• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

紫杉醇和卡铂与紫杉醇和异环磷酰胺治疗子宫或卵巢癌肉瘤患者的随机 III 期试验:NRG 肿瘤学试验。

Randomized Phase III Trial of Paclitaxel and Carboplatin Versus Paclitaxel and Ifosfamide in Patients With Carcinosarcoma of the Uterus or Ovary: An NRG Oncology Trial.

机构信息

Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO.

NRG Oncology, Clinical Trial Development Division, Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 2022 Mar 20;40(9):968-977. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.02050. Epub 2022 Jan 10.

DOI:10.1200/JCO.21.02050
PMID:35007153
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8937015/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This phase III randomized trial (NCT00954174) tested the null hypothesis that paclitaxel and carboplatin (PC) is inferior to paclitaxel and ifosfamide (PI) for treating uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Adults with chemotherapy-naïve UCS or ovarian carcinosarcoma (OCS) were randomly assigned to PC or PI with 3-week cycles for 6-10 cycles. With 264 events in patients with UCS, the power for an overall survival (OS) hybrid noninferiority design was 80% for a null hazard ratio (HR) of 1.2 against a 13% greater death rate on PI with a type I error of 5% for a one-tailed test.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 536 patients with UCS and 101 patients with OCS, with 449 and 90 eligible, respectively. Primary analysis was on patients with UCS, distributed as follows: 40% stage I, 6% stage II, 31% stage III, 15% stage IV, and 8% recurrent. Among eligible patients with UCS, PC was assigned to 228 and PI to 221. PC was not inferior to PI. The median OS was 37 versus 29 months (HR = 0.87; 90% CI, 0.70 to 1.075; < .01 for noninferiority, > .1 for superiority). The median progression-free survival was 16 versus 12 months (HR = 0.73; = < 0.01 for noninferiority, < .01 for superiority). Toxicities were similar, except that more patients in the PC arm had hematologic toxicity and more patients in the PI arm had confusion and genitourinary hemorrhage. Among 90 eligible patients with OCS, those in the PC arm had longer OS (30 25 months) and progression-free survival (15 10 months) than those in the PI arm, but with limited precision, these differences were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

PC was not inferior to the active regimen PI and should be standard treatment for UCS.

摘要

目的

本 III 期随机试验(NCT00954174)检验了紫杉醇联合卡铂(PC)劣于紫杉醇联合异环磷酰胺(PI)治疗子宫癌肉瘤(UCS)的无效假设。

方法

新辅助化疗未接受的 UCS 或卵巢癌肉瘤(OCS)成年患者随机分配至 PC 或 PI 组,每 3 周治疗 6-10 个周期。UCS 患者有 264 个事件,在 HR 为 1.2(PI 组死亡率增加 13%)、单侧检验α值为 0.05 时,OS 混合非劣效设计的效能为 80%。

结果

本研究纳入了 536 例 UCS 和 101 例 OCS 患者,分别有 449 例和 90 例符合条件。主要分析对象为 UCS 患者,分布如下:Ⅰ期 40%,Ⅱ期 6%,Ⅲ期 31%,Ⅳ期 15%,复发 8%。在符合条件的 UCS 患者中,PC 组 228 例,PI 组 221 例。PC 组未劣效于 PI 组。中位 OS 为 37 个月与 29 个月(HR=0.87;90%CI,0.70 至 1.075;P<.01 表示非劣效性,>0.1 表示优效性)。中位无进展生存期为 16 个月与 12 个月(HR=0.73;P<.01 表示非劣效性,<0.01 表示优效性)。毒性相似,PC 组血液学毒性更多,PI 组意识障碍和泌尿生殖系统出血更多。在 90 例符合条件的 OCS 患者中,PC 组 OS(30 25 个月)和无进展生存期(15 10 个月)均长于 PI 组,但因精度有限,这些差异无统计学意义。

