• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国急性缺血性脑卒中血管内治疗延迟的生活质量及成本后果

Quality of life and cost consequence of delays in endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke in China.

作者信息

Ni Weiyi, Kunz Wolfgang G, Goyal Mayank, Chen Lijin, Jiang Yawen

机构信息

Department of Pharmaceutical and Health Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Health Econ Rev. 2022 Jan 6;12(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s13561-021-00352-w.

DOI:10.1186/s13561-021-00352-w
PMID:34993675
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8740348/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although endovascular therapy (EVT) improves clinical outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke, the time of EVT initiation significantly influences clinical outcomes and healthcare costs. This study evaluated the impact of EVT treatment delay on cost-effectiveness in China.

METHODS

A model combining a short-term decision tree and long-term Markov health state transition matrix was constructed. For each time window of symptom onset to EVT, the probability of receiving EVT or non-EVT treatment was varied, thereby varying clinical outcomes and healthcare costs. Clinical outcomes and cost data were derived from clinical trials and literature. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio and incremental net monetary benefits were simulated. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of the model. The willingness-to-pay threshold per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) was set to ¥71,000 ($10,281).

RESULTS

EVT performed between 61 and 120 min after the stroke onset was most cost-effective comparing to other time windows to perform EVT among AIS patients in China, with an ICER of ¥16,409/QALY ($2376) for performing EVT at 61-120 min versus the time window of 301-360 min. Each hour delay in EVT resulted in an average loss of 0.45 QALYs and 165.02 healthy days, with an average net monetary loss of ¥15,105 ($2187).

CONCLUSIONS

Earlier treatment of acute ischemic stroke patients with EVT in China increases lifetime QALYs and the economic value of care without any net increase in lifetime costs. Thus, healthcare policies should aim to improve efficiency of pre-hospital and in-hospital workflow processes to reduce the onset-to-puncture duration in China.

摘要

背景

尽管血管内治疗(EVT)可改善急性缺血性脑卒中患者的临床结局,但开始EVT的时间对临床结局和医疗成本有显著影响。本研究评估了在中国EVT治疗延迟对成本效益的影响。

方法

构建了一个结合短期决策树和长期马尔可夫健康状态转换矩阵的模型。对于症状发作至EVT的每个时间窗,接受EVT或非EVT治疗的概率各不相同,从而使临床结局和医疗成本有所不同。临床结局和成本数据来源于临床试验和文献。模拟了增量成本效益比和增量净货币效益。进行了确定性和概率性敏感性分析以评估模型的稳健性。将每质量调整生命年(QALY)的支付意愿阈值设定为71,000元人民币(10,281美元)。

结果

与中国急性缺血性脑卒中(AIS)患者进行EVT的其他时间窗相比,在卒中发作后61至120分钟进行EVT最具成本效益,在61 - 120分钟进行EVT与301 - 360分钟时间窗相比,增量成本效益比为16,409元人民币/QALY(2376美元)。EVT每延迟一小时平均损失0.45个QALY和165.02个健康日,平均净货币损失为15,105元人民币(2187美元)。

