• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从消费者角度看 COVID-19 自我检测的获益、风险和成本效益。

Benefits, risks, and cost-effectiveness of COVID-19 self-tests from a consumer's perspective.

机构信息

Frankfurt School of Finance & Management, Adickesallee 32-34, 60322, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jan 10;22(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07277-4.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-021-07277-4
PMID:35000587
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8743237/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to quantify the health benefits, risks, and cost-effectiveness of COVID-19 self-tests from a consumer's perspective in Germany.

METHODS

The analysis is based on a modelling approach using secondary data. The clinical endpoints considered in this analysis are avoided SARS-CoV-2 infections and secondary severe clinical events (death, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and long COVID syndrome). The study determines the number of self-tests that need to be conducted under a 7-day incidence of 75 per 100,000 population to prevent one infection or severe clinical event. Furthermore, the study calculates the cost of testing per avoided clinical event and quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained from a consumer perspective.

RESULTS

Disregarding the rate of unreported COVID-19 cases, 4556 self-tests need to be conducted (over 12 years) in order to avoid one undesirable event (death, intensive care unit stay, or long COVID syndrome). Ninety percent of infections are not avoided among direct contacts but along the chain of infection. The costs per quality-adjusted life year gained from a consumer's perspective are €5870. This ratio is particularly sensitive to the 7-day incidence, effective reproduction number, and the age of contacts.

CONCLUSIONS

The benefits of self-testing in the general population at a 7-day incidence rate of 75 per 100,000 appear to be minor. Nevertheless, cost-effectiveness may still be acceptable in the presence of higher-risk contacts given the low costs of self-test kits in Germany.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在从消费者的角度量化德国 COVID-19 自测试的健康效益、风险和成本效益。

方法

该分析基于使用二级数据的建模方法。本分析中考虑的临床终点是避免 SARS-CoV-2 感染和二次严重临床事件(死亡、重症监护病房(ICU)入院和长新冠综合征)。该研究确定了在 75 例/10 万人口的 7 天发病率下需要进行多少次自我检测,以预防一次感染或严重临床事件。此外,该研究还从消费者的角度计算了每避免一次临床事件和每获得一个质量调整生命年(QALY)的检测成本。

结果

不考虑未报告的 COVID-19 病例的比率,需要进行 4556 次自我检测(超过 12 年),以避免一次不良事件(死亡、入住重症监护病房或长新冠综合征)。90%的感染不会在直接接触者中避免,但会在感染链中避免。从消费者的角度来看,每获得一个质量调整生命年的成本为 5870 欧元。这个比率对 7 天发病率、有效繁殖数和接触者的年龄特别敏感。

结论

在 75 例/10 万人口的 7 天发病率下,普通人群进行自我检测的收益似乎很小。然而,鉴于德国自我检测试剂盒的成本较低,在存在高风险接触者的情况下,其成本效益仍可能是可以接受的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0991/8744242/43064f4d3298/12913_2021_7277_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0991/8744242/f18bde5a84bd/12913_2021_7277_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0991/8744242/ac1a02ceb347/12913_2021_7277_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0991/8744242/43064f4d3298/12913_2021_7277_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0991/8744242/f18bde5a84bd/12913_2021_7277_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0991/8744242/ac1a02ceb347/12913_2021_7277_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0991/8744242/43064f4d3298/12913_2021_7277_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Benefits, risks, and cost-effectiveness of COVID-19 self-tests from a consumer's perspective.从消费者角度看 COVID-19 自我检测的获益、风险和成本效益。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jan 10;22(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07277-4.
2
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of four different strategies for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in the general population (CoV-Surv Study): a structured summary of a study protocol for a cluster-randomised, two-factorial controlled trial.在普通人群中进行 SARS-CoV-2 监测的四种不同策略的有效性和成本效益(CoV-Surv 研究):一项关于集群随机、双因素对照试验的研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Jan 8;22(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04982-z.
3
Modelling of hypothetical SARS-CoV-2 point-of-care tests on admission to hospital from A&E: rapid cost-effectiveness analysis.急诊科入院时假设的 SARS-CoV-2 即时检测模型:快速成本效益分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Mar;25(21):1-68. doi: 10.3310/hta25210.
4
Cost-effectiveness of a whole-area testing pilot of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections with lateral flow devices: a modelling and economic analysis study.使用侧向流动设备对无症状 SARS-CoV-2 感染进行全区域检测试点的成本效益:建模和经济分析研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Sep 22;22(1):1190. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08511-3.
5
Cost-effectiveness of intensive care for hospitalized COVID-19 patients: experience from South Africa.南非新冠肺炎住院患者重症监护的成本效益分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jan 22;21(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06081-4.
6
Cost-Effectiveness of Baricitinib Compared With Standard of Care: A Modeling Study in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19 in the United States.巴瑞替尼与标准治疗相比的成本效益:美国 COVID-19 住院患者的建模研究。
Clin Ther. 2021 Nov;43(11):1877-1893.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2021.09.016. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
7
Cost-Effectiveness of Universal Asymptomatic Preoperative SARS-CoV-2 Polymerase Chain Reaction Screening: A Cost-Utility Analysis.普遍无症状术前SARS-CoV-2聚合酶链反应筛查的成本效益:一项成本效用分析。
Clin Infect Dis. 2024 Jan 25;78(1):57-64. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad463.
8
Authors' response: Occupation and SARS-CoV-2 infection risk among workers during the first pandemic wave in Germany: potential for bias.作者回复:在德国首次大流行期间,工人的职业与 SARS-CoV-2 感染风险:潜在的偏见。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2022 Sep 1;48(7):588-590. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.4061. Epub 2022 Sep 25.
9
Safety and Efficacy of Imatinib for Hospitalized Adults with COVID-19: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.COVID-19 住院成人患者使用伊马替尼的安全性和疗效:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Oct 28;21(1):897. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04819-9.
10
A Model-Based Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Long-Acting Monoclonal Antibody (Tixagevimab and Cilgavimab: Evusheld) Preventive Treatment for High-Risk Populations Against SARS-CoV-2 in Korea.基于模型的长效单克隆抗体(替沙格韦单抗和西加韦单抗:埃武泽单抗)在韩国针对 SARS-CoV-2 高危人群预防治疗的成本效益分析。
J Korean Med Sci. 2023 Aug 14;38(32):e250. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e250.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the Usefulness of Population-Wide COVID-19 Testing in the Omicron Era: Insights from a German Model.评估奥密克戎时代全人群新冠病毒检测的效用:来自德国模型的见解
Gesundheitswesen. 2024 Dec;86(12):776-782. doi: 10.1055/a-2328-4165. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
2
Predictive models for health outcomes due to SARS-CoV-2, including the effect of vaccination: a systematic review.预测 SARS-CoV-2 导致的健康结果的模型,包括疫苗接种的效果:系统评价。
Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 16;13(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02411-1.
3
Diagnostics and treatments of COVID-19: two-year update to a living systematic review of economic evaluations.

