Suppr超能文献

下壁伴右心室心肌梗死患者的长期预后。

Long-term outcomes in inferior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with right ventricular myocardial infarction.

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100037, China.

The First People's Hospital of Tianmen, Tianmen 431700, China.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol. 2022 Mar 15;351:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.01.003. Epub 2022 Jan 5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the prognostic influence of the presence of right ventricular myocardial infarction (RVMI) on patients with inferior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in the contemporary reperfusion era.

METHODS

9308 patients with inferior STEMI were included from the prospective, nationwide, multicenter China Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry, including 1745 (18.75%) patients with RVMI and 7563 (81.25%) patients without RVMI. The primary outcome was two-year all-cause mortality. The secondary outcome was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event (MACCE) defined as a composite of all-cause mortality, recurrent MI, revascularization, stroke, and major bleeding.

RESULTS

After two-year follow up, there were no significant differences between inferior STEMI patients with or without RVMI in all-cause mortality (12.0% vs 11.3%; adjusted HR: 1.05; 95% CI: 0.90 to 1.24; P = 0.5103). Inferior STEMI with RVMI was associated with higher risk of MACCE (25.6% vs 22.0%; adjusted HR: 1.17; 95% CI: 1.05 to 1.31; P = 0.0038), revascularization (10.3% vs 8.1%; adjusted HR: 1.23; 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.48; P = 0.0218), and major bleeding (4.6% vs 2.7%; adjusted HR: 1.56; 95% CI: 1.18 to 2.07; P = 0.0019). Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and thrombolysis were independent predictors to decrease all-cause mortality. For patients who received timely reperfusion, RVMI involvement did not increase all-cause mortality, whereas for those who did not undergo reperfusion, RVMI increased all-cause mortality (20.3% vs 15.7%; HR: 1.34; 95% CI: 1.10 to 1.63).

CONCLUSION

RVMI did not increase all-cause mortality for inferior STEMI patients in contemporary reperfusion era, whereas the risk was increased for patients with no reperfusion treatment.

摘要

目的

评估右心室心肌梗死(RVMI)对当代再灌注时代下下壁 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者预后的影响。

方法

9308 例下壁 STEMI 患者纳入前瞻性、全国性、多中心的中国急性心肌梗死注册研究,其中 1745 例(18.75%)患者合并 RVMI,7563 例(81.25%)患者未合并 RVMI。主要结局为 2 年全因死亡率。次要结局为主要不良心脑血管事件(MACCE),定义为全因死亡率、再发心肌梗死、血运重建、卒中和大出血的复合终点。

结果

2 年随访后,下壁 STEMI 患者无论是否合并 RVMI,全因死亡率均无显著差异(12.0% vs. 11.3%;调整 HR:1.05;95%CI:0.90 至 1.24;P=0.5103)。合并 RVMI 的下壁 STEMI 患者 MACCE 风险更高(25.6% vs. 22.0%;调整 HR:1.17;95%CI:1.05 至 1.31;P=0.0038)、血运重建(10.3% vs. 8.1%;调整 HR:1.23;95%CI:1.03 至 1.48;P=0.0218)和大出血(4.6% vs. 2.7%;调整 HR:1.56;95%CI:1.18 至 2.07;P=0.0019)的风险更高。直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)和溶栓是降低全因死亡率的独立预测因素。对于接受及时再灌注的患者,RVMI 并不增加全因死亡率,而对于未接受再灌注治疗的患者,RVMI 会增加全因死亡率(20.3% vs. 15.7%;HR:1.34;95%CI:1.10 至 1.63)。

结论

在当代再灌注时代,RVMI 并未增加下壁 STEMI 患者的全因死亡率,而对于未接受再灌注治疗的患者,其风险增加。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验