Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA; Department of Civil Engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Mar 25;814:152768. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152768. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
Flooding is one of the most frequent natural disasters, causing billions of dollars in damage and threatening vulnerable communities worldwide. Although the impact of flooding can never be diminished, minimizing future losses is possible by taking structural or non-structural mitigation actions. Mitigation applications are often costly practices. However, they can be more feasible for long-term planning and protection. On the other hand, selecting a feasible option requires a comprehensive analysis of potential risk and damages and comparing the costs and benefits of different mitigation types. This paper presents a web-based decision support framework called Mitigation and Damage Assessment System (MiDAS) that analyzes flood risk impacts and mitigation strategies at the community and property-level with the goal of informing communities on the consequences of flooding and mitigation alternatives and encouraging them to participate in the community rating system. The framework utilizes regulatory flood inundation maps, damage functions, property information, scenario-based climate projections, and mitigation inputs and guidelines from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). It will help users select the appropriate flood mitigation measures based on various characteristics (e.g., foundation type, occupancy, square footage) and provide cost estimates for implementing measures. The system also provides a decision tree algorithm for analyzing and representing the mitigation decision by reviewing existing guidelines (e.g., FEMA, USACE). We analyzed the community-level mitigation for three major cities in Eastern Iowa (Cedar Falls, Cedar Rapids, and Waterloo) and found certain measures (e.g., wet/dry floodproofing) are cost-effective for community-level mitigation. Implementation of mitigation measures can reduce the property's vulnerability and improve the response to a flooding event.
洪水是最常见的自然灾害之一,造成数十亿美元的损失,并威胁着全球脆弱社区。尽管洪水的影响永远无法减轻,但通过采取结构性或非结构性缓解措施,减少未来的损失是可能的。缓解应用通常是昂贵的做法。然而,对于长期规划和保护来说,它们可能更可行。另一方面,选择可行的方案需要对潜在风险和损害进行全面分析,并比较不同缓解类型的成本和效益。本文提出了一个名为缓解和损害评估系统 (MiDAS) 的基于网络的决策支持框架,该框架可在社区和财产层面分析洪水风险影响和缓解策略,目的是告知社区洪水的后果和缓解替代方案,并鼓励他们参与社区评级系统。该框架利用监管洪水泛滥地图、损害函数、财产信息、基于情景的气候预测以及来自联邦紧急事务管理局 (FEMA) 和美国陆军工程兵团 (USACE) 的缓解投入和指南。它将帮助用户根据各种特征(例如,基础类型、占用情况、平方英尺)选择适当的洪水缓解措施,并为实施措施提供成本估算。该系统还提供了一个决策树算法,用于通过审查现有指南(例如,FEMA、USACE)来分析和表示缓解决策。我们分析了爱荷华州东部三个主要城市(雪松瀑布、锡达拉皮兹和滑铁卢)的社区层面缓解措施,发现某些措施(例如,干湿防洪)对社区层面缓解是具有成本效益的。缓解措施的实施可以降低财产的脆弱性,并改善对洪水事件的应对能力。