• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

BI 695502联合化疗对比贝伐单抗参比制剂联合化疗用于晚期非鳞状非小细胞肺癌患者的3期试验

Phase 3 Trial of BI 695502 Plus Chemotherapy Versus Bevacizumab Reference Product Plus Chemotherapy in Patients With Advanced Nonsquamous NSCLC.

作者信息

Kim Edward S, Balser Sigrid, Rohr Klaus B, Lohmann Ragna, Liedert Bernd, Schliephake Dorothee

机构信息

City of Hope National Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.

Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Ingelheim, Germany.

出版信息

JTO Clin Res Rep. 2021 Oct 28;3(1):100248. doi: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2021.100248. eCollection 2022 Jan.

DOI:10.1016/j.jtocrr.2021.100248
PMID:34993498
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8713120/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Biological therapies such as bevacizumab have improved survival in patients with NSCLC. This study was conducted to confirm the equivalent efficacy of the biosimilar candidate BI 695502 to the bevacizumab reference product (RP).

METHODS

In this phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial of adult patients with recurrent or metastatic NSCLC received up to 18 weeks of induction treatment with BI 695502 or bevacizumab RP 15 mg/kg plus paclitaxel and carboplatin. Subsequent maintenance therapy comprised BI 695502 or bevacizumab RP monotherapy until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was the best overall response rate (ORR) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 assessed by central imaging review, until 18 weeks after the start of treatment.

RESULTS

In total, 671 patients were randomized at one-to-one ratio to BI 695502 or bevacizumab RP, of whom 335 and 328, respectively, received treatment. Of these, 228 (68.1%) and 256 (78.0%), respectively, proceeded to maintenance monotherapy. A manufacturing issue led to a small number of patients treated with BI 695502 switching to bevacizumab RP late in the study. The primary end point, best ORR, was 54.0% in the BI 695502 group and 63.1% in the bevacizumab RP group. The 90% confidence interval for the between-group ratio of best ORR (0.770 to 0.951) was within the prespecified range for equivalence (0.736-1.359). Adverse events were class-related and similar between the two treatment arms.

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed equivalent ORR after 18 weeks of treatment with BI 695502 or bevacizumab RP, with similar adverse event profiles.

摘要

简介

贝伐单抗等生物疗法已改善了非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的生存率。本研究旨在证实生物类似药候选药物BI 695502与贝伐单抗参比产品(RP)的等效疗效。

方法

在这项针对复发或转移性NSCLC成年患者的3期多中心随机双盲试验中,患者接受了长达18周的诱导治疗,使用BI 695502或贝伐单抗RP 15 mg/kg加紫杉醇和卡铂。随后的维持治疗包括BI 695502或贝伐单抗RP单药治疗,直至疾病进展或出现不可接受的毒性。主要终点是根据实体瘤疗效评价标准1.1版,通过中心影像评估的最佳总体缓解率(ORR),直至治疗开始后18周。

结果

总共671例患者按1:1比例随机分配至BI 695502或贝伐单抗RP组,其中分别有335例和328例接受了治疗。其中,分别有228例(68.1%)和256例(78.0%)进入维持单药治疗。一个生产问题导致少数接受BI 695502治疗的患者在研究后期改用贝伐单抗RP。主要终点,即最佳ORR,在BI 695502组中为54.0%,在贝伐单抗RP组中为63.1%。最佳ORR组间比值的90%置信区间(0.770至0.951)在预先设定的等效范围内(0.736 - 1.359)。不良事件与类别相关,两个治疗组相似。

