Adult Neurodevelopment and Geriatric Psychiatry Division, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Canada.
Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2024 Jul-Aug;31(4):360-369. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2021.2023154. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
The common requirement to set the time to "10 past 11" on the Clock Drawing Test is intended to elicit a stimulus bound response (SBR), in which the responder is "pulled" to the salient stimulus "10," resulting in hands set at "10 before 11." SBRs are considered markers of executive dysfunction, although this assumption has not yet been validated. We compared SBR and other time-setting errors on inhibitory control tests, hypothesizing that they represent related constructs. The role of semantic dysfunction in the formation of those errors was also investigated. We examined baseline test performance of participants with Mild Cognitive Impairment or a history of depression, and control participants, enrolled in a dementia prevention study. Among 258 participants, we identified clocks with SBRs ( = 16), other time errors ( = 22), or no errors at all ( = 42). Performance between the groups with SBRs and other time-setting errors did not differ on any of the executive tests, and both error groups performed significantly worse than the No Error group on the semantic tests. Control for covariates further supported semantic and executive components in time-setting errors. Both semantic and inhibitory control deficits may underlie time representation errors in general.
在画钟测验中设置时间为“11 点 10 分”的常见要求是为了引出一种刺激约束反应(SBR),其中应答者被“拉”到明显的刺激“10”,导致指针指向“11 点前 10 分”。SBR 被认为是执行功能障碍的标志物,尽管这一假设尚未得到验证。我们比较了抑制控制测试中的 SBR 和其他时间设定错误,假设它们代表相关的结构。还研究了语义功能障碍在这些错误形成中的作用。我们检查了轻度认知障碍或抑郁症病史的参与者以及对照组参与者在痴呆预防研究中的基线测试表现。在 258 名参与者中,我们确定了具有 SBR(n=16)、其他时间错误(n=22)或没有错误(n=42)的时钟。在任何执行测试中,具有 SBR 和其他时间设定错误的组之间的表现均无差异,而这两个错误组在语义测试中的表现均明显差于无错误组。对协变量的控制进一步支持了时间设定错误中的语义和执行成分。语义和抑制控制缺陷可能是导致一般时间表示错误的基础。