术后预测结石清除状态的价值:一项比较研究。
Urologia. 2022 Aug;89(3):418-423. doi: 10.1177/03915603211030162. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
6
Comparison of CROES, Guy's, S.T.O.N.E., and S-ReSC nephrolithometric scoring systems in predicting success and complications in patients undergoing supine mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy.CROES、Guy's、S.T.O.N.E. 和 S-ReSC 肾石测量评分系统在预测仰卧位微创经皮肾镜取石术患者的成功率和并发症方面的比较。
Urolithiasis. 2024 Oct 14;52(1):147. doi: 10.1007/s00240-024-01642-8.
7
Comparison of S.T.O.N.E and CROES nephrolithometry scoring systems for predicting stone-free status and complication rates after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a single center study with 262 cases.比较 S.T.O.N.E 和 CROES 肾结石评分系统在预测经皮肾镜取石术后结石清除率和并发症发生率方面的应用:一项单中心 262 例研究。
Urolithiasis. 2017 Oct;45(5):489-494. doi: 10.1007/s00240-016-0935-0. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
8
Validation of S.T.O.N.E nephrolithometry and Guy's stone score for predicting surgical outcome after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.验证S.T.O.N.E肾石测量法和盖氏结石评分对经皮肾镜取石术后手术结果的预测价值。
Urol Ann. 2020 Oct-Dec;12(4):324-330. doi: 10.4103/UA.UA_136_19. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
9
[Do the nephrolithometry scoring systems predict the success of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Comparison of 4 scores: The Guy's stone score, STONE Score, CROES nomogram and S-ReSC score].[肾结石测量评分系统能否预测经皮肾镜取石术的成功率。四种评分的比较:盖伊结石评分、STONE评分、CROES列线图和S-ReSC评分]
Prog Urol. 2019 Jul-Aug;29(8-9):432-439. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2019.05.007. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
10
Prediction of Pediatric Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Outcomes Using Contemporary Scoring Systems.应用当代评分系统预测小儿经皮肾镜取石术的结局。
J Urol. 2017 Nov;198(5):1146-1152. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.04.084. Epub 2017 Apr 24.