• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Authors' reply to: "The long-term recurrence rate of minimally invasive methods in pilonidal sinus disease therapy is still unclear".

作者信息

Basso L, Gallo G, Milone M, Pietroletti R

机构信息

"Pietro Valdoni" Department of Surgery, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Policlinico "Umberto I", viale del Policlinico 155, 00161, Rome, Italy.

Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences, "Magna Graecia" University, Catanzaro, Italy.

出版信息

Tech Coloproctol. 2022 Feb;26(2):159-160. doi: 10.1007/s10151-021-02559-9. Epub 2022 Jan 7.

DOI:10.1007/s10151-021-02559-9
PMID:34993687
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Authors' reply to: "The long-term recurrence rate of minimally invasive methods in pilonidal sinus disease therapy is still unclear".作者对《藏毛窦疾病治疗中微创方法的长期复发率仍不明确》的回复
Tech Coloproctol. 2022 Feb;26(2):159-160. doi: 10.1007/s10151-021-02559-9. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
2
The long-term recurrence rate of minimally invasive methods in pilonidal sinus disease therapy is still unclear.藏毛窦疾病治疗中微创方法的长期复发率仍不明确。
Tech Coloproctol. 2022 Feb;26(2):157-158. doi: 10.1007/s10151-021-02509-5. Epub 2021 Aug 26.
3
Laser ablation: a unique and beneficial therapeutic option for pilonidal sinus? And the potential for further innovation-a review.激光消融：一种独特且有益的治疗肛旁窦的选择？以及进一步创新的潜力——综述。
Lasers Med Sci. 2023 May 18;38(1):124. doi: 10.1007/s10103-023-03788-0.
4
Moving Toward Minimally Invasive Treatments and Better Risk Characterization for Pilonidal Disease-Reply.
JAMA Surg. 2024 Jan 1;159(1):116-117. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.4408.
5
Pilonidal sinus disease: a brief guide for primary care.藏毛窦疾病：基层医疗简要指南
Br J Gen Pract. 2023 Dec 28;74(738):44-45. doi: 10.3399/bjgp24X736113. Print 2024 Jan.
6
Bascom's cleft lift procedure for pilonidal sinus disease - a video vignette.用于藏毛窦疾病的巴斯科姆氏裂隙提升术——视频简介
Colorectal Dis. 2023 Sep;25(9):1938-1939. doi: 10.1111/codi.16701. Epub 2023 Aug 3.
7
Safety and Efficacy of Minimally Invasive Video-Assisted Ablation of Pilonidal Sinus: A Randomized Clinical Trial.微创视频辅助切除藏毛窦的安全性和有效性：一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Surg. 2016 Jun 1;151(6):547-53. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.5233.
8
Long-term results of endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment vs Limberg flap for treatment of difficult cases of complicated pilonidal disease: a prospective, nonrandomized study.内镜下治疗与 Limberg 皮瓣治疗复杂难处理藏毛窦病的长期疗效比较：一项前瞻性、非随机研究。
Colorectal Dis. 2020 Mar;22(3):319-324. doi: 10.1111/codi.14857. Epub 2019 Oct 6.
9
Endoscopic Pilonidal Sinus Treatment: Long-Term Results of a Prospective Series.内镜下藏毛窦治疗：一项前瞻性系列研究的长期结果
JSLS. 2017 Jul-Sep;21(3). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2017.00043.
10
Outcomes of minimally invasive endoscopic pilonidal sinus surgery.微创内镜肛门窦切开术的结果。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2020 Jul;13(3):324-328. doi: 10.1111/ases.12748. Epub 2019 Aug 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Editorial: Management and Treatment of Pilonidal Disease: 189 Years After Mayo.社论：藏毛疾病的管理与治疗：梅奥报告189年后
Front Surg. 2022 Jun 14;9:950793. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.950793. eCollection 2022.
2
The impact of experience on recurrence rates after biopsy punch excision for pilonidal disease.经验对皮隆尼病活检冲孔切除后复发率的影响。
Colorectal Dis. 2022 Aug;24(8):984-991. doi: 10.1111/codi.16126. Epub 2022 May 15.

本文引用的文献

1
The long-term recurrence rate of minimally invasive methods in pilonidal sinus disease therapy is still unclear.藏毛窦疾病治疗中微创方法的长期复发率仍不明确。
Tech Coloproctol. 2022 Feb;26(2):157-158. doi: 10.1007/s10151-021-02509-5. Epub 2021 Aug 26.
2
Consensus statement of the Italian society of colorectal surgery (SICCR): management and treatment of pilonidal disease.意大利结直肠外科学会（SICCR）共识声明：藏毛窦疾病的处理和治疗。
Tech Coloproctol. 2021 Dec;25(12):1269-1280. doi: 10.1007/s10151-021-02487-8. Epub 2021 Jun 27.
3
Long-term results of a randomized clinical trial comparing endoscopic versus conventional treatment of pilonidal sinus.
内镜与传统治疗藏毛窦的随机临床试验的长期结果比较。
Int J Surg. 2020 Feb;74:81-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.12.033. Epub 2020 Jan 9.
4
Long-term results of endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment vs Limberg flap for treatment of difficult cases of complicated pilonidal disease: a prospective, nonrandomized study.内镜下治疗与 Limberg 皮瓣治疗复杂难处理藏毛窦病的长期疗效比较：一项前瞻性、非随机研究。
Colorectal Dis. 2020 Mar;22(3):319-324. doi: 10.1111/codi.14857. Epub 2019 Oct 6.
5
Long-term follow-up for pilonidal sinus surgery: A review of literature with metanalysis.藏毛窦手术的长期随访：文献综述与荟萃分析
Surgeon. 2018 Oct;16(5):315-320. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2018.03.009. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
6
New evidence pyramid.新的证据金字塔
Evid Based Med. 2016 Aug;21(4):125-7. doi: 10.1136/ebmed-2016-110401. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
7
Pilonidal sinus disease guidelines: a minefield?藏毛窦疾病指南：雷区？
Tech Coloproctol. 2016 Apr;20(4):263-4. doi: 10.1007/s10151-015-1398-y. Epub 2015 Dec 17.