Department of Psychology, Mount Saint Vincent University, Halifax, NS B3M 2J6, Canada.
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada; Offord Centre for Child Studies, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada.
Child Abuse Negl. 2022 Feb;124:105451. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105451. Epub 2022 Jan 3.
Extensive research seeks to understand the intergenerational impact of child maltreatment. However, it remains unclear how parent's history of child maltreatment (PCM) is associated with child mental health, after accounting for children's experiences of maltreatment and other proximal risk factors.
This study examines the associations between PCM and youth internalizing and externalizing problems, while accounting for youth experiences of maltreatment (YM), and parent mental health and positive parenting.
Youth aged 14 to 17 years (N = 2266) participated in the 2014 Ontario Child Heath Study.
Parents and youth reported their experiences of child maltreatment. Parent-report and self-reports of youth internalizing and externalizing problems were also collected. Number of subtypes of maltreatment and specific subtypes of maltreatment were examined. Parents reported their own mental health problems and positive parenting practices.
Regarding number of maltreatment subtypes, initially PCM was associated with parent-reported, but not self-reported, youth internalizing and externalizing problems. After accounting for YM, parent mental health problems and positive parenting, only YM remained significant. Regarding specific subtypes of maltreatment, both parent and youth emotional abuse were related to parent- and youth-reported internalizing and externalizing problems, after controlling for other maltreatment subtypes. However, the effects of parent emotional abuse became nonsignificant after accounting for YM and proximal risk factors.
Findings indicate: 1) the unique associations between specific PCM and YM subtypes and youth mental health problems; 2) the role of proximal risk factors in explaining the association between PCM and youth mental health; and 3) the importance of multiple informants of youth mental health problems.
大量研究旨在了解儿童虐待的代际影响。然而,在考虑到儿童虐待经历和其他近端风险因素后,父母的儿童虐待史(PCM)如何与儿童心理健康相关仍然不清楚。
本研究考察了 PCM 与青少年内化和外化问题之间的关联,同时考虑了青少年的虐待经历(YM)、父母的心理健康和积极的育儿方式。
年龄在 14 至 17 岁的青少年(N=2266)参加了 2014 年安大略省儿童健康研究。
父母和青少年报告了他们的儿童虐待经历。还收集了父母报告和青少年自我报告的内化和外化问题。检查了虐待的亚型数量和特定的虐待亚型。父母报告了自己的心理健康问题和积极的育儿实践。
关于虐待亚型数量,最初 PCM 与父母报告的、但不是自我报告的青少年内化和外化问题有关。在考虑到 YM、父母心理健康问题和积极的育儿方式后,只有 YM 仍然具有统计学意义。关于特定的虐待亚型,父母和青少年的情感虐待都与父母和青少年报告的内化和外化问题有关,在控制了其他虐待亚型后。然而,在考虑到 YM 和近端风险因素后,父母情感虐待的影响变得不显著。
研究结果表明:1)特定的 PCM 和 YM 亚型与青少年心理健康问题之间的独特关联;2)近端风险因素在解释 PCM 与青少年心理健康之间关系中的作用;3)青少年心理健康问题的多信息源的重要性。