• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

家庭护理者的存在性困扰:意义建构干预的范围综述。

Existential distress in family caregivers: scoping review of meaning-making interventions.

机构信息

School of Nursing, College of Health Professions & Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA

Department of Patient Care Research, Froedtert & the Medical College of Wisconsin, Froedtert Hospital, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2024 Jan 8;13(e3):e676-e685. doi: 10.1136/spcare-2023-004448.

DOI:10.1136/spcare-2023-004448
PMID:37604657
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11040498/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Family and friend caregivers often feel overwhelmed by and ill-prepared for their responsibilities. Many feel helpless living with uncertainty about the outcome of the patient's illness, which leads to existential distress. Supportive care interventions that address existential distress by promoting meaning and purpose buffer the negative effects of caregiver burden and promote resilience and growth. The purpose of this scoping review is to describe the depth and breadth of available interventions targeting caregiver existential distress.

METHODS

We followed the Joanna Briggs Institute's scoping review methods and applied the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension checklist. SCOPUS, Ovid MEDLINE and PsycINFO databases were searched for interventions that targeted existential distress by promoting meaning-making, spiritual well-being, post-traumatic growth and/or benefit finding for caregivers of seriously ill adult patients.

RESULTS

We screened 1377 titles/abstracts and 42 full-text articles. Thirty-one articles (28 unique studies) met inclusion criteria. Most interventions were designed for caregivers supporting patients with cancer (n=14) or patients receiving palliative care (n=9). Promising interventions included Meaning-Centered Psychotherapy for Cancer Caregivers, Meaning-Based Intervention for Patients and their Partners, Legacy Intervention for Family Enactment, Family Participatory Dignity Therapy and Existential Behavioural Therapy. More than half of the studies (n=20, 64%) were in the feasibility/acceptability/pilot stage of intervention testing.

CONCLUSION

Large randomised controlled trials with more diverse samples of caregivers are needed. Future research should explore the impact of delivering meaning-making interventions to caregivers throughout the illness trajectory. Developing strategies for scaling up and conducting cost analyses will narrow the research and practice gap for meaning-making interventions.

摘要

目的

家属和朋友护理人员常常感到负担过重,对自己的职责准备不足。许多人对患者病情的结果感到无助和不确定,这导致了存在性困扰。通过促进意义和目的来缓解存在性困扰的支持性护理干预措施,可以缓冲护理人员负担的负面影响,促进韧性和成长。本研究旨在描述针对护理人员存在性困扰的现有干预措施的深度和广度。

方法

我们遵循了 Joanna Briggs 研究所的范围综述方法,并应用了系统综述和荟萃分析扩展报告的首选报告项目清单。在 SCOPUS、Ovid MEDLINE 和 PsycINFO 数据库中,搜索了通过促进意义建构、精神幸福感、创伤后成长和/或对重病成年患者的护理人员进行利益发现来针对存在性困扰的干预措施。

结果

我们筛选了 1377 篇标题/摘要和 42 篇全文文章。31 篇文章(28 项独立研究)符合纳入标准。大多数干预措施是为支持癌症患者(n=14)或接受姑息治疗的患者(n=9)的护理人员而设计的。有前途的干预措施包括癌症护理人员的意义中心心理治疗、患者及其伴侣的意义干预、家庭实施干预、家庭参与尊严治疗和存在行为治疗。超过一半的研究(n=20,64%)处于干预测试的可行性/可接受性/试点阶段。

结论

需要进行更大规模的随机对照试验,以纳入更多样化的护理人员样本。未来的研究应该探索在整个疾病过程中为护理人员提供意义建构干预措施的影响。制定扩大规模和进行成本分析的策略将缩小意义建构干预措施的研究和实践差距。

相似文献

1
Existential distress in family caregivers: scoping review of meaning-making interventions.家庭护理者的存在性困扰:意义建构干预的范围综述。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2024 Jan 8;13(e3):e676-e685. doi: 10.1136/spcare-2023-004448.
2
Effectiveness of meaning-centered interventions on existential distress and mental health outcomes in cancer survivors and their family caregivers: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.意义中心干预对癌症幸存者及其家庭照顾者存在性痛苦和心理健康结果的有效性:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2025 Feb;22(1):e12752. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12752. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
3
Meaning-Centered Psychotherapy for Cancer Caregivers (MCP-C): Rationale and Overview.癌症护理者意义中心心理治疗(MCP-C):原理与概述
Palliat Support Care. 2015 Dec;13(6):1631-41. doi: 10.1017/S1478951515000450. Epub 2015 May 22.
4
The feasibility and acceptability of a chaplain-led intervention for caregivers of seriously ill patients: A Caregiver Outlook pilot study.针对重症患者照料者的由牧师主导的干预措施的可行性与可接受性:一项照料者展望试点研究。
Palliat Support Care. 2016 Oct;14(5):456-67. doi: 10.1017/S1478951515001248. Epub 2015 Oct 29.
5
Supporting Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Family Caregivers: A Pilot Study of Nurse-Led Meaning-Centered Psychotherapy for Cancer Caregivers.支持造血干细胞移植家庭照顾者:一项针对癌症照顾者的护士主导的意义中心心理治疗的试点研究。
Psychooncology. 2025 Apr;34(4):e70142. doi: 10.1002/pon.70142.
6
Can senior volunteers deliver reminiscence and creative activity interventions? Results of the legacy intervention family enactment randomized controlled trial.老年志愿者能否提供回忆与创意活动干预?遗产干预家庭演绎随机对照试验的结果。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 Oct;48(4):590-601. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.11.012. Epub 2014 Mar 22.
7
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
8
A novel Family Dignity Intervention (FDI) for enhancing and informing holistic palliative care in Asia: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.一种用于加强和指导亚洲整体姑息治疗的新型家庭尊严干预措施(FDI):一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2017 Dec 4;18(1):587. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2325-5.
9
Psychosocial interventions for informal caregivers of people living with cancer.针对癌症患者非正式照护者的心理社会干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jun 17;6(6):CD009912. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009912.pub2.
10
Effectiveness of interventions that assist caregivers to support people with dementia living in the community: a systematic review.干预措施对帮助照顾者支持社区中痴呆症患者的有效性:系统评价。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Jun;6(2):137-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2008.00090.x.

