• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内镜下治疗与 Limberg 皮瓣治疗复杂难处理藏毛窦病的长期疗效比较:一项前瞻性、非随机研究。

Long-term results of endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment vs Limberg flap for treatment of difficult cases of complicated pilonidal disease: a prospective, nonrandomized study.

机构信息

Department of Medical Education, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.

3rd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.

出版信息

Colorectal Dis. 2020 Mar;22(3):319-324. doi: 10.1111/codi.14857. Epub 2019 Oct 6.

DOI:10.1111/codi.14857
PMID:31532869
Abstract

AIM

To present the results of a prospective, nonrandomized comparative study on the treatment of complicated pilonidal sinus by endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment (EPSiT) compared with Limberg flap surgery, based on experience of a single surgical centre.

METHOD

A prospective, nonrandomized comparative study. Long-term follow-up of 62 patients with complicated pilonidal disease was analysed (36 operated on using the Limberg flap technique and 26 using the EPSiT method). The median follow-up was 27 months (12-44).

RESULTS

The median operating time in the EPSiT group was 60 min (25-80 min) and in the Limberg group 67 min (35-95 min). In the EPSiT group, primary healing was achieved in 22 out of 26 patients (84.6%) in a median of 42 days with a total complication rate of 11.5%. There were seven recurrences after initial healing. The total success rate of the EPSiT procedure with long-term follow-up was 57.7%. In the Limberg flap group, all patients healed (100%) in a median of 21 days. The complication rate in this group was 26.5%, and there were two recurrences in this group. The total success rate of the Limberg flap procedure was 94.1%.

CONCLUSION

For patients with complicated pilonidal sinus, the endoscopic procedure has a significantly lower success rate than the Limberg flap procedure, but a lower risk of complications. Such patients should be offered a choice between a safer, minimally invasive procedure with a higher risk of recurrence or flap surgery, which is more effective, but with a higher risk of complications.

摘要

目的

介绍一项由单一外科中心开展的前瞻性、非随机对照研究结果,该研究比较了内镜下治疗(EPSiT)与 Limberg 皮瓣手术治疗复杂性藏毛窦的效果。

方法

前瞻性、非随机对照研究。对 62 例复杂性藏毛窦患者进行了长期随访(36 例采用 Limberg 皮瓣技术,26 例采用 EPSiT 方法)。中位随访时间为 27 个月(12-44 个月)。

结果

EPSiT 组的中位手术时间为 60 分钟(25-80 分钟),Limberg 组为 67 分钟(35-95 分钟)。在 EPSiT 组中,26 例患者中有 22 例(84.6%)在中位 42 天内实现了一期愈合,总并发症发生率为 11.5%。初始愈合后有 7 例复发。长期随访时 EPSiT 手术的总成功率为 57.7%。在 Limberg 皮瓣组,所有患者均在中位 21 天内愈合(100%)。该组的并发症发生率为 26.5%,且有 2 例复发。Limberg 皮瓣手术的总成功率为 94.1%。

结论

对于复杂性藏毛窦患者,内镜手术的成功率明显低于 Limberg 皮瓣手术,但并发症风险较低。应向此类患者提供选择,即选择一种复发风险较高但更安全、微创的手术,或选择一种更有效的皮瓣手术,但并发症风险较高。