结论

在中国,对急性缺血性脑卒中患者尽早进行EVT治疗可增加终身QALY和护理的经济价值,而不会使终身成本有任何净增加。因此,医疗政策应旨在提高院前和院内工作流程的效率,以缩短中国从发病到穿刺的时间。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f62b/8740348/55bf9828eca2/13561_2021_352_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f62b/8740348/47b1a0fa37b2/13561_2021_352_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f62b/8740348/54164110b082/13561_2021_352_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f62b/8740348/55bf9828eca2/13561_2021_352_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f62b/8740348/47b1a0fa37b2/13561_2021_352_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f62b/8740348/54164110b082/13561_2021_352_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f62b/8740348/55bf9828eca2/13561_2021_352_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Quality of life and cost consequence of delays in endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke in China.中国急性缺血性脑卒中血管内治疗延迟的生活质量及成本后果
Health Econ Rev. 2022 Jan 6;12(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s13561-021-00352-w.
2
Lifetime quality of life and cost consequences of delays in endovascular treatment for acute ischaemic stroke: a cost-effectiveness analysis from a Singapore healthcare perspective.急性缺血性卒中血管内治疗延迟对终身生活质量和成本的影响:从新加坡医疗保健角度进行的成本效益分析。
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 17;10(9):e036517. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036517.
3
Cost-effectiveness of endovascular thrombectomy in acute stroke patients with large ischemic core.血管内血栓切除术治疗大核心梗死急性脑卒中患者的成本效果分析。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2023 Nov;15(e2):e166-e171. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2022-019460. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
4
Cost-effectiveness of remote robotic mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke.急性缺血性卒中远程机器人机械取栓术的成本效益
J Neurosurg. 2023 Jan 20;139(3):721-731. doi: 10.3171/2022.12.JNS222115. Print 2023 Sep 1.
5
Cost-Effectiveness of Endovascular Stroke Therapy: A Patient Subgroup Analysis From a US Healthcare Perspective.血管内卒中治疗的成本效益:从美国医疗保健视角进行的患者亚组分析
Stroke. 2016 Nov;47(11):2797-2804. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.014147. Epub 2016 Oct 6.
6
Cost-effectiveness of endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke in China: evidence from Shandong Peninsula.中国急性缺血性脑卒中血管内治疗的成本效益:来自山东半岛的证据。
Health Econ Rev. 2024 Jun 5;14(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s13561-024-00513-7.
7
Cost-effectiveness of endovascular treatment versus best medical management in basilar artery occlusion stroke: A U.S. healthcare perspective.基底动脉闭塞性脑卒中血管内治疗与最佳药物治疗的成本效益:美国医疗保健视角。
Eur Stroke J. 2024 Mar;9(1):97-104. doi: 10.1177/23969873231209616. Epub 2023 Oct 31.
8
Cost-effectiveness of endovascular thrombectomy with alteplase versus endovascular thrombectomy alone for acute ischemic stroke secondary to large vessel occlusion.血管内溶栓联合阿替普酶与单纯血管内取栓治疗大动脉闭塞性急性缺血性脑卒中的成本效果分析。
CMAJ Open. 2023 May 16;11(3):E443-E450. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20220096. Print 2023 May-Jun.
9
Cost-effectiveness analysis of endovascular treatment with or without intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke.血管内治疗伴或不伴静脉溶栓治疗急性缺血性脑卒中的成本效果分析。
J Neurosurg. 2022 Jun 10;138(1):223-232. doi: 10.3171/2022.4.JNS22514. Print 2023 Jan 1.
10
Cost-effectiveness of endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke with established large infarct in Germany: a decision tree and Markov model.德国针对已形成大面积梗死的急性缺血性卒中进行血管内血栓切除术的成本效益:决策树和马尔可夫模型
J Neurointerv Surg. 2025 Jun 16;17(7):683-690. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2024-021837.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictors and Correlates of Prehospital Delay Among Acute Stroke Patients in Thiruvananthapuram District, Kerala: A Cross-Sectional Survey.喀拉拉邦特里凡得琅地区急性中风患者院前延误的预测因素及相关因素:一项横断面调查
Cureus. 2025 Mar 1;17(3):e79900. doi: 10.7759/cureus.79900. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Measuring the health outcomes of Chinese ischemic stroke patients based on the data from a longitudinal multi-center study.基于一项纵向多中心研究的数据评估中国缺血性中风患者的健康结局。
Qual Life Res. 2025 Mar 27. doi: 10.1007/s11136-025-03957-4.
3
Cost-effectiveness of endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke in China: evidence from Shandong Peninsula.

