Komlenac Nikola, Stockinger Lisa, Vogler Tanja, Hochleitner Margarethe
Gender Medicine Unit, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 23;12:782618. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.782618. eCollection 2021.
The Work-Family Conflict and Family-Work Conflict Scale (WFC & FWC Scale) is a questionnaire commonly used to assess conflicts that arise when required time devotion and strain for work obligations interfere with family responsibilities (work-family conflict) and conflicts that arise when family responsibilities interfere with work responsiblities (family work conflict). Past reports on the psychometric properties and recommendations for application of the WFC & FWC Scale mostly rely on samples from the United States. The current study is the first to report psychometric properties of a German-language version of the WFC & FWC Scale, including invariance analyses across women and men, and test-retest reliabilities. The analysis of the latent structure that was based on responses from 274 employes (77.0% women, 23.0% men) of a medical university in Austria revealed that the bifactor model had a satisfactory fit with the data. Configural and metric invariance indicated a similar factor structure and similar meaning in women and men. However, scalar invariance cannot be assumed. Thus, differences in scale scores between women and men might not adequately reflect level differences in the underlying latent factor. High internal consistencies and high test-retest reliabilities offer evidence for adequate reliability. Additionally, evidence for convergent (links to work stress and relationship satisfaction) and divergent validity (no links to career ambition) were found. In summary, the current study offers adequate evidence for validity and reliability of a German-language version of the WFC & FWC Scale.
工作-家庭冲突与家庭-工作冲突量表(WFC & FWC量表)是一种常用问卷,用于评估因工作义务所需的时间投入和压力干扰家庭责任时产生的冲突(工作-家庭冲突),以及家庭责任干扰工作职责时产生的冲突(家庭-工作冲突)。以往关于WFC & FWC量表心理测量特性及应用建议的报告大多基于美国的样本。本研究首次报告了德语版WFC & FWC量表的心理测量特性,包括男女之间的不变性分析和重测信度。基于奥地利一所医科大学274名员工(77.0%为女性,23.0%为男性)的回答进行的潜在结构分析表明,双因素模型与数据拟合良好。构型不变性和度量不变性表明男女具有相似的因素结构和相似的含义。然而,不能假定标量不变性。因此,男女之间量表得分的差异可能无法充分反映潜在潜在因素的水平差异。高内部一致性和高重测信度为充分的信度提供了证据。此外,还发现了收敛效度(与工作压力和关系满意度的联系)和区分效度(与职业抱负无联系)的证据。总之,本研究为德语版WFC & FWC量表的效度和信度提供了充分的证据。