Kong Xiangyun, Zhu Yong, Pu Lianmei, Meng Shuai, Zhao Lihan, Zeng Wei, Sun Weiyan, Wu Guangming, Li Hong
Department of General Medicine, Beijing Luhe Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Dec 23;8:774109. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.774109. eCollection 2021.
The real-world treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) often involves the prescription of new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) using dosing both lower and higher than recommended guidelines. Our study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of non-recommended dosage of NOACs in AF patients. A systematic search was performed for relevant studies across multiple electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Clinical Trials Registry) from inception to May 1, 2021. Multicenter randomized trials and observational studies were selected with key reporting measures for inclusion involved efficacy outcomes including stroke or systemic thromboembolism along with safety endpoints assessing major or clinically relevant bleeding events. A total of 11 eligible studies were included involving 48,648 patients receiving recommended dose of NOACs and 50,116 patients receiving non-recommended dosage. Compared to AF patients treated with recommended dose regimens, administration of low dose of NOACs was associated with higher risk of stroke/systemic embolism (RR = 1.24, 95% CI 1.14-1.35, < 0.00001), but without reducing bleeding risk (RR = 1.18, 95% CI 0.91-1.53, = 0.21) and a higher risk of all-cause mortality (RR = 1.58, 95% CI 1.25-1.99, = 0.0001). Moreover, high dose of NOACs was associated with higher risk of stroke and systemic embolism efficacy (RR = 1.71, 95% CI 1.06-2.76, = 0.03) and a non-significant trend to a greater risk of major or clinically relevant bleeding (RR = 1.57, 95% CI 0.96-2.58, = 0.07). AF patients treated with low dose of NOACs showed equivalent safety but with worse efficacy compared with recommended dose. High dose of NOACs was not superior to recommended dose regimens in preventing stroke/systemic embolism outcomes in AF patients.
心房颤动(AF)的实际治疗通常涉及使用低于和高于推荐指南剂量的新型口服抗凝药(NOACs)进行处方。我们的研究旨在评估非推荐剂量的NOACs在AF患者中的疗效和安全性。对多个电子数据库(PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆、临床试验注册中心)从开始到2021年5月1日的相关研究进行了系统检索。选择多中心随机试验和观察性研究,纳入的关键报告指标包括疗效结果,如中风或全身性血栓栓塞,以及评估主要或临床相关出血事件的安全性终点。共纳入11项符合条件的研究,涉及48648例接受推荐剂量NOACs的患者和50116例接受非推荐剂量的患者。与接受推荐剂量方案治疗的AF患者相比,低剂量NOACs治疗与中风/全身性栓塞风险较高相关(RR = 1.24,95%CI 1.14 - 1.35,< 0.00001),但未降低出血风险(RR = 1.18,95%CI 0.91 - 1.53, = 0.21),且全因死亡率风险较高(RR = 1.58,95%CI 1.25 - 1.99, = 0.0001)。此外,高剂量NOACs与中风和全身性栓塞疗效风险较高相关(RR = 1.71,95%CI 1.06 - 2.76, = 0.03),且主要或临床相关出血风险有增加的非显著趋势(RR = 1.57,95%CI 0.96 - 2.58, = 0.07)。与推荐剂量相比,低剂量NOACs治疗的AF患者安全性相当,但疗效较差。高剂量NOACs在预防AF患者中风/全身性栓塞结局方面并不优于推荐剂量方案。