Wagner Caroline S, Park Han Woo, Leydesdorff Loet
Milton & Roslyn Wolf Chair in International Affairs, John Glenn School of Public Affairs, and Director, Battelle Center for Science & Technology Policy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.
Department of Media & Communication, YeungNam University, Dae-dong, Gyeongsan-si, Gyeongsangbuk-do, South Korea.
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 21;10(7):e0131816. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131816. eCollection 2015.
Global collaboration continues to grow as a share of all scientific cooperation, measured as coauthorships of peer-reviewed, published papers. The percent of all scientific papers that are internationally coauthored has more than doubled in 20 years, and they account for all the growth in output among the scientifically advanced countries. Emerging countries, particularly China, have increased their participation in global science, in part by doubling their spending on R&D; they are increasingly likely to appear as partners on internationally coauthored scientific papers. Given the growth of connections at the international level, it is helpful to examine the phenomenon as a communications network and to consider the network as a new organization on the world stage that adds to and complements national systems. When examined as interconnections across the globe over two decades, a global network has grown denser but not more clustered, meaning there are many more connections but they are not grouping into exclusive 'cliques'. This suggests that power relationships are not reproducing those of the political system. The network has features an open system, attracting productive scientists to participate in international projects. National governments could gain efficiencies and influence by developing policies and strategies designed to maximize network benefits-a model different from those designed for national systems.
作为所有科学合作的一部分,全球合作(以同行评审并发表的论文合著情况来衡量)持续增长。国际合著的科学论文在所有科学论文中所占的比例在20年内增长了一倍多,而且它们占科学发达国家产出增长的全部份额。新兴国家,尤其是中国,增加了对全球科学的参与度,部分原因是研发支出翻了一番;它们越来越有可能作为国际合著科学论文的合作伙伴出现。鉴于国际层面联系的增长,将这一现象作为一个通信网络来审视,并将该网络视为世界舞台上一个新的组织,它补充并完善国家体系,这是很有帮助的。当把全球网络看作是二十多年来全球范围内的互联时,它变得更加密集但并没有更集中,这意味着有更多的联系,但它们并没有形成排他性的“小团体”。这表明权力关系并没有重现政治体系的权力关系。该网络具有开放系统的特征,吸引有成果的科学家参与国际项目。各国政府可以通过制定旨在使网络效益最大化的政策和战略来提高效率并发挥影响力——这是一种不同于为国家体系设计的模式。