本文引用的文献

1
Symptomatic, Presymptomatic, and Asymptomatic Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in a University Student Population, August-November 2020.2020 年 8 月至 11 月期间,大学生群体中 SARS-CoV-2 的有症状、有前驱症状和无症状传播。
Public Health Rep. 2022 Sep-Oct;137(5):1023-1030. doi: 10.1177/00333549221110300. Epub 2022 Jul 16.
2
Transmission dynamics and epidemiological characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant infections in Guangdong, China, May to June 2021.2021 年 5 月至 6 月期间中国广东地区 SARS-CoV-2 Delta 变异株感染的传播动态和流行病学特征。
Euro Surveill. 2022 Mar;27(10). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2022.27.10.2100815.
3
新型冠状病毒肺炎的诊断与治疗:对经济评估的实时系统评价的两年更新
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Nov 16;14:1291164. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1291164. eCollection 2023.
4
Cost-effectiveness of interventions for the prevention and control of COVID-19: Systematic review of 85 modelling studies.预防和控制 COVID-19 的干预措施的成本效益:85 项建模研究的系统评价。
J Glob Health. 2022 Jun 15;12:05022. doi: 10.7189/jogh.12.05022.
Smart investment of virus RNA testing resources to enhance Covid-19 mitigation.
优化病毒 RNA 检测资源的投资以加强新冠疫情缓解
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 30;16(11):e0259018. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259018. eCollection 2021.
4
Diagnostic accuracy of rapid antigen tests in asymptomatic and presymptomatic close contacts of individuals with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection: cross sectional study.快速抗原检测对确诊的SARS-CoV-2感染个体无症状和症状前密切接触者的诊断准确性:横断面研究
BMJ. 2021 Jul 27;374:n1676. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n1676.
5
Long COVID and Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS)-A Systemic Review and Comparison of Clinical Presentation and Symptomatology.长新冠和肌痛性脑脊髓炎/慢性疲劳综合征(ME/CFS)——系统回顾及临床表型和症状学比较。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Apr 26;57(5):418. doi: 10.3390/medicina57050418.
6
Quantification of the Tradeoff between Test Sensitivity and Test Frequency in a COVID-19 Epidemic-A Multi-Scale Modeling Approach.新冠疫情中检测敏感性与检测频率权衡的量化——一种多尺度建模方法
Viruses. 2021 Mar 11;13(3):457. doi: 10.3390/v13030457.
7
Rapid, point-of-care antigen and molecular-based tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.用于 SARS-CoV-2 感染诊断的快速、即时抗原和基于分子的检测。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 24;3(3):CD013705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013705.pub2.
8
Risk of mortality in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern 202012/1: matched cohort study.202012/1 感染关注的 SARS-CoV-2 变异株的患者的死亡率风险:匹配队列研究。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 9;372:n579. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n579.
9
Cost-effectiveness of Interventions for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome or Myalgic Encephalomyelitis: A Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations.慢性疲劳综合征或肌痛性脑脊髓炎干预措施的成本效益:经济评估的系统评价。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2021 Jul;19(4):473-486. doi: 10.1007/s40258-021-00635-7. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
10
The clinical and economic value of a successful shutdown during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in Germany.德国在新冠疫情期间成功实施封锁措施的临床和经济价值。
Q Rev Econ Finance. 2022 May;84:502-509. doi: 10.1016/j.qref.2020.10.007. Epub 2020 Oct 14.