• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Evaluation of a Family Connects Dissemination to Four High-Poverty Rural Counties.评估一项面向四个贫困农村县的家庭联系传播活动。
Matern Child Health J. 2022 May;26(5):1067-1076. doi: 10.1007/s10995-021-03297-y. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
2
Randomized controlled trial of universal postnatal nurse home visiting: impact on emergency care.随机对照试验的普遍产后护士家访:对急救的影响。
Pediatrics. 2013 Nov;132 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S140-6. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-1021M.
3
Effect of a Universal Postpartum Nurse Home Visiting Program on Child Maltreatment and Emergency Medical Care at 5 Years of Age: A Randomized Clinical Trial.普遍的产后护士家访项目对 5 岁以下儿童虐待和急诊医疗的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jul 1;4(7):e2116024. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.16024.
4
Effect of a Community Agency-Administered Nurse Home Visitation Program on Program Use and Maternal and Infant Health Outcomes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.社区机构管理的护士家访计划对项目使用和母婴健康结局的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Nov 1;2(11):e1914522. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.14522.
5
From concept to application: the impact of a community-wide intervention to improve the delivery of preventive services to children.从概念到应用:一项全社区干预措施对改善儿童预防性服务提供情况的影响。
Pediatrics. 2001 Sep;108(3):E42. doi: 10.1542/peds.108.3.e42.
6
Implementation and randomized controlled trial evaluation of universal postnatal nurse home visiting.普遍的产后护士家访的实施和随机对照试验评估。
Am J Public Health. 2014 Feb;104 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S136-43. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301361. Epub 2013 Dec 19.
7
Randomized controlled trial of Family Connects: Effects on child emergency medical care from birth to 24 months.家庭联系随机对照试验:对出生至 24 个月儿童急诊医疗的影响。
Dev Psychopathol. 2019 Dec;31(5):1863-1872. doi: 10.1017/S0954579419000889.
8
Effect of Preschool Home Visiting on School Readiness and Need for Services in Elementary School: A Randomized Clinical Trial.学前家访对小学生学业准备和服务需求的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Pediatr. 2018 Aug 6;172(8):e181029. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.1029.
9
Randomized Controlled Trial of Doula-Home-Visiting Services: Impact on Maternal and Infant Health.导乐家庭访视服务的随机对照试验:对母婴健康的影响
Matern Child Health J. 2018 Oct;22(Suppl 1):105-113. doi: 10.1007/s10995-018-2537-7.
10
Home Visiting: A Service Strategy to Reduce Poverty and Mitigate Its Consequences.家访:一项减少贫困及其影响的服务策略。
Acad Pediatr. 2016 Apr;16(3 Suppl):S105-11. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2016.01.005.

引用本文的文献

1
Rural maternal health interventions: A scoping review and implications for best practices.农村孕产妇保健干预措施:一项范围综述及对最佳实践的启示
J Rural Health. 2025 Jan;41(1):e70007. doi: 10.1111/jrh.70007.
2
Interventions to promote the health and well-being of children under 5s experiencing homelessness in high-income countries: a scoping review.促进高收入国家 5 岁以下无家可归儿童健康和福祉的干预措施:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jan 11;14(1):e076492. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076492.
3
The Role of a Local Health Department in Advancing Health Equity: Universal Postpartum Home Visiting in a Large Urban Setting.地方卫生部门在促进健康公平方面的作用:大城市环境中的普遍产后家访
Health Equity. 2023 Oct 23;7(1):703-712. doi: 10.1089/heq.2023.0104. eCollection 2023.
4
Impact of a universal perinatal home-visiting program on reduction in race disparities in maternal and child health: Two randomised controlled trials and a field quasi-experiment.一项普遍的围产期家访计划对减少母婴健康方面种族差异的影响:两项随机对照试验和一项现场准实验。
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2022 Aug 23;15:100356. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2022.100356. eCollection 2022 Nov.

