• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

蚂蚁在持久的少数派存在下,通过多数让步来达成民主共识。

Ants resort to majority concession to reach democratic consensus in the presence of a persistent minority.

机构信息

Department of Physics of Complex Systems, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 7610001, Israel.

Department of Chemical and Biological Physics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 7610001, Israel.

出版信息

Curr Biol. 2022 Feb 7;32(3):645-653.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.12.013. Epub 2022 Jan 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.cub.2021.12.013
PMID:34995489
Abstract

Social groups often need to overcome differences in individual interests and knowledge to reach consensus decisions. Here, we combine experiments and modeling to study conflict resolution in emigrating ant colonies during binary nest selection. We find that cohesive emigration, without fragmentation, is achieved only by intermediate-sized colonies. We then impose a conflict regarding the desired emigration target between colony subgroups. This is achieved using an automated selective gate system that manipulates the information accessible to each ant. Under this conflict, we find that individuals concede their potential benefit to promote social consensus. In particular, colonies resolve the conflict imposed by a persistent minority through "majority concession," wherein a majority of ants that hold first-hand knowledge regarding the superior quality nest choose to reside in the inferior one. This outcome is unlikely in social groups of selfish individuals and emphasizes the importance of group cohesion in eusocial societies. VIDEO ABSTRACT.

摘要

社会群体通常需要克服个体利益和知识的差异,以达成共识决策。在这里,我们结合实验和建模来研究二元巢穴选择中迁徙蚁群中的冲突解决。我们发现,只有中等大小的蚁群才能实现没有分裂的凝聚力迁徙。然后,我们在蚁群亚群之间引入了关于期望迁徙目标的冲突。这是通过使用自动选择门系统来实现的,该系统可以操纵每个蚂蚁可获取的信息。在这种冲突下,我们发现个体为了促进社会共识而放弃了自己的潜在利益。具体来说,殖民地通过“多数让步”来解决由少数派持续存在所带来的冲突,即在拥有关于优质巢穴的第一手知识的大多数蚂蚁中,选择居住在较差的巢穴中的蚂蚁。这种结果在自私个体的社会群体中不太可能出现,这强调了群体凝聚力在真社会性社会中的重要性。

相似文献

1
Ants resort to majority concession to reach democratic consensus in the presence of a persistent minority.蚂蚁在持久的少数派存在下,通过多数让步来达成民主共识。
Curr Biol. 2022 Feb 7;32(3):645-653.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.12.013. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
2
Improving decision speed, accuracy and group cohesion through early information gathering in house-hunting ants.通过在寻屋蚂蚁中尽早收集信息来提高决策速度、准确性和群体凝聚力。
PLoS One. 2010 Sep 29;5(9):e13059. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013059.
3
An Upper and Lower Bound for the Convergence Time of House-Hunting in Ant Colonies.蚂蚁找巢时间收敛的上下界。
J Comput Biol. 2022 Apr;29(4):344-357. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2021.0364. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
4
Information flow, opinion polling and collective intelligence in house-hunting social insects.在寻找住所的群居昆虫中的信息流、民意调查与集体智慧。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2002 Nov 29;357(1427):1567-83. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1066.
5
The influence of the few: a stable 'oligarchy' controls information flow in house-hunting ants.少数派的影响:稳定的“寡头统治”控制着寻家蚂蚁的信息流。
Proc Biol Sci. 2018 Feb 14;285(1872). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.2726.
6
How collective comparisons emerge without individual comparisons of the options.在没有对选项进行个体比较的情况下,集体比较是如何出现的。
Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Jul 22;281(1787). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.0737. Epub 2014 Jun 11.
7
Colony size and initial conditions combine to shape colony reunification dynamics.菌落大小和初始条件共同塑造菌落重新团聚的动态过程。
Behav Processes. 2020 Jan;170:103994. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2019.103994. Epub 2019 Nov 2.
8
The Power of Population Effect in Ant House-Hunting: A Computational Modeling Approach.群体效应在蚂蚁找巢中的作用:一种计算建模方法。
J Comput Biol. 2022 Apr;29(4):382-408. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2021.0369. Epub 2022 Jan 20.
9
Conditional use of social and private information guides house-hunting ants.条件性使用社会和私人信息引导寻巢蚂蚁。
PLoS One. 2013 May 31;8(5):e64668. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064668. Print 2013.
10
Speed versus accuracy in collective decision making.集体决策中的速度与准确性
Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Dec 7;270(1532):2457-63. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2527.

引用本文的文献

1
Robotic communication with ants.与蚂蚁的机器人通信。
J Exp Biol. 2022 Aug 1;225(15). doi: 10.1242/jeb.244106. Epub 2022 Aug 9.