Suppr超能文献

洗必泰——一种常用但常被忽视的引发透析相关过敏反应的元凶(病例报告)。

Chlorhexidine - a commonly used but often neglected culprit of dialysis associated anaphylactic reactions (case report).

机构信息

Division of Nephrology, University Medicine Cluster, National University Health System Republic of Singapore, Level 10, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Republic of Singapore.

出版信息

BMC Nephrol. 2022 Jan 6;23(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12882-021-02646-x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hemodialysis-associated anaphylactic reactions are rare and frequently complex in nature due to the sheer number of possible culprit agents. Unfortunately, dialysis is often unavoidable or strictly essential for life-saving solute clearance or fluid removal in patients with end stage kidney failure and those with severe acute kidney injury. It is of utmost importance that the culprit agent is identified and avoided to allow continuation of dialysis treatment as needed.

CASE PRESENTATION

We present 2 cases of hemodialysis-associated anaphylactic reactions. These patients developed anaphylactic reactions peri-dialysis and were initially suspected to have dialyser reactions. They were investigated in a controlled healthcare setting and possible culprit agents were systemically identified and eliminated. They both underwent allergy testing and were diagnosed with chlorhexidine allergy. Of note, Case 1 was an incident dialysis patient at the time of presentation and Case 2 was a prevalent dialysis patient. This suggests that the time from initial sensitization to reaction may not always be helpful in determining if a particular agent is the culprit of an anaphylactic reaction. In both cases, the patients were dialysed through a tunnelled dialysis catheter. We postulate that the presence of an exit site, which represents a compromise to the integrity of the skin's epidermal barrier, may have a significant role in the development of these reactions. As chlorhexidine is a widely used disinfectant in hemodialysis, it is imperative that we consider it as a possible culprit agent when these reactions arise. To our knowledge, there are no other reported cases of anaphylaxis secondary to chlorhexidine use in dialysis patients other than a previous report in 2017. Our report also highlights the possibility of these reactions occurring more frequently in patients with damaged epidermal barriers and in patients exposed to higher environmental concentrations of chlorhexidine. These are novel concepts that can be explored with further research.

CONCLUSION

Chlorhexidine associated anaphylactic reactions can occur in the peri-dialysis setting and a high index of suspicion is paramount to diagnosis.

摘要

背景

血液透析相关的过敏反应较为罕见,但性质复杂,因为可能的致病因素很多。不幸的是,对于终末期肾衰竭和严重急性肾损伤患者,透析往往是不可避免的,或者对清除溶质和去除体液至关重要。因此,识别并避免致病因素至关重要,以便在需要时继续进行透析治疗。

病例介绍

我们介绍了 2 例血液透析相关过敏反应病例。这些患者在透析期间发生过敏反应,最初怀疑是透析器反应。在受控的医疗环境中对其进行了调查,并系统性地确定和消除了可能的致病因素。他们都接受了过敏测试,被诊断为对洗必泰过敏。值得注意的是,病例 1 在就诊时是偶发性透析患者,而病例 2 是常规透析患者。这表明,从初次致敏到反应的时间不一定有助于确定特定药物是否是过敏反应的致病因素。在这两种情况下,患者都是通过隧道式透析导管进行透析。我们推测,出口部位的存在(代表皮肤表皮屏障完整性的受损)可能在这些反应的发展中起着重要作用。由于洗必泰在血液透析中广泛用作消毒剂,因此当这些反应出现时,我们必须将其视为可能的致病因素。据我们所知,除了 2017 年的一篇报道外,没有其他关于透析患者因使用洗必泰引起过敏的报道。我们的报告还强调了这些反应在表皮屏障受损的患者和接触更高环境浓度洗必泰的患者中更频繁发生的可能性。这些是可以通过进一步研究探索的新概念。

结论

洗必泰相关过敏反应可在透析期间发生,高度怀疑是诊断的关键。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0b4/8734226/91a749767e9f/12882_2021_2646_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验