• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

循证医学检索要点:卫生保健专业人员入门。

Key concepts for searching evidence: an introduction for healthcare professionals.

机构信息

Departamento de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Nacional de La Matanza, Buenos Aires, Argentina. ORCID: 0000-0002-7983-4870.

Centro Cochrane Asociado, Departamento de Investigación, Instituto Universitario Hospital Italiano, Buenos Aires, Argentina. Email:

出版信息

Medwave. 2022 Jan 7;22(1):e8512. doi: 10.5867/medwave.2022.01.002512.

DOI:10.5867/medwave.2022.01.002512
PMID:34995274
Abstract

The currently abundant bibliography on healthcare can make the search process an exhausting and frustrating experience. For this reason, it is essential to learn the basic concepts of research question formulation, information sources, and search strategies to make this process more efficient and user-friendly. The search strategy is an iterative process that allows the incorporation of tools and terms in the strategy design to optimize evidence retrieval. Each strategy varies according to the questions, the language used, the source of information accessed, and the available tools. This article is part of a methodological series of narrative reviews on biostatistics and clinical epidemiology. This narrative review describes the essential elements for developing a literature search strategy and identifying the relevant evidence concerning a clinical question through familiar and accessible sources (such as Google and Google Scholar), as well as search interfaces and technical-scientific databases focused on biomedical knowledge (PubMed and The Cochrane Library).

摘要

目前关于医疗保健的文献资料非常丰富,这使得搜索过程变得既疲惫又令人沮丧。出于这个原因,学习研究问题制定、信息来源和搜索策略的基本概念对于使这个过程更加高效和用户友好是至关重要的。搜索策略是一个迭代的过程,它允许在策略设计中纳入工具和术语,以优化证据检索。每个策略都根据问题、使用的语言、访问的信息来源和可用的工具而有所不同。本文是关于生物统计学和临床流行病学的叙述性综述方法系列的一部分。这篇叙述性综述描述了制定文献搜索策略的基本要素,并通过熟悉和易于访问的来源(如 Google 和 Google Scholar)以及专门针对生物医学知识的搜索界面和技术科学数据库(PubMed 和 The Cochrane Library)确定与临床问题相关的证据。

相似文献

1
Key concepts for searching evidence: an introduction for healthcare professionals.循证医学检索要点:卫生保健专业人员入门。
Medwave. 2022 Jan 7;22(1):e8512. doi: 10.5867/medwave.2022.01.002512.
2
Information sources for obesity prevention policy research: a review of systematic reviews.肥胖预防政策研究的信息来源:系统评价综述。
Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 8;6(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0543-2.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
A comparison of the performance of seven key bibliographic databases in identifying all relevant systematic reviews of interventions for hypertension.七个关键文献数据库在识别所有关于高血压干预措施的相关系统评价方面的性能比较。
Syst Rev. 2016 Feb 9;5:27. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0197-5.
5
A comparative evaluation of PDQ-Evidence.PDQ-Evidence 的对比评估。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Mar 15;16(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0299-8.
6
An Overview of How to Search and Write a Medical Literature Review.如何检索和撰写医学文献综述概述。
Respir Care. 2023 Nov;68(11):1576-1584. doi: 10.4187/respcare.11198. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
7
Developing search strategies for clinical practice guidelines in SUMSearch and Google Scholar and assessing their retrieval performance.在SUMSearch和谷歌学术中为临床实践指南制定检索策略并评估其检索性能。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007 Jun 30;7:28. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-7-28.
8
Assessing the performance of methodological search filters to improve the efficiency of evidence information retrieval: five literature reviews and a qualitative study.评估方法学检索过滤器的性能以提高证据信息检索的效率:五项文献综述和一项定性研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2017 Nov;21(69):1-148. doi: 10.3310/hta21690.
9
Retrieving clinical evidence: a comparison of PubMed and Google Scholar for quick clinical searches.检索临床证据:PubMed与谷歌学术用于快速临床检索的比较
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Aug 15;15(8):e164. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2624.
10
Specialist Bibliographic Databases.专业书目数据库。
J Korean Med Sci. 2016 May;31(5):660-73. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.5.660. Epub 2016 Feb 23.

引用本文的文献

1
PICOT questions and search strategies formulation: A novel approach using artificial intelligence automation.PICOT问题与检索策略制定:一种使用人工智能自动化的新方法。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2025 Jan;57(1):5-16. doi: 10.1111/jnu.13036. Epub 2024 Nov 24.
2
Efficacy and safety of intraperitoneal dexamethasone on postoperative nausea and vomiting following laparoscopy: study protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔内地塞米松对腹腔镜术后恶心呕吐的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Nov 23;13(11):e070371. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070371.