• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国国立卫生研究院共识发展项目对医生临床实践的影响。

Effects of the National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Program on physician practice.

作者信息

Kosecoff J, Kanouse D E, Rogers W H, McCloskey L, Winslow C M, Brook R H

机构信息

Department of Medicine, UCLA School of Medicine, Santa Monica.

出版信息

JAMA. 1987 Nov 20;258(19):2708-13.

PMID:3499522
Abstract

The effects of the National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Program on physician behavior were investigated. The medical records of 2770 patients treated in ten hospitals throughout the state of Washington were reviewed to determine if quality of care improved with respect to 12 recommendations put forth by four consensus panels concerning surgical management of primary breast cancer, the use of steroid receptors in breast cancer, cesarean childbirth, and coronary artery bypass surgery. Care was studied during 24 months before and 13 to 24 months after each consensus conference. Results showed that the conferences mostly failed to stimulate change in physician practice, despite moderate success in reaching the appropriate target audience. It was concluded that the consensus development conference is an important educational tool whose effects might be enhanced by focusing on areas of practice that need improvement and by encouraging follow-up programs at the state and local level.

摘要

研究了美国国立卫生研究院共识发展项目对医生行为的影响。回顾了华盛顿州十家医院2770名患者的病历,以确定针对四个共识小组提出的关于原发性乳腺癌手术管理、乳腺癌中类固醇受体的使用、剖宫产和冠状动脉搭桥手术的12项建议,医疗质量是否有所改善。在每次共识会议前24个月以及会议后13至24个月期间对医疗情况进行了研究。结果表明,尽管在接触到合适的目标受众方面取得了一定成功,但这些会议大多未能促使医生的医疗行为发生改变。得出的结论是,共识发展会议是一种重要的教育工具,通过关注需要改进的医疗实践领域并鼓励州和地方层面的后续项目,其效果可能会得到增强。

相似文献

1
Effects of the National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Program on physician practice.美国国立卫生研究院共识发展项目对医生临床实践的影响。
JAMA. 1987 Nov 20;258(19):2708-13.
2
Changing practice patterns in the management of primary breast cancer: Consensus Development Program.原发性乳腺癌管理中不断变化的实践模式:共识发展项目
Health Serv Res. 1990 Dec;25(5):809-23.
3
Breast conservation therapy in the United States following the 1990 National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference on the treatment of patients with early stage invasive breast carcinoma.1990年美国国立卫生研究院关于早期浸润性乳腺癌患者治疗的共识发展会议之后美国的保乳治疗。
Cancer. 1999 Aug 15;86(4):628-37.
4
Trends and patterns of vaginal birth after cesarean availability in the United States.美国剖宫产术后阴道分娩的趋势和模式。
Semin Perinatol. 2010 Aug;34(4):237-43. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2010.03.002.
5
NIH consensus development statement on cesarean childbirth.
Md State Med J. 1982 Feb;31(2):46-54.
6
Indications for cesarean section: final statement of the panel of the National Consensus Conference on Aspects of Cesarean Birth.剖宫产指征:剖宫产分娩相关问题全国共识会议专家组最终声明
CMAJ. 1986 Jun 15;134(12):1348-52.
7
National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement. Coronary artery bypass surgery: scientific and clinical aspects.美国国立卫生研究院共识发展会议声明。冠状动脉搭桥手术:科学与临床方面。
J Fla Med Assoc. 1981 Oct;68(10):827-32.
8
NIH Consensus Development Conference summary. Coronary artery bypass surgery: scientific and clinical aspects.美国国立卫生研究院共识发展会议总结。冠状动脉搭桥手术:科学与临床方面。
J Tenn Med Assoc. 1982 May;75(5):335-8.
9
Cesarean section rates in the United States. The short-term failure of the National Consensus Development Conference in 1980.美国的剖宫产率。1980年全国共识发展会议的短期失败。
JAMA. 1984 Dec 21;252(23):3273-6.
10
Consensus development conference on coronary artery bypass surgery: medical and scientific aspects. National institutes of health, December 3-5, 1980 Bethesda, Maryland.
Circulation. 1982 Jun;65(7 Pt 2):1-129.

引用本文的文献

1
Variation in Surgical Technique for Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction in Skeletally Immature Patients: Data From the JUPITER Prospective Multicenter Study Group.骨骼未成熟患者髌股内侧韧带重建手术技术的差异:来自朱庇特前瞻性多中心研究组的数据。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2025 Feb 6;13(2):23259671241300516. doi: 10.1177/23259671241300516. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Lumbar puncture for neurosyphilis investigation in asymptomatic patients with HIV-syphilis coinfection: a cross-sectional study among infectious disease specialists.对 HIV-梅毒合并感染无症状患者进行神经梅毒调查的腰椎穿刺:传染病专家的横断面研究。
Sao Paulo Med J. 2023 Jan-Feb;141(1):20-29. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2021.0744.R1.03032022.
3
Adjunct clinical interventions that influence vaginal birth after cesarean rates: systematic review.
辅助临床干预措施对剖宫产术后阴道分娩率的影响:系统评价。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Nov 21;18(1):452. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-2065-x.
4
Emergency Department Management of Bronchiolitis in the United States.美国细支气管炎的急诊科管理
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2019 May;35(5):323-329. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001145.
5
Impact of recent guideline changes on aspirin prescribing after knee arthroplasty.近期指南变更对膝关节置换术后阿司匹林处方的影响。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2016 Oct 20;11(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s13018-016-0456-0.
6
Decreasing the critical value of hemoglobin required for physician notification reduces the rate of blood transfusions.降低医生接到通知所需的血红蛋白临界值可降低输血率。
Int J Gen Med. 2016 Jun 3;9:133-6. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S96248. eCollection 2016.
7
Simplistic and complex thought in medicine: the rationale for a person-centered care model as a medical revolution.医学中的简单与复杂思维:以患者为中心的护理模式作为一场医学革命的基本原理。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016 Apr 5;10:449-57. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S103007. eCollection 2016.
8
SEaRCH™ expert panel process: streamlining the link between evidence and practice.SEaRCH™专家小组流程:简化证据与实践之间的联系。
BMC Res Notes. 2016 Jan 7;9:16. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1802-8.
9
Role of Leadership in Narrowing the Gap between Science and Practice: Improving Treatment Outcomes at the Systems Level.领导力在缩小科学与实践差距中的作用:在系统层面改善治疗效果
Psychiatr Q. 2015 Sep;86(3):311-23. doi: 10.1007/s11126-015-9372-4.
10
Containing U.S. health care costs: What bullet to bite?控制美国医疗保健成本:该咬哪颗子弹?
Health Care Financ Rev. 1992 Mar;1991(Suppl):1-12.