结论

本研究显示,使用BI 695502或贝伐单抗RP治疗18周后,ORR相当,不良事件谱相似。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f958/8713120/e93685212f79/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f958/8713120/435e27dcb186/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f958/8713120/30ac29dcf1e2/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f958/8713120/e93685212f79/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f958/8713120/435e27dcb186/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f958/8713120/30ac29dcf1e2/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f958/8713120/e93685212f79/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
Phase 3 Trial of BI 695502 Plus Chemotherapy Versus Bevacizumab Reference Product Plus Chemotherapy in Patients With Advanced Nonsquamous NSCLC.BI 695502联合化疗对比贝伐单抗参比制剂联合化疗用于晚期非鳞状非小细胞肺癌患者的3期试验
JTO Clin Res Rep. 2021 Oct 28;3(1):100248. doi: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2021.100248. eCollection 2022 Jan.
2
Efficacy and Safety of Bevacizumab Biosimilar FKB238 Versus Originator Bevacizumab: Results from AVANA, a Phase III Trial in Patients with Non-Squamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (non-sq-NSCLC).贝伐珠单抗生物类似药 FKB238 与原研药贝伐珠单抗的疗效和安全性:AVANA 研究的结果,这是一项针对非鳞状非小细胞肺癌(非鳞 NSCLC)患者的 III 期试验。
BioDrugs. 2021 Jul;35(4):417-428. doi: 10.1007/s40259-021-00489-4. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
3
Phase III double-blind study comparing the efficacy and safety of proposed biosimilar MYL-1402O and reference bevacizumab in stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer.一项III期双盲研究,比较拟用生物类似药MYL-1402O与参比药贝伐珠单抗在IV期非小细胞肺癌中的疗效和安全性。
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2021 Nov 18;13:17588359211045845. doi: 10.1177/17588359211045845. eCollection 2021.
4
A phase III, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study to compare the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity between SB8 (proposed bevacizumab biosimilar) and reference bevacizumab in patients with metastatic or recurrent nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer.一项III期、随机、双盲、多中心研究,旨在比较SB8(拟用的贝伐单抗生物类似药)与参比贝伐单抗在转移性或复发性非鳞状非小细胞肺癌患者中的疗效、安全性、药代动力学和免疫原性。
Lung Cancer. 2020 Aug;146:12-18. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2020.05.027. Epub 2020 May 28.
5
Efficacy, Safety and Immunogenicity of MB02 (Bevacizumab Biosimilar) versus Reference Bevacizumab in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Study (STELLA).MB02(贝伐珠单抗生物类似药)对比参照贝伐珠单抗在晚期非小细胞肺癌中的疗效、安全性和免疫原性:一项随机、双盲、III 期研究(STELLA)。
BioDrugs. 2021 Jul;35(4):429-444. doi: 10.1007/s40259-021-00483-w. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
6
Efficacy and Safety of the Biosimilar ABP 215 Compared with Bevacizumab in Patients with Advanced Nonsquamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (MAPLE): A Randomized, Double-blind, Phase III Study.ABP 215 与贝伐珠单抗在晚期非鳞状非小细胞肺癌患者中的疗效和安全性比较(MAPLE):一项随机、双盲、III 期研究。
Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Apr 1;25(7):2088-2095. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-2702. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
7
Randomized double-blind clinical trial comparing safety and efficacy of the biosimilar BCD-021 with reference bevacizumab.随机双盲临床试验比较了生物类似药 BCD-021 与参照用贝伐珠单抗的安全性和疗效。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Feb 1;22(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09243-7.
8
Biosimilar candidate IBI305 plus paclitaxel/carboplatin for the treatment of non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer.生物类似药候选药物 IBI305 联合紫杉醇/卡铂用于治疗非鳞状非小细胞肺癌。
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2019 Dec;8(6):989-999. doi: 10.21037/tlcr.2019.12.23.
9
BEYOND: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter, Phase III Study of First-Line Carboplatin/Paclitaxel Plus Bevacizumab or Placebo in Chinese Patients With Advanced or Recurrent Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.贝伐珠单抗联合卡铂/紫杉醇对比安慰剂一线治疗晚期或复发性非鳞状非小细胞肺癌的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、多中心 III 期临床研究(BEYOND 研究)
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jul 1;33(19):2197-204. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.4424. Epub 2015 May 26.
10
PRONOUNCE: randomized, open-label, phase III study of first-line pemetrexed + carboplatin followed by maintenance pemetrexed versus paclitaxel + carboplatin + bevacizumab followed by maintenance bevacizumab in patients ith advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer.发音:一项随机、开放标签的III期研究,比较一线培美曲塞+卡铂序贯培美曲塞维持治疗与紫杉醇+卡铂+贝伐单抗序贯贝伐单抗维持治疗在晚期非鳞状非小细胞肺癌患者中的疗效。 (注:原文中“ith”应改为“with”)
J Thorac Oncol. 2015 Jan;10(1):134-42. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000366.

