• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Effects of sucralfate, 15(R)15-methyl prostaglandin E2, and cimetidine on rat gastric mucosal damage induced by ethanol.

作者信息

Kuwayama H, Miyake S, Matsuo Y

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Am J Med. 1987 Sep 28;83(3B):4-10. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(87)90819-9.

DOI:10.1016/0002-9343(87)90819-9
PMID:3499076
Abstract

The efficacy of sucralfate, 15(R)15-methyl prostaglandin E2, and cimetidine in protecting against ethanol injury in rat stomachs was examined. Rats that had been fasted were pretreated intragastrically with either sucralfate 160 mg/kg, 15(R)15-methyl prostaglandin E2 16 micrograms/kg, cimetidine 100 mg/kg, or an equal amount of vehicle alone (control). One hour later, all rats received 1 ml of 99.5 percent ethanol orally and were killed 15 minutes or 24 hours later. Stomachs were removed, and mucosal damage was assessed macroscopically as well as by scanning electron microscopy. Pretreatment with either 15(R)15-methyl prostaglandin E2 or sucralfate significantly reduced the number and extent of ethanol-induced mucosal gastric lesions; pretreatment with cimetidine, however, failed to produce positive results. It is concluded that the abilities of 15(R)15-methyl prostaglandin E2 and sucralfate in protecting against ethanol injury are comparable.

摘要

相似文献

1
Effects of sucralfate, 15(R)15-methyl prostaglandin E2, and cimetidine on rat gastric mucosal damage induced by ethanol.
Am J Med. 1987 Sep 28;83(3B):4-10. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(87)90819-9.
2
Comparison of antacid, sucralfate, cimetidine, and ranitidine in protection of the gastric mucosa against ethanol injury.
Am J Med. 1985 Aug 30;79(2C):19-23. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(85)90567-4.
3
Prostaglandin protection of the gastric mucosa against alcohol injury--a dynamic time-related process. Role of the mucosal proliferative zone.前列腺素对胃黏膜酒精损伤的保护作用——一个与时间相关的动态过程。黏膜增殖区的作用。
Gastroenterology. 1985 Jan;88(1 Pt 2):334-52. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(85)80188-8.
4
Role of mucus and prostaglandins in the gastric mucosal protective actions of sucralfate against ethanol-induced injury in the rat.黏液和前列腺素在硫糖铝对大鼠乙醇诱导损伤的胃黏膜保护作用中的作用
Am J Med. 1987 Sep 28;83(3B):19-23. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(87)90822-9.
5
Effects of the synthesized prostaglandin E2-analogue arbaprostil on gastric mucosal lesions in rats.合成前列腺素E2类似物arbaprostil对大鼠胃黏膜损伤的影响。
Arzneimittelforschung. 1989 Dec;39(12):1571-3.
6
Effects of sucralfate, cimetidine and rabeprazole on mucosal hydroxyproline content in healing of ethanol-hcl-induced gastric lesions.硫糖铝、西咪替丁和雷贝拉唑对乙醇-盐酸诱导的胃损伤愈合过程中黏膜羟脯氨酸含量的影响。
Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2006 Jul;33(7):628-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1681.2006.04418.x.
7
Complementarity of in vitro and in vivo models for the evaluation of gastro-protective effects of pharmacological substances.用于评估药理物质胃保护作用的体外和体内模型的互补性。
Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Apr;31(2):155-164. doi: 10.1111/fcp.12248. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
8
Effects of the anti-ulcer agents ecabet sodium, cimetidine and sucralfate on acetylsalicylic acid-induced gastric mucosal damage deteriorated by renal failure in rats.抗溃疡药物依卡倍特钠、西咪替丁和硫糖铝对阿司匹林诱导的、因肾衰竭而恶化的大鼠胃黏膜损伤的影响。
Arzneimittelforschung. 2002;52(11):828-32. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1299975.
9
Gastric mucosa protection and prostaglandin E2 generation in rats by colloidal bismuth subcitrate (DE-NOL).枸橼酸铋钾(得乐)对大鼠胃黏膜的保护作用及前列腺素E2的生成
Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther. 1987 Apr;286(2):308-19.
10
Different mode of action of cimetidine and prostaglandin on the rat gastric mucosa under stress loading by restrain and water-immersion.西咪替丁和前列腺素在束缚加浸水应激负荷下对大鼠胃黏膜的不同作用方式
Gastroenterol Jpn. 1982 Oct;17(5):409-14. doi: 10.1007/BF02774716.