本文引用的文献

1
Lifetime quality of life and cost consequences of delays in endovascular treatment for acute ischaemic stroke: a cost-effectiveness analysis from a Singapore healthcare perspective.急性缺血性卒中血管内治疗延迟对终身生活质量和成本的影响:从新加坡医疗保健角度进行的成本效益分析。
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 17;10(9):e036517. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036517.
2
Public health and cost consequences of time delays to thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke.急性缺血性脑卒中取栓治疗时间延误的公共卫生和成本后果。
Neurology. 2020 Nov 3;95(18):e2465-e2475. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000010867. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
3
Dependency and health utilities in stroke: Data to inform cost-effectiveness analyses.
中国急性缺血性脑卒中血管内治疗的成本效益:来自山东半岛的证据。
Health Econ Rev. 2024 Jun 5;14(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s13561-024-00513-7.
4
Cost-effectiveness of edaravone dexborneol versus human urinary kallidinogenase for acute ischemic stroke in China.依达拉奉右莰醇与注射用尤瑞克林在中国急性缺血性脑卒中治疗中的成本效益分析
Health Econ Rev. 2024 Jan 29;14(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s13561-024-00479-6.
5
Economic evaluation of stent retrievers in basilar artery occlusion: An analysis from Chinese healthcare system perspective.支架取栓器在基底动脉闭塞中的经济学评价:基于中国医疗体系视角的分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 30;18(11):e0294929. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294929. eCollection 2023.
6
Endovascular treatment for basilar artery occlusion: a cost-effectiveness analysis based on a meta-analysis.基底动脉闭塞的血管内治疗:基于荟萃分析的成本效益分析
Front Neurol. 2023 Oct 20;14:1267554. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1267554. eCollection 2023.
中风中的依赖性与健康效用:为成本效益分析提供信息的数据。
Eur Stroke J. 2017 Mar;2(1):70-76. doi: 10.1177/2396987316683780. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
4
Cost-effectiveness analysis of mechanical thrombectomy with stent retriever in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke in Italy.意大利使用支架取栓器进行机械取栓治疗急性缺血性卒中的成本效益分析。
J Med Econ. 2018 Sep;21(9):902-911. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2018.1484748. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
5
Cost-effectiveness of mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: an Australian payer perspective.急性缺血性中风机械取栓术的成本效益:澳大利亚医保支付方视角
J Med Econ. 2018 Aug;21(8):799-809. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2018.1474746. Epub 2018 May 30.
6
Cost-effectiveness of mechanical thrombectomy within 6 hours of acute ischaemic stroke in China.中国急性缺血性卒中6小时内机械取栓术的成本效益
BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 22;8(2):e018951. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018951.
7
Clinical Imaging Factors Associated With Infarct Progression in Patients With Ischemic Stroke During Transfer for Mechanical Thrombectomy.缺血性中风患者在机械取栓转运过程中与梗死进展相关的临床影像因素。
JAMA Neurol. 2017 Nov 1;74(11):1361-1367. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.2149.
8
Long-term cost-effectiveness of thrombectomy for acute ischaemic stroke in real life: An analysis based on data from the Swedish Stroke Register (Riksstroke).真实世界中急性缺血性脑卒中取栓治疗的长期成本效益:基于瑞典脑卒中注册登记(Riksstroke)数据的分析。
Int J Stroke. 2017 Oct;12(8):802-814. doi: 10.1177/1747493017701154. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
9
Cost-Effectiveness of Solitaire Stent Retriever Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Results From the SWIFT-PRIME Trial (Solitaire With the Intention for Thrombectomy as Primary Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke).Solitaire支架取栓术治疗急性缺血性卒中的成本效益:SWIFT-PRIME试验(以取栓术为急性缺血性卒中主要血管内治疗手段的Solitaire)结果
Stroke. 2017 Feb;48(2):379-387. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.014735. Epub 2016 Dec 27.
10
Cost-Effectiveness of Endovascular Stroke Therapy: A Patient Subgroup Analysis From a US Healthcare Perspective.血管内卒中治疗的成本效益:从美国医疗保健视角进行的患者亚组分析
Stroke. 2016 Nov;47(11):2797-2804. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.014147. Epub 2016 Oct 6.