引用本文的文献

1
Biosimilar monoclonal antibodies for cancer treatment in adults.用于成人癌症治疗的生物类似单克隆抗体。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 28;11(11):CD013539. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013539.pub2.
2
Efficacy and Safety of Biosimilar SCT510 Compared with Bevacizumab for the First-Line Treatment of Advanced Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Study.SCT510 生物类似药与贝伐珠单抗用于晚期非鳞状非小细胞肺癌一线治疗的疗效和安全性:一项随机、双盲、III 期研究。
Adv Ther. 2024 Nov;41(11):4032-4048. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-02965-z. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
3
Monoclonal antibody biosimilars for cancer treatment.

本文引用的文献

1
A Phase I, Randomized, Single-Dose Study Evaluating the Biosimilarity of TAB008 to Bevacizumab in Healthy Volunteers.一项评估TAB008与贝伐单抗在健康志愿者中生物相似性的I期随机单剂量研究。
Front Pharmacol. 2019 Aug 15;10:905. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00905. eCollection 2019.
2
PF-06439535 (a Bevacizumab Biosimilar) Compared with Reference Bevacizumab (Avastin), Both Plus Paclitaxel and Carboplatin, as First-Line Treatment for Advanced Non-Squamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Randomized, Double-Blind Study.PF-06439535(贝伐珠单抗生物类似药)联合紫杉醇和卡铂对比贝伐珠单抗(阿瓦斯汀)联合紫杉醇和卡铂一线治疗晚期非鳞状非小细胞肺癌:一项随机、双盲研究。
BioDrugs. 2019 Oct;33(5):555-570. doi: 10.1007/s40259-019-00363-4.
3
用于癌症治疗的单克隆抗体生物类似药。
iScience. 2024 May 24;27(6):110115. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110115. eCollection 2024 Jun 21.
4
Clinical Benefit, Price, and Uptake for Cancer Biosimilars vs Reference Drugs in China: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.中国癌症生物类似药与参照药的临床获益、价格和采用情况:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Oct 2;6(10):e2337348. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.37348.
5
Comparison of efficacy and safety of bevacizumab biosimilar and original bevacizumab in non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.贝伐单抗生物类似药与原研贝伐单抗在非鳞状非小细胞肺癌中的疗效和安全性比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Transl Cancer Res. 2022 Jun;11(6):1472-1482. doi: 10.21037/tcr-22-71.
Efficacy and Safety of the Biosimilar ABP 215 Compared with Bevacizumab in Patients with Advanced Nonsquamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (MAPLE): A Randomized, Double-blind, Phase III Study.
ABP 215 与贝伐珠单抗在晚期非鳞状非小细胞肺癌患者中的疗效和安全性比较(MAPLE):一项随机、双盲、III 期研究。
Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Apr 1;25(7):2088-2095. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-2702. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
4
Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.全球癌症统计数据 2018:GLOBOCAN 对全球 185 个国家/地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率的估计。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
5
Bevacizumab biosimilars: scientific justification for extrapolation of indications.贝伐珠单抗生物类似药:适应证外推的科学依据。
Future Oncol. 2018 Oct;14(24):2507-2520. doi: 10.2217/fon-2018-0051. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
6
Progress and prospects of early detection in lung cancer.肺癌早期检测的进展与展望。
Open Biol. 2017 Sep;7(9). doi: 10.1098/rsob.170070.
7
Bevacizumab in Colorectal Cancer: Current Role in Treatment and the Potential of Biosimilars.贝伐珠单抗在结直肠癌中的应用:治疗中的现有角色和生物类似药的潜力。
Target Oncol. 2017 Oct;12(5):599-610. doi: 10.1007/s11523-017-0518-1.
8
A randomized, single-blind, Phase I trial (INVICTAN-1) assessing the bioequivalence and safety of BI 695502, a bevacizumab biosimilar candidate, in healthy subjects.一项评估贝伐单抗生物类似药候选药物BI 695502在健康受试者中的生物等效性和安全性的随机、单盲I期试验(INVICTAN-1)。
Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2017 Aug;26(8):889-896. doi: 10.1080/13543784.2017.1347635. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
9
The Language of Biosimilars: Clarification, Definitions, and Regulatory Aspects.生物类似药的语言:阐释、定义及监管方面
Drugs. 2017 Apr;77(6):671-677. doi: 10.1007/s40265-017-0717-1.
10
Biological therapies in nonsmall cell lung cancer.非小细胞肺癌的生物治疗。
Eur Respir J. 2017 Mar 2;49(3). doi: 10.1183/13993003.01520-2016. Print 2017 Mar.