引用本文的文献

1
'People ring because they're frightened': findings from a realist evaluation on the impact of timely responsive care at home at the end of life.“人们打电话是因为他们感到害怕”:一项关于临终时在家中获得及时响应护理影响的现实主义评价的结果。
BMC Palliat Care. 2025 Jul 14;24(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01826-y.
2
Post-Acute Transition to Home With Supportive Care (PATHS): A Novel Nurse Practitioner-Led Telehealth Intervention to Improve End-of-Life Oncology Care.急性后期过渡到居家支持性护理(PATHS):一种由执业护士主导的新型远程医疗干预措施,旨在改善临终肿瘤护理。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2025 May;69(5):496-506. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.02.008. Epub 2025 Feb 17.
3
Biography Writing in the Pediatric Palliative Care Context: Review and Feasibility Data.儿科姑息治疗背景下的传记写作:综述与可行性数据
Children (Basel). 2024 Dec 24;12(1):4. doi: 10.3390/children12010004.
4
Benefit Finding and Growth Among Family Caregivers of Individuals With Mental Illness: A Scoping Review.患有精神疾病个体的家庭照顾者的获益发现与成长:一项范围综述
J Fam Nurs. 2025 Feb;31(1):16-30. doi: 10.1177/10748407241309138. Epub 2025 Jan 22.
5
Sustaining Joy in Serious Neurologic Illnesses.在严重神经系统疾病中保持快乐。
Semin Neurol. 2024 Oct;44(5):551-558. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1788725. Epub 2024 Aug 2.
6
Cancer caregivers are primarily motivated by love and sense of duty.癌症护理者的主要动机是爱和责任感。
Health Psychol Res. 2024 Mar 17;12:92643. doi: 10.52965/001c.92643. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of the usability, accessibility and acceptability for a family support intervention (Family-Focused Support Conversation) for end of life care discharge planning from hospital: A participatory learning and action research study.对医院临终关怀出院计划的家庭支持干预措施(以家庭为中心的支持对话)的可用性、可及性和可接受性进行评估:一项参与性学习与行动研究。
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2021 Jan 23;3:100022. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2021.100022. eCollection 2021 Nov.
2
Family-oriented dignity therapy for patients with lung cancer undergoing chemotherapy: How does it work better?面向家庭的尊严疗法对接受化疗的肺癌患者的作用:它如何能更好地发挥作用?
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2022 Nov 17;10(1):100168. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2022.100168. eCollection 2023 Jan.
3
Experience of application of the meaning-centered psychotherapy to Japanese bereaved family of patients with cancer - A mixed-method study.应用意义中心心理疗法于日本癌症患者丧亲家庭的经验:混合方法研究。
Palliat Support Care. 2023 Aug;21(4):594-602. doi: 10.1017/S147895152200150X.
4
There is nothing informal about caregiving.照顾工作没有任何非正式可言。
Palliat Support Care. 2022 Oct;20(5):621-622. doi: 10.1017/S1478951522001092.
5
Meaning-Centered Psychotherapy for Cancer Caregivers: A pilot trial among caregivers of patients with glioblastoma multiforme.意义中心心理疗法在癌症照护者中的应用:胶质母细胞瘤患者照护者的试点试验。
Transl Behav Med. 2022 Aug 17;12(8):841-852. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibac043.
6
Development and feasibility of culturally sensitive family-oriented dignity therapy for Chinese patients with lung cancer undergoing chemotherapy.针对接受化疗的中国肺癌患者的具有文化敏感性的家庭导向尊严疗法的开发与可行性研究
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2022 Apr 30;9(9):100078. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2022.100078. eCollection 2022 Sep.
7
Effects of family-oriented dignity therapy on dignity, depression and spiritual well-being of patients with lung cancer undergoing chemotherapy: A randomised controlled trial.以家庭为导向的尊严疗法对肺癌化疗患者尊严、抑郁及精神健康的影响:一项随机对照试验
Int J Nurs Stud. 2022 May;129:104217. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104217. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
8
A qualitative exploration of the feasibility and acceptability of Meaning-Centered Psychotherapy for Cancer Caregivers.对癌症照顾者实施以意义为中心的心理疗法的可行性和可接受性的定性探索。
Palliat Support Care. 2022 Oct;20(5):623-629. doi: 10.1017/S1478951521002030.
9
Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Efficacy of Dignity Therapy in Patients With Early Stage Dementia and Their Family. A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.尊严疗法对早期痴呆患者及其家属的可行性、可接受性和初步疗效:一项随机对照试验的试点研究
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Dec 24;12:795813. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.795813. eCollection 2021.
10
The Effectiveness of Group Hope Therapy Training on the Quality of Life and Meaning of Life in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis and Their Family Caregivers.团体希望疗法训练对多发性硬化症患者及其家庭照顾者生活质量和生活意义的有效性。
Iran J Psychiatry. 2021 Jul;16(3):260-270. doi: 10.18502/ijps.v16i3.6251.