Murphy Ben, Carroll Patrick, McColgan Rosie, Molloy Alan, O'Shea Kieran
Department of Trauma & Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Trauma Case Rep. 2021 Dec 23;37:100599. doi: 10.1016/j.tcr.2021.100599. eCollection 2022 Feb.
A young male presented to a nearby hospital with a left shoulder dislocation after an alleged kickboxing injury. The patient reported worrying clinical findings including excruciating pain and absent sensation distally. Reduction was successful but his shoulder re-dislocated shortly after. His reported symptoms worsened and he was transferred to our institution. Imaging findings were not immediately concerning and he went to theatre the next day for an examination under anaesthetic. His shoulder was re-located easily and an immobiliser applied. Less than an hour later, the patient managed to re-dislocate his shoulder in recovery. He was subjected to another general anaesthetic and successful reduction. He absconded the following day after being declined multiple and increasing doses of opioid analgesia. He re-presented three weeks later with similar clinical findings but a different mechanism of injury. Further exploration of his collateral history revealed that he had been using a false identity. He had presented to all hospitals in our city within the previous 6 months. Once confronted, he did not return to these hospitals. He was also capable of self-relocating his shoulder. This case bore a striking resemblance to a case described by Warren in 2000 of a young lady with an apparently dislocated shoulder presenting to multiple city hospitals looking for analgesia and general anaesthetics. We wished to highlight the diagnostic and ethical challenges associated with these patients. They are vulnerable and so a high index of clinical suspicion is needed on the part of the surgeon to avoid unnecessary interventions. Effective communication between orthopaedic departments is a key recommendation from this case to mitigate risk of harm to these patients.
一名年轻男性在据称因踢拳受伤后,前往附近医院就诊,诊断为左肩脱位。患者报告了令人担忧的临床症状,包括剧痛和远端感觉缺失。复位成功,但不久后他的肩膀再次脱位。他报告的症状加重,随后被转至我们机构。影像学检查结果当时并无立即令人担忧之处,次日他接受了麻醉下检查。他的肩膀很容易就被复位了,并使用了固定器。不到一小时后,患者在恢复过程中再次自行脱位。他再次接受全身麻醉并成功复位。在多次拒绝给予越来越高剂量的阿片类镇痛药后,他于次日擅自离院。三周后,他再次前来就诊,临床表现相似,但受伤机制不同。进一步询问他的旁系病史发现,他一直使用假身份。在过去6个月内,他曾前往我市所有医院就诊。一经 confronted,他便不再返回这些医院。他还能够自行复位肩膀。该病例与沃伦在2000年描述的一个病例惊人地相似,该病例是一名年轻女性,明显肩部脱位,前往多家城市医院寻求镇痛和全身麻醉。我们希望强调与这些患者相关的诊断和伦理挑战。他们很脆弱,因此外科医生需要高度的临床怀疑指数,以避免不必要的干预。从这个病例中得出的一个关键建议是,骨科各科室之间进行有效的沟通,以降低对这些患者造成伤害的风险。 (注:原文中“Once confronted”的“confronted”翻译可能不准确,这里根据语境猜测翻译为“一经 confronted”,不太明确准确意思,需结合更多背景信息。)