Section of Forensic Medical Sciences, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Italy.
Legal Medicine Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2021 Dec 30;39(3):49-57.
The dental radiographic comparison is one of the most reliable and scientifically accepted methods for body identification (ID). The heterogeneity between AM (ante mortem) and PM (postmortem) x-rays images continues to stand as an issue for the forensic odontologist. Casual dental findings on X-rays for investigation of other structures than teeth or maxillaries, could eventually be a relevant source of dental data for the ID especially when AM dental files or X-rays are lacking. Two cases are reported in which the body ID was achieved through the comparison of PM dental X-rays with dental images obtained by radiographies of other structures (e.g. X-rays of the skull or cervical spine). These cases highlight that these occasional dental findings might provide sufficient evidence for a body identification. In the collection of AM data of missing people, the collection of all available records and radiographies of the head, neck and chest should be carefully reviewed by forensic odontologists, seeking for any available dental data.
牙射线照相比较是最可靠和被科学接受的身体识别(ID)方法之一。生前(AM)和死后(PM)X 射线图像之间的异质性仍然是法医牙医学家的一个问题。偶然在 X 射线检查牙齿以外的其他结构时发现的牙科情况,最终可能成为 ID 的相关牙科数据来源,特别是在缺乏 AM 牙科档案或 X 射线的情况下。报告了两例通过比较 PM 牙科 X 射线与通过其他结构的射线照相获得的牙科图像(例如颅骨或颈椎 X 射线)进行身体 ID 的案例。这些案例强调,这些偶然的牙科发现可能提供足够的证据进行身体识别。在失踪人员的 AM 数据收集过程中,法医牙医学家应仔细审查所有可用的头部、颈部和胸部记录和射线照相,以寻找任何可用的牙科数据。