Katsuno Hidetoshi, Hanai Tsunekazu, Endo Tomoyoshi, Morise Zenichi, Uyama Ichiro
Department of Surgery, Okazaki Medical Center, Fujita Health University, Gotanda 1, Harisaki, Okazaki, Aichi, 444-0827, Japan.
Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan.
Surg Today. 2022 Jun;52(6):978-985. doi: 10.1007/s00595-021-02418-y. Epub 2022 Jan 9.
Although meta-analyses and systematic reviews have clarified the benefits of robotic surgery, few studies have focused on robotic rectal surgery (RRS) and the use of Endowrist® instruments. Therefore, we evaluated RRS using the double bipolar method (DBM) and compared its short-term outcomes with those of RRS using the single bipolar method (SBM). This study enrolled 157 consecutive patients and all procedures were performed by the same surgeon and recorded through short video clips. We analyzed the patient demographics and short-term clinical outcomes. Although this observational study has several limitations, the console time for total mesorectal excision using the DBM was significantly shorter than that using the SBM. Although the DBM did not demonstrate a specific learning curve, it was a safe and feasible procedure even for patients with advanced disease. Further studies are needed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the DBM.
尽管荟萃分析和系统评价已经阐明了机器人手术的益处,但很少有研究关注机器人直肠手术(RRS)以及Endowrist®器械的使用。因此,我们采用双极法(DBM)评估了机器人直肠手术,并将其短期结果与采用单极法(SBM)的机器人直肠手术结果进行了比较。本研究连续纳入了157例患者,所有手术均由同一位外科医生进行,并通过短视频片段进行记录。我们分析了患者的人口统计学特征和短期临床结果。尽管这项观察性研究存在一些局限性,但使用双极法进行全直肠系膜切除的控制台时间明显短于使用单极法。尽管双极法没有显示出特定的学习曲线,但即使对于晚期疾病患者,它也是一种安全可行的手术方法。需要进一步研究来评估双极法的成本效益。