本文引用的文献

1
Maximizing the return on investment in Early Childhood Home Visiting through enhanced eligibility screening.通过强化资格筛选,最大限度提高幼儿家庭访问投资回报。
Child Abuse Negl. 2021 Dec;122:105339. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105339. Epub 2021 Sep 21.
2
Effect of a Universal Postpartum Nurse Home Visiting Program on Child Maltreatment and Emergency Medical Care at 5 Years of Age: A Randomized Clinical Trial.普遍的产后护士家访项目对 5 岁以下儿童虐待和急诊医疗的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jul 1;4(7):e2116024. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.16024.
3
Rural-Urban Differences In Severe Maternal Morbidity And Mortality In The US, 2007-15.美国 2007-2015 年严重孕产妇发病率和死亡率的城乡差异。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Dec;38(12):2077-2085. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00805.
4
Effect of a Community Agency-Administered Nurse Home Visitation Program on Program Use and Maternal and Infant Health Outcomes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.社区机构管理的护士家访计划对项目使用和母婴健康结局的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Nov 1;2(11):e1914522. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.14522.
5
Declining Numbers of Rural US Hospitals.美国农村医院数量不断减少。
JAMA. 2018 Nov 27;320(20):2067. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.18506.
6
Health-Related Behaviors by Urban-Rural County Classification - United States, 2013.按城乡县分类划分的与健康相关行为 - 美国,2013年
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2017 Feb 3;66(5):1-8. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6605a1.
7
Current State of Child Health in Rural America: How Context Shapes Children's Health.美国农村儿童健康现状:背景如何影响儿童健康。
J Rural Health. 2018 Feb;34 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):s3-s12. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12222. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
8
An Integrative Review of Postpartum Depression in Rural U.S. Communities.美国农村社区产后抑郁症的综合综述。
Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2016 Jun;30(3):418-24. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2015.12.003. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
9
The Double Disparity Facing Rural Local Health Departments.农村基层卫生部门面临的双重差距。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2016;37:167-84. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031914-122755. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
10
Implementation and randomized controlled trial evaluation of universal postnatal nurse home visiting.普遍的产后护士家访的实施和随机对照试验评估。
Am J Public Health. 2014 Feb;104 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S136-43. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301361. Epub 2013 Dec 19.

评估一项面向四个贫困农村县的家庭联系传播活动。

Evaluation of a Family Connects Dissemination to Four High-Poverty Rural Counties.

机构信息

Center for Child and Family Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

Sanford School of Public Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

出版信息

Matern Child Health J. 2022 May;26(5):1067-1076. doi: 10.1007/s10995-021-03297-y. Epub 2022 Jan 7.

DOI:10.1007/s10995-021-03297-y
PMID:34993754
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9623422/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Home visiting is a popular approach to improving the health and well-being of families with infants and young children in the United States; but, to date, no home visiting program has achieved population impact for families in rural communities. The current report includes evaluation results from the dissemination of a brief, universal postpartum home visiting program to four high-poverty rural counties.

METHODS

The study utilized a quasi-experimental design. From Sept. 1, 2014-Dec. 31, 2015, families of all 994 resident births in four rural eastern North Carolina counties were assigned to receive Family Connects (FC; intervention group). A representative subsample of families participated in impact evaluation when the infants were 6 months old: 392 intervention group families and 126 families with infants born between Feb. 1, 2014-July 31, 2014 (natural comparison group). Data were analyzed preliminarily for reporting to funders in 2016 and, more comprehensively, using propensity score matching in 2020.

RESULTS

Of FC-eligible families, 78% initiated participation; 83% of participating families completed the program (net completion = 65%). At age 6 months, intervention parents reported more community connections, more frequent use of community services, greater social support, and greater success with infants sleeping on their backs. Intervention infants had fewer total emergency department and urgent care visits. Intervention parents had more total emergency department and urgent care visits and (marginally) fewer overnights in the hospital.

CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE

FC can be implemented successfully in high-poverty rural communities with broad reach and positive benefits for infants and families.

摘要

目的

家访是改善美国家庭中婴儿和幼儿健康和福祉的一种流行方法;但是,迄今为止,没有任何家访计划对农村社区的家庭产生了广泛影响。本报告包括向四个高贫困农村县推广简短、普遍的产后家访计划的评估结果。

方法

该研究采用了准实验设计。从 2014 年 9 月 1 日至 2015 年 12 月 31 日,四个北卡罗来纳州东部农村县的所有 994 名常住出生家庭都被分配接受家庭联系(FC;干预组)。当婴儿 6 个月大时,对一个有代表性的干预组家庭样本进行了影响评估:392 个干预组家庭和 126 个 2014 年 2 月 1 日至 7 月 31 日出生的婴儿的自然对照组家庭。数据于 2016 年初步分析,以便向资助者报告,并于 2020 年使用倾向评分匹配进行更全面分析。

结果

在符合 FC 条件的家庭中,有 78%的家庭开始参与;83%的参与家庭完成了该计划(净完成率为 65%)。在 6 个月大时,干预组父母报告了更多的社区联系、更频繁地使用社区服务、更多的社会支持以及婴儿仰卧睡觉的成功率更高。干预组婴儿的总急诊和紧急护理就诊次数较少。干预组父母的总急诊和紧急护理就诊次数更多(略有),住院过夜次数更少。

实践结论

FC 可以在高贫困农村社区成功实施,覆盖面广,对婴儿和家庭有积极影响。