GSK, Avenue Fleming 20, B-1300 Wavre, Belgium.
GSK, Avenue Fleming 20, B-1300 Wavre, Belgium.
Vaccine. 2022 Feb 7;40(6):924-933. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.12.045. Epub 2022 Jan 5.
The European Clinical Trial Regulation No 536/2014 is the first mandate for a non-technical, publicly disclosed, plain language summary (PLS) of clinical trial results. This easy-to-understand summary has the potential to inform the public about clinical trial results and thereby improve health literacy in vaccines. To investigate the utility of the PLS, we undertook 2 online surveys (July/October 2020) in the United Kingdom, the United States and India. Participants were selected by quota sampling to ensure representation of gender, age and parental status. Those lacking interest in vaccine clinical research were excluded. In survey 1, participants were questioned about their interest in and expectations of vaccine trial results. In survey 2, the perceptions of participants to a range of written communication styles used in publicly available PLSs were evaluated. A total of 66 (13%) and 122 (29%) individuals were excluded solely due to lack of interest in vaccine clinical research in surveys 1 and 2, respectively; 450 respondents (150/country) completed survey 1 and 300 (100/country) completed survey 2. In survey 1, there was a correlation (p < 0.01) between claimed knowledge of and trust in vaccines. Healthcare professionals were the most trusted source for vaccine information, while vaccine companies were ranked relatively low. In survey 2, infographic PLS formats were considered easiest to understand, most engaging and the strongest communicators. Emphasizing the main points of the infographics in the text did not improve comprehension or recall. Most respondents (86%) indicated that they would like to see this type of communication in the future. Overall, this research suggests that the PLS, by optimizing content and format, has a potential to increase health literacy, and thereby, as part of a wider integrated communication strategy, build vaccine knowledge and confidence.
《欧洲临床试验法规 2014 年第 536 号》是首次要求以非技术、公开披露、通俗易懂的语言总结(PLS)临床试验结果。这种易于理解的摘要有可能让公众了解临床试验结果,从而提高疫苗的健康素养。为了研究 PLS 的实用性,我们在英国、美国和印度进行了 2 项在线调查(2020 年 7 月至 10 月)。参与者通过配额抽样选择,以确保在性别、年龄和父母身份方面具有代表性。那些对疫苗临床研究不感兴趣的人被排除在外。在调查 1 中,参与者被问及他们对疫苗试验结果的兴趣和期望。在调查 2 中,评估了参与者对一系列公开 PLS 中使用的书面沟通方式的看法。由于对疫苗临床研究缺乏兴趣,仅在调查 1 和 2 中分别有 66 人(13%)和 122 人(29%)被排除在外;450 名受访者(每个国家/地区 150 名)完成了调查 1,300 名(每个国家/地区 100 名)完成了调查 2。在调查 1 中,声称对疫苗的了解程度和信任程度之间存在相关性(p<0.01)。医疗保健专业人员是疫苗信息最值得信赖的来源,而疫苗公司的排名相对较低。在调查 2 中,信息图 PLS 格式被认为最容易理解、最吸引人,也是最强的传播者。在文本中强调信息图的要点并没有提高理解或记忆。大多数受访者(86%)表示希望在未来看到这种类型的沟通。总的来说,这项研究表明,PLS 通过优化内容和格式,有可能提高健康素养,从而作为更广泛的综合沟通策略的一部分,建立疫苗知识和信心。