• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新型口服头孢菌素BMY-28100的体外和体内评价

In vitro and in vivo evaluations of BMY-28100, a new oral cephalosporin.

作者信息

Tomatsu K, Ando S, Masuyoshi S, Kondo S, Hirano M, Miyaki T, Kawaguchi H

机构信息

Bristol-Myers Research Institute, Ltd., Tokyo Research Center, Japan.

出版信息

J Antibiot (Tokyo). 1987 Aug;40(8):1175-83. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.40.1175.

DOI:10.7164/antibiotics.40.1175
PMID:3500158
Abstract

A new semisynthetic oral cephalosporin, BMY-28100, was evaluated for in vitro and in vivo antibacterial activities in comparison with cefaclor and cephalexin. BMY-28100 showed in vitro activity 3- and 10-fold more potent than that of cefaclor against Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae, respectively. BMY-28100 was slightly better than cefaclor and about 4 times more active than cephalexin against Haemophilus influenzae and Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Proteus mirabilis were comparably susceptible to BMY-28100 and cefaclor. The bactericidal activity of BMY-28100 against S. aureus, E. coli and P. mirabilis was equal to or twice as high as MIC value, which was similar to that of cefaclor. The stability of BMY-28100 against penicillinases was nearly comparable to that of cefaclor, whereas cefaclor was somewhat unstable to cephalosporinases. BMY-28100 was about twice as active as cefaclor against three Gram-positive bacterial infections. BMY-28100 was also more potent against infections of H. influenzae and P. mirabilis, but slightly less active against E. coli Juhl than cefaclor. Blood level parameters of BMY-28100 were significantly superior to those of cefaclor and slightly better than cephalexin in mice and rats. The urinary recovery of BMY-28100 was somewhat higher and comparable to that of cefaclor and cephalexin, respectively. BMY-28100 was more stable than cefaclor in human and calf sera at 37 degrees C.

摘要

一种新型半合成口服头孢菌素BMY - 28100,与头孢克洛和头孢氨苄相比,对其体外和体内抗菌活性进行了评估。BMY - 28100对金黄色葡萄球菌和肺炎链球菌的体外活性分别比头孢克洛强3倍和10倍。在针对流感嗜血杆菌和淋病奈瑟菌方面,BMY - 28100略优于头孢克洛,活性约为头孢氨苄的4倍。大肠杆菌、肺炎克雷伯菌和奇异变形杆菌对BMY - 28100和头孢克洛的敏感性相当。BMY - 28100对金黄色葡萄球菌、大肠杆菌和奇异变形杆菌的杀菌活性等于或高于最低抑菌浓度值的两倍,这与头孢克洛相似。BMY - 28100对青霉素酶的稳定性与头孢克洛几乎相当,而头孢克洛对头孢菌素酶有些不稳定。在针对三种革兰氏阳性菌感染方面,BMY - 28100的活性约为头孢克洛的两倍。BMY - 28100对流感嗜血杆菌和奇异变形杆菌感染也更有效,但对大肠杆菌Juhl的活性略低于头孢克洛。在小鼠和大鼠中,BMY - 28100的血药浓度参数明显优于头孢克洛,略优于头孢氨苄。BMY - 28100的尿回收率略高,分别与头孢克洛和头孢氨苄相当。在37℃下,BMY - 28100在人血清和小牛血清中比头孢克洛更稳定。

相似文献

1
In vitro and in vivo evaluations of BMY-28100, a new oral cephalosporin.新型口服头孢菌素BMY-28100的体外和体内评价
J Antibiot (Tokyo). 1987 Aug;40(8):1175-83. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.40.1175.
2
BMY-28100, a new oral cephalosporin: antimicrobial activity against nearly 7,000 recent clinical isolates, comparative potency with other oral agents, and activity against beta-lactamase producing isolates.新型口服头孢菌素BMY-28100:对近7000株近期临床分离菌株的抗菌活性、与其他口服制剂的相对效价以及对产β-内酰胺酶分离菌株的活性
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1988 Jan;9(1):11-26. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(88)90056-9.
3
BMY 28100, a new oral cephalosporin.BMY 28100,一种新型口服头孢菌素。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1987 Feb;31(2):238-43. doi: 10.1128/AAC.31.2.238.
4
In vitro activity and beta-lactamase stability of the oral cephalosporin BMY-28100.口服头孢菌素BMY-28100的体外活性及β-内酰胺酶稳定性
Eur J Clin Microbiol. 1987 Oct;6(5):559-63. doi: 10.1007/BF02014246.
5
In vitro activity of BMY-28100, a new oral cephalosporin.新型口服头孢菌素BMY - 28100的体外活性
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1987 Apr;31(4):653-6. doi: 10.1128/AAC.31.4.653.
6
In vitro and in vivo antibacterial properties of FK 027, a new orally active cephem antibiotic.新型口服活性头孢烯抗生素FK 027的体外和体内抗菌特性
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1984 Jan;25(1):98-104. doi: 10.1128/AAC.25.1.98.
7
Comparative antibacterial activity of a new oral cephalosporin, BMY-28100.新型口服头孢菌素BMY-28100的抗菌活性比较
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1987 Mar;31(3):480-3. doi: 10.1128/AAC.31.3.480.
8
[In vitro activity of cefaclor (author's transl)].头孢克洛的体外活性(作者译)
Infection. 1979;7 Suppl 6:518-26. doi: 10.1007/BF01659726.
9
In vitro and in vivo antibacterial activity of KT3777, a new orally active carbacephem.新型口服活性碳头孢烯KT3777的体外和体内抗菌活性
J Antibiot (Tokyo). 1989 Dec;42(12):1844-53. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.42.1844.
10
In vitro activity of Ro 15-8074 and Ro 19-5247 in comparison to cefaclor and cefalexin.
Infection. 1987 Mar-Apr;15(2):122-4. doi: 10.1007/BF01650213.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative microbiological activity and pharmacokinetics of cefprozil.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1994 Oct;13(10):839-45. doi: 10.1007/BF02111350.
2
Cefprozil. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential.头孢丙烯。对其抗菌活性、药代动力学特性及治疗潜力的综述。
Drugs. 1993 Feb;45(2):295-317. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199345020-00008.
3
beta-Lactamase stability and in vitro activity of oral cephalosporins against strains possessing well-characterized mechanisms of resistance.β-内酰胺酶稳定性及口服头孢菌素对具有明确耐药机制菌株的体外活性。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1989 Aug;33(8):1313-7. doi: 10.1128/AAC.33.8.1313.
4
Inability of cephalothin testing to predict cefprozil susceptibility.头孢噻吩试验无法预测头孢丙烯的敏感性。
J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Nov;29(11):2643-7. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.11.2643-2647.1991.