Department of Collective Behavior, Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, Konstanz, Germany.
Centre for the Advanced Study of Collective Behaviour, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022 Feb 28;377(1845):20200432. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0432. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
A century ago, foundational work by Thorleif Schjelderup-Ebbe described a 'pecking order' in chicken societies, where individuals could be ordered according to their ability to exert their influence over their group-mates. Now known as dominance hierarchies, these structures have been shown to influence a plethora of individual characteristics and outcomes, situating dominance research as a pillar of the study of modern social ecology and evolution. Here, we first review some of the major questions that have been answered about dominance hierarchies in the last 100 years. Next, we introduce the contributions to this theme issue and summarize how they provide ongoing insight in the epistemology, physiology and neurobiology, hierarchical structure, and dynamics of dominance. These contributions employ the full range of research approaches available to modern biologists. Cross-cutting themes emerging from these contributions include a focus on cognitive underpinnings of dominance, the application of network-analytical approaches, and the utility of experimental rank manipulations for revealing causal relationships. Reflection on the last 100 years of dominance research reveals how Schjelderup-Ebbe's early ideas and the subsequent research helped drive a shift from an essentialist view of species characteristics to the modern recognition of rich inter-individual variation in social, behavioural and physiological phenotypes. This article is part of the theme issue 'The centennial of the pecking order: current state and future prospects for the study of dominance hierarchies'.
一个世纪前,Thorleif Schjelderup-Ebbe 的开创性工作描述了鸡群中的“啄序”,即个体可以根据其对群体同伴施加影响的能力进行排序。现在被称为统治等级,这些结构已被证明会影响众多个体特征和结果,使统治研究成为现代社会生态学和进化研究的支柱。在这里,我们首先回顾了过去 100 年来关于统治等级的一些主要问题。接下来,我们介绍了本期主题的贡献,并总结了它们如何在统治的认识论、生理学和神经生物学、等级结构和动态方面提供持续的见解。这些贡献采用了现代生物学家可用的各种研究方法。这些贡献中出现的交叉主题包括关注统治的认知基础、网络分析方法的应用,以及实验等级操纵在揭示因果关系方面的效用。对统治研究的过去 100 年的反思揭示了 Schjelderup-Ebbe 的早期思想和随后的研究如何帮助从物种特征的本质主义观点转变为现代对社会、行为和生理表现型中丰富的个体间变异性的认识。本文是“啄序百年:统治等级研究的现状和未来展望”主题特刊的一部分。