Habermeyer P, Jung D, Ebert T
Unfallchirurg. 1998 May;101(5):328-41; discussion 327. doi: 10.1007/s001130050278.
The purpose of this paper is to outline the treatment protocol for the first time traumatic anterior shoulder dislocator, with options including conservative, arthroscopic and open surgical treatment. Regarding the subclassification of the first time traumatic anterior dislocater, it is imparitive to differentiate between the unidirectional dislocator with and without hyperlaxity. This subclassification takes into account the structural quality of the stabilizing ligamentous structures of the glenohumeral capsule. The patient with hyperelastic ligaments exhibit elastic deformation of the glenohumeral ligaments at the time of dislocation and thus, sustain less interstitial structural damage to the ligament. Therefore, these patients benefit from non-operative treatment. There are extrinsic and intrinsic factors which determine the outcome of the primary traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation. Extrinsic factors are those that are not related to changes in the shoulder morphology. The most important extrinsic factor is the age of the patient at the time of injury. The younger the patient at the time of injury the greater the risk of recurrence. As a rule, those patients 25 years of age or less, at the time of initial injury are less likely to spontaneously stabilize without surgical intervention, than they are to develop recurrence. Secondly, the type and level of sport participation is related to recurrence. Although the severity of the trauma can not be quantified, it certainly has an influence on recurrence. Immobilization remains controversial. A rehabilitation program is more likely to be successful in atraumatic instability. Patient compliance is important regardless of the type of treatment selected. Intrinsic factors include injury to the various anatomic structures about the shoulder, occurring at the time of primary anterior shoulder dislocation. A deep Hill Sachs lesion is more likely to result in recurrence secondary to both the impaction of the bone, as well as, the reduction of the area of articular surface. A displaced bony Bankart is a highly unstable situation secondary to the loss of the butress to retain the humeral head. In contrast to a Hill Sachs lesion or a bony Bankart, a concomittent fracture of the greater tuberosity is unlikely to result in recurrent dislocation. Isolated laberal detachment is not related to recurrence, but a complete disruption of the laberal ligament complex is highly correlated with recurrence. A rare subluxation erecta, as a special form of traumatic inferior instability, has a high recurrence rate. With increasing age there is a higher risk of concomittent rotator cuff tear. In most situations surgical repair of the rotator cuff tear results in resolution of the instability. The essential issue in determining the treatment protocol is to define concomittent hyperlaxity in the injured shoulder. Concomittent hyperlaxity precludes initial surgical treatment. The orthopedic surgeon treating the patient at the time of injury needs to design a concise treatment protocol for the patient based on the assessment of the extrinsic and intrinsic factors. An unreducable shoulder dislocation or associated vascular injury requires emergent intervention. Absolute indications for surgical treatment include: persistent dislocation, bony Bankart, a grossly displaced greater tuberosity fracture, and rupture of the subscapularis tendon. Surgical stabilization of primary anterior traumatic dislocation is indicated if the following strict criteria are met: adequate trauma, no self reduction, unidirectional instability without hyperlaxity, Hill Sachs lesion, age below 26 years, high level of sport activity and the special situation of luxatio erecta. Post primary stabilization is indicated for persistent subluxation, subjective instability or demonstrated pathologic instability tests. Rotator cuff tears due to traumatic dislocation in the elderly population require surgical repair.
本文旨在首次概述创伤性前肩关节脱位的治疗方案,包括保守治疗、关节镜治疗和开放手术治疗等选择。关于首次创伤性前脱位的亚分类,区分有和没有关节过度松弛的单向脱位至关重要。这种亚分类考虑了盂肱关节囊稳定韧带结构的结构质量。韧带过度松弛的患者在脱位时盂肱韧带会发生弹性变形,因此韧带的间质结构损伤较小。所以,这些患者从非手术治疗中获益。有外在和内在因素决定了原发性创伤性前肩关节脱位的结果。外在因素是那些与肩部形态变化无关的因素。最重要的外在因素是受伤时患者的年龄。受伤时患者越年轻,复发风险越高。一般来说,初次受伤时年龄在25岁及以下的患者,不进行手术干预而自发稳定的可能性比复发的可能性小。其次,运动参与的类型和水平与复发有关。虽然创伤的严重程度无法量化,但它肯定会影响复发。固定治疗仍存在争议。康复计划在非创伤性不稳定中更有可能成功。无论选择何种治疗方式,患者的依从性都很重要。内在因素包括初次前肩关节脱位时肩部周围各种解剖结构的损伤。较深的希尔-萨克斯损伤更有可能导致复发,这是由于骨的撞击以及关节面面积的减少。移位的骨性Bankart损伤是一种高度不稳定的情况,因为失去了支撑肱骨头的结构。与希尔-萨克斯损伤或骨性Bankart损伤不同,大结节的合并骨折不太可能导致复发性脱位。孤立的盂唇分离与复发无关,但盂唇韧带复合体的完全断裂与复发高度相关。一种罕见的肩关节垂直半脱位,作为创伤性下不稳定的一种特殊形式,复发率很高。随着年龄的增加,合并肩袖撕裂的风险更高。在大多数情况下,手术修复肩袖撕裂可解决不稳定问题。确定治疗方案的关键问题是确定受伤肩部是否合并关节过度松弛。合并关节过度松弛排除了初始手术治疗。在受伤时治疗患者的骨科医生需要根据对外在和内在因素的评估为患者设计一个简洁的治疗方案。不可复位的肩关节脱位或相关血管损伤需要紧急干预。手术治疗的绝对指征包括:持续性脱位、骨性Bankart损伤、严重移位的大结节骨折以及肩胛下肌腱断裂。如果满足以下严格标准,则表明需要对原发性前创伤性脱位进行手术稳定治疗:足够的创伤、无自行复位、无关节过度松弛的单向不稳定、希尔-萨克斯损伤、年龄低于26岁、高水平的体育活动以及肩关节垂直半脱位的特殊情况。初次稳定治疗后适用于持续性半脱位、主观不稳定或经证实的病理性不稳定试验。老年人群因创伤性脱位导致的肩袖撕裂需要手术修复。