Frey Joseph J, Hall William J, Goldbach Jeremy T, Lanier Paul
Department of Social Work, University of North Texas, Denton, TX, United States.
School of Social Work, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 21;12:804064. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.804064. eCollection 2021.
Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and pansexual (LGB+) individuals have disproportionate rates of mental illness. Minority stress and sexual identity stigma are posited as the primary social determinants of LGB+ mental health disparities. Discussions in the literature have questioned the impact of sexual identity stigma in a world increasingly accepting of sexual minorities. Additionally, the LGB+ population in the United States South is often overlooked in American research. This article details a qualitative study exploring experiences related to sexual identity stigma among adults who identify as LGB+ in the United States South. Semi-structured interviews with 16 individuals were analyzed using content analysis. Six thematic categories of stigma emerged from participants' experiences: (a) navigating an LGB+ identity, (b) social acceptability of an LGB+ identity, (c) expectation of LGB+ stigma, (d) interpersonal discrimination and harassment, (e) structural stigma, and (f) relationship with the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) community. Findings suggest that sexual identity stigma remains a common experience among these Southern United States participants. Further, thematic categories and subcategories primarily aligned with extant theory with one exception: Intracommunity stigma, a form of stigma emanating from the LGBTQ community, emerged as a stigma type not currently accounted for in theoretical foundations underpinning mental health disparities in this population.
女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和泛性恋(LGB+)群体患有精神疾病的比例过高。少数群体压力和性取向歧视被认为是LGB+群体心理健康差距的主要社会决定因素。文献中的讨论对在一个越来越接受性少数群体的世界中性取向歧视的影响提出了质疑。此外,美国南方的LGB+群体在美国研究中常常被忽视。本文详细介绍了一项定性研究,该研究探讨了美国南方认同LGB+的成年人中性取向歧视的相关经历。对16名个体进行的半结构化访谈采用内容分析法进行分析。从参与者的经历中出现了六个歧视主题类别:(a)确立LGB+身份,(b)LGB+身份的社会可接受性,(c)对LGB+歧视的预期,(d)人际歧视和骚扰,(e)结构性歧视,以及(f)与女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别者和酷儿(LGBTQ)群体的关系。研究结果表明,性取向歧视在美国南方这些参与者中仍然是一种常见经历。此外,主题类别和子类别主要与现有理论一致,但有一个例外:群体内部歧视,一种源自LGBTQ群体的歧视形式,作为一种目前在该群体心理健康差距理论基础中未被考虑到的歧视类型出现。