• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2015 - 2018年俄罗斯大学的关键绩效指标:数据集与基准数据。

Key performance indicators of Russian universities for 2015-2018: Dataset and Benchmarking Data.

作者信息

Guseva Anna I, Kalashnik Viacheslav M, Kaminskii Vladimir I, Kireev Sergey V

机构信息

National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), Moscow, Russia.

出版信息

Data Brief. 2021 Dec 16;40:107695. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2021.107695. eCollection 2022 Feb.

DOI:10.1016/j.dib.2021.107695
PMID:34993283
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8713119/
Abstract

This article presents a performance dataset of 93 Russian universities, collected from 2015 to 2018 and evaluated according to 24 indicators. These data were gathered from materials, published in the process of monitoring the effectiveness of higher education institutions by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation, Web of Science (citation-based research analytics tool InCites) and Scopus (citation-based research analytics tool SciVal) databases, and information from international ranking agencies QS, THE, ARWU. The dataset comprises the assessments of university performances according to the most important indicators used in socio-economic studies of comparative analysis of higher education system development levels in different countries: educational, scientific and research, international, financial and economic performance and international public recognition (university positions in leading international rankings). Evaluated universities are grouped pursuant to their missions: Federal Universities (FU), National Research Universities (NRU), Flagship Universities (FlU) and university-participants of the Russian Academic Excellence Project (Project 5-100). The indicators for the comparative analysis are aggregated by the type of activities and analyzed based on the calculation of median values and Displaced Ideal Method. The dataset can be helpful to researchers, university administration, specialists of higher education system, etc. Data processing can be executed using data mining methods, machine learning, and pattern analysis for the development of intellectual structures, applicable for university performance assessment in different educational systems. Presented data allows us to assert that the implementation of targeted support for leading Russian universities has a positive impact on the development of Russian higher education increasing its role on the international academic arena. Leading national research university-participants of the Project 5-100 had the greatest influence on increasing the competitiveness of Russian education in the world.

摘要

本文展示了93所俄罗斯大学的绩效数据集,该数据集收集于2015年至2018年,并根据24项指标进行评估。这些数据来自俄罗斯联邦科学与高等教育部在监测高等教育机构有效性过程中发布的材料、科学网(基于引文的研究分析工具InCites)和Scopus(基于引文的研究分析工具SciVal)数据库,以及来自国际排名机构QS、THE、ARWU的信息。该数据集包括根据不同国家高等教育系统发展水平比较分析的社会经济研究中使用的最重要指标对大学绩效的评估:教育、科研、国际、财务和经济绩效以及国际公众认可度(大学在主要国际排名中的位置)。评估的大学根据其使命进行分组:联邦大学(FU)、国家研究型大学(NRU)、旗舰大学(FlU)以及俄罗斯学术卓越计划(5-100计划)的参与大学。比较分析的指标按活动类型进行汇总,并基于中位数计算和位移理想方法进行分析。该数据集对研究人员、大学管理层、高等教育系统专家等可能会有所帮助。数据处理可以使用数据挖掘方法、机器学习和模式分析来进行,以开发适用于不同教育系统中大学绩效评估的智能结构。所呈现的数据使我们能够断言,对俄罗斯领先大学实施有针对性的支持对俄罗斯高等教育的发展具有积极影响,增强了其在国际学术舞台上的作用。5-100计划的领先国家研究型大学参与大学对提高俄罗斯教育在世界上的竞争力影响最大。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89c8/8713119/043e265a188a/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89c8/8713119/41815b4ded78/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89c8/8713119/f9cdd8e29df5/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89c8/8713119/d27a4db8389f/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89c8/8713119/b8f5bca7091a/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89c8/8713119/029eb4bd544b/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89c8/8713119/043e265a188a/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89c8/8713119/41815b4ded78/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89c8/8713119/f9cdd8e29df5/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89c8/8713119/d27a4db8389f/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89c8/8713119/b8f5bca7091a/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89c8/8713119/029eb4bd544b/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89c8/8713119/043e265a188a/gr6.jpg

相似文献

1
Key performance indicators of Russian universities for 2015-2018: Dataset and Benchmarking Data.2015 - 2018年俄罗斯大学的关键绩效指标:数据集与基准数据。
Data Brief. 2021 Dec 16;40:107695. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2021.107695. eCollection 2022 Feb.
2
Relationship between bibliometric indicators and university ranking positions.文献计量指标与大学排名位置之间的关系。
Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 30;13(1):14193. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-35306-1.
3
Inconsistent year-to-year fluctuations limit the conclusiveness of global higher education rankings for university management.逐年波动的不一致性限制了全球高等教育排名对大学管理的参考价值。
PeerJ. 2015 Aug 25;3:e1217. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1217. eCollection 2015.
4
Are university rankings useful to improve research? A systematic review.大学排名对提高研究质量是否有用?一项系统评价。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 7;13(3):e0193762. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193762. eCollection 2018.
5
Fighting trafficking of falsified and substandard medicinal products in Russia.打击俄罗斯假药和劣药的非法交易。
Int J Risk Saf Med. 2015;27 Suppl 1:S37-40. doi: 10.3233/JRS-150681.
6
Educational ranking of medical universities in Iran (ERMU).伊朗医科大学教育排名(ERMU)。
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2018 Dec 17;32:126. doi: 10.14196/mjiri.32.126. eCollection 2018.
7
International ranking systems for universities and institutions: a critical appraisal.大学及机构的国际排名系统:批判性评估。
BMC Med. 2007 Oct 25;5:30. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-5-30.
8
Quantifying the publication preferences of leading research universities.量化顶尖研究型大学的发表偏好。
Scientometrics. 2021;126(3):2269-2310. doi: 10.1007/s11192-020-03790-1. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
9
Research Ranking of Iranian Universities of Medical Sciences Based on International Indicators: An Experience From I.R. of Iran.基于国际指标的伊朗医科大学研究排名:来自伊朗伊斯兰共和国的经验
Arch Iran Med. 2017 Nov 1;20(11):673-679.
10
Profiles not metrics: the case of Brazilian universities.关注表现,而非指标:巴西大学的案例。
An Acad Bras Cienc. 2021 Sep 3;93(4):e29290261. doi: 10.1590/0001-3765202120200261. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
[Not Available].[无可用内容]
Tunis Med. 2023 Dec 5;101(12):871-878.
2
Baccalaureate nursing education institutions' key performance indicators: a review of the existing indicators and qualitative analysis of expert interviews.本科护理教育机构的关键绩效指标:现有指标综述及专家访谈的定性分析
BMC Nurs. 2023 Oct 5;22(1):357. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01484-6.

本文引用的文献

1
The Continuing Growth of Global Cooperation Networks in Research: A Conundrum for National Governments.全球研究合作网络的持续增长:各国政府面临的难题
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 21;10(7):e0131816. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131816. eCollection 2015.