相似文献

1
Long-term results of endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment vs Limberg flap for treatment of difficult cases of complicated pilonidal disease: a prospective, nonrandomized study.内镜下治疗与 Limberg 皮瓣治疗复杂难处理藏毛窦病的长期疗效比较:一项前瞻性、非随机研究。
Colorectal Dis. 2020 Mar;22(3):319-324. doi: 10.1111/codi.14857. Epub 2019 Oct 6.
2
Sinus laser closure (SiLaC) versus Limberg flap in management of pilonidal disease: A short-term non-randomized comparative prospective study.鼻窦激光闭合术(SiLaC)与 Limberg 皮瓣在肛门疾病治疗中的比较:一项短期非随机前瞻性研究。
Asian J Surg. 2022 Jan;45(1):179-183. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2021.04.026. Epub 2021 May 6.
3
Comparison of modified limberg flap and modified elliptical rotation flap for pilonidal sinus surgery: a retrospective cohort study.改良 Limberg 皮瓣与改良椭圆旋转皮瓣治疗藏毛窦的比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2015 Apr;16(Pt A):74-77. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.02.024. Epub 2015 Mar 7.
4
Comparison of short-term results between the modified Karydakis flap and the modified Limberg flap in the management of pilonidal sinus disease: a randomized controlled study.改良 Karydakis 皮瓣与改良 Limberg 皮瓣治疗藏毛窦病的短期疗效比较:一项随机对照研究。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 Apr;56(4):491-8. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31828006f7.
5
[Results of the Limberg flap procedure in acute and chronic pilonidal abscesses].[Limberg皮瓣手术治疗急慢性藏毛窦脓肿的结果]
Chirurg. 2022 Feb;93(2):182-189. doi: 10.1007/s00104-021-01439-0. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
6
A minimally invasive approach to pilonidal disease with endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment (EPSiT): a single-center case series with long-term results.内镜下治疗藏毛窦(EPSiT)治疗藏毛窦病的微创方法:一项单中心病例系列研究及长期结果。
Tech Coloproctol. 2021 Sep;25(9):1045-1054. doi: 10.1007/s10151-021-02477-w. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
7
Limberg flap procedure for pilonidal sinus disease: results of 353 patients.Limberg皮瓣手术治疗藏毛窦疾病:353例患者的结果
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2008 Mar;393(2):185-9. doi: 10.1007/s00423-007-0227-9. Epub 2007 Sep 22.
8
Treatment of adolescent pilonidal disease with a new modification to the Limberg flap: symmetrically rotated rhomboid excision and lateralization of the Limberg flap technique.应用 Limberg 皮瓣的改良术式(菱形切除并对称旋转皮瓣)治疗青少年藏毛窦病
J Pediatr Surg. 2013 Aug;48(8):1744-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.01.029.
9
Eyedrop-shaped, modified Limberg transposition flap in the treatment of pilonidal sinus disease.泪滴形改良Limberg转移皮瓣治疗藏毛窦疾病
Asian J Surg. 2015 Jul;38(3):161-7. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2015.03.007. Epub 2015 Apr 23.
10
[Comparison of Treatments for an Infected Pilonidal Sinus: Differences in Scar Quality and Outcome Between Secondary Wound Healing and Limberg Flap in a Prospective Study].[感染性藏毛窦治疗方法的比较:前瞻性研究中二期伤口愈合与林贝格皮瓣在瘢痕质量和结局方面的差异]
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2016 Apr;48(2):111-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-111322. Epub 2016 Apr 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Midline and off-midline wound closure methods after surgical treatment for pilonidal sinus.中线和非中线切口关闭方法在经皮内镜治疗骶尾部藏毛窦术后的应用
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 16;1(1):CD015213. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015213.pub2.
2
Five-year recurrence after endoscopic approach to pilonidal sinus disease: A multicentre experience.内镜治疗藏毛窦疾病 5 年后复发:多中心经验。
Tech Coloproctol. 2023 Oct;27(10):929-935. doi: 10.1007/s10151-023-02846-7. Epub 2023 Aug 19.
3
Endoscopic approach to complex or recurrent pilonidal sinus: A retrospective analysis.
内镜治疗复杂或复发性藏毛窦:回顾性分析。
Int Wound J. 2023 Apr;20(4):1212-1218. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13980. Epub 2022 Oct 21.
4
Endoscopic Treatment of Pilonidal Sinus Disease: State of Art and Review of the Literature.藏毛窦疾病的内镜治疗:现状与文献综述
Front Surg. 2022 Jan 4;8:812128. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.812128. eCollection 2021.
5
Authors' reply to: "The long-term recurrence rate of minimally invasive methods in pilonidal sinus disease therapy is still unclear".作者对《藏毛窦疾病治疗中微创方法的长期复发率仍不明确》的回复
Tech Coloproctol. 2022 Feb;26(2):159-160. doi: 10.1007/s10151-021-02559-9. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
6
Endoscopic Pilonidal Sinus Treatment: A Tertiary Care Academic Center Experience.内镜下藏毛窦治疗:一家三级医疗学术中心的经验
Front Surg. 2021 Aug 9;8:723050. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.723050. eCollection 2021.
7
Consensus statement of the Italian society of colorectal surgery (SICCR): management and treatment of pilonidal disease.意大利结直肠外科学会(SICCR)共识声明:藏毛窦疾病的处理和治疗。
Tech Coloproctol. 2021 Dec;25(12):1269-1280. doi: 10.1007/s10151-021-02487-8. Epub 2021 Jun 27.
8
A minimally invasive approach to pilonidal disease with endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment (EPSiT): a single-center case series with long-term results.内镜下治疗藏毛窦(EPSiT)治疗藏毛窦病的微创方法:一项单中心病例系列研究及长期结果。
Tech Coloproctol. 2021 Sep;25(9):1045-1054. doi: 10.1007/s10151-021-02477-w. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
9
Negative pressure-assisted endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment.负压辅助内镜下肛痿治疗。
Tech Coloproctol. 2021 Jun;25(6):739-743. doi: 10.1007/s10151-021-02431-w. Epub 2021 Mar 23.