结论

PC 组与活性方案 PI 组相比无劣效性,应作为 UCS 的标准治疗方案。

相似文献

1
Randomized Phase III Trial of Paclitaxel and Carboplatin Versus Paclitaxel and Ifosfamide in Patients With Carcinosarcoma of the Uterus or Ovary: An NRG Oncology Trial.紫杉醇和卡铂与紫杉醇和异环磷酰胺治疗子宫或卵巢癌肉瘤患者的随机 III 期试验:NRG 肿瘤学试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2022 Mar 20;40(9):968-977. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.02050. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
2
Chemotherapy for Uterine Carcinosarcoma with Carboplatin, Ifosfamide and Mesna.卡铂、异环磷酰胺和美司钠治疗子宫癌肉瘤的化疗
Anticancer Res. 2015 Sep;35(9):4841-7.
3
Adjuvant chemotherapy in uterine carcinosarcoma: Comparison of a doublet and a triplet chemotherapeutic regimen.子宫癌肉瘤的辅助化疗:双联化疗方案与三联化疗方案的比较。
Indian J Cancer. 2021 Apr-Jun;58(2):179-184. doi: 10.4103/ijc.IJC_57_19.
4
Phase III trial of ifosfamide with or without paclitaxel in advanced uterine carcinosarcoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study.异环磷酰胺联合或不联合紫杉醇治疗晚期子宫癌肉瘤的III期试验:一项妇科肿瘤学组研究
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Feb 10;25(5):526-31. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.4907.
5
Phase II evaluation of paclitaxel and carboplatin in the treatment of carcinosarcoma of the uterus: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.紫杉醇和卡铂治疗子宫癌肉瘤的 II 期评估:妇科肿瘤学组研究。
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jun 1;28(16):2727-31. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.26.8326. Epub 2010 Apr 26.
6
Comparison of first-line chemotherapy regimens for ovarian carcinosarcoma: a single institution case series and review of the literature.卵巢癌肉瘤一线化疗方案的比较:单中心病例系列及文献复习。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Feb 9;18(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4082-6.
7
A retrospective assessment of outcomes of chemotherapy-based versus radiation-only adjuvant treatment for completely resected stage I-IV uterine carcinosarcoma.对完全切除的Ⅰ-Ⅳ期子宫癌肉瘤基于化疗与单纯放疗辅助治疗的结局进行回顾性评估。
Gynecol Oncol. 2008 Nov;111(2):249-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.06.035. Epub 2008 Aug 27.
8
Survival outcome of women with stage IV uterine carcinosarcoma who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery.接受新辅助化疗后行手术治疗的IV期子宫癌肉瘤女性患者的生存结局。
J Surg Oncol. 2018 Mar;117(3):488-496. doi: 10.1002/jso.24861. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
9
A phase II trial of paclitaxel and carboplatin in women with advanced or recurrent uterine carcinosarcoma.紫杉醇和卡铂治疗晚期或复发性子宫癌肉瘤的 II 期临床试验。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2011 Apr;21(3):517-22. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0b013e31820da9e2.
10
Paclitaxel-carboplatin for advanced or recurrent carcinosarcoma of the uterus: the Japan Uterine Sarcoma Group and Tohoku Gynecologic Cancer Unit Study.紫杉醇联合卡铂治疗晚期或复发性子宫癌肉瘤:日本子宫肉瘤研究组和东北妇科癌症研究单位的研究
Int J Clin Oncol. 2014 Dec;19(6):1052-8. doi: 10.1007/s10147-013-0658-y. Epub 2014 Jan 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Carcinosarcoma of the Endometrium-Pathology, Molecular Landscape and Novel Therapeutic Approaches.子宫内膜癌肉瘤——病理学、分子格局与新型治疗方法
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jun 26;61(7):1156. doi: 10.3390/medicina61071156.
2
Phase 2 study of Wee1 inhibitor adavosertib in recurrent uterine carcinosarcoma.Wee1抑制剂adavosertib用于复发性子宫癌肉瘤的2期研究。
Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2025 Jun 24;60:101796. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2025.101796. eCollection 2025 Aug.
3
GTSF1 promotes stemness in uterine carcinosarcoma through CCL1-mediated M1 macrophage aggregation.GTSF1通过CCL1介导的M1巨噬细胞聚集促进子宫癌肉瘤的干性。
Am J Cancer Res. 2025 May 25;15(5):2397-2412. doi: 10.62347/MAXH5742. eCollection 2025.
4
Establishment and comparison of three sublines from a human uterine carcinosarcoma cell line, ESCA.从人子宫癌肉瘤细胞系ESCA建立三个亚系并进行比较。
Hum Cell. 2025 Jun 2;38(4):115. doi: 10.1007/s13577-025-01225-8.
5
Unconventional success: Achieving long-term remission with pembrolizumab in recurrent high-grade endometrial carcinosarcoma.非传统的成功:派姆单抗治疗复发性高级别子宫内膜癌肉瘤实现长期缓解
Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2025 Apr 19;59:101748. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2025.101748. eCollection 2025 Jun.
6
Association of ABC Efflux Transporter Genetic Variants and Adverse Drug Reactions and Survival in Patients with Non-Small Lung Cancer.ABC外排转运体基因变异与非小细胞肺癌患者药物不良反应及生存的相关性
Genes (Basel). 2025 Apr 15;16(4):453. doi: 10.3390/genes16040453.
7
Platinum free interval and clinical benefit of the second-line chemotherapy in recurrent uterine and ovarian carcinosarcoma: a retrospective cohort analysis.复发子宫和卵巢癌肉瘤二线化疗的无铂间期及临床获益:一项回顾性队列分析
J Gynecol Oncol. 2025 Jul;36(4):e64. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2025.36.e64. Epub 2025 Mar 23.
8
Surgical staging identifies occult metastases in over 50% of uterine-confined carcinosarcoma.手术分期可发现超过50%局限于子宫的癌肉瘤存在隐匿性转移。
Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2025 Mar 18;58:101722. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2025.101722. eCollection 2025 Apr.
9
Updates and controversies in the management of uterine serous carcinoma and uterine carcinosarcoma.子宫浆液性癌和子宫癌肉瘤治疗的进展与争议
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2025 Mar;35(3):101672. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.101672. Epub 2025 Jan 30.
10
A retrospective study evaluating the effect of trastuzumab addition to carboplatin/paclitaxel on overall survival in patients with advanced-stage HER2/neu-overexpressing uterine serous carcinoma or carcinosarcoma.一项回顾性研究,评估在卡铂/紫杉醇基础上加用曲妥珠单抗对晚期HER2/neu过表达的子宫浆液性癌或癌肉瘤患者总生存期的影响。
BMC Med. 2025 Feb 21;23(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-03916-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Progress in endometrial cancer: Contributions of the former Gynecologic Oncology Group.子宫内膜癌的研究进展:前妇科肿瘤学组的贡献。
Gynecol Oncol. 2020 May;157(2):312-322. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.01.012. Epub 2020 Feb 1.
2
Cancer statistics, 2020.癌症统计数据,2020 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 Jan;70(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21590. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
3
Targeting human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) in gynecologic malignancies.针对妇科恶性肿瘤中的人表皮生长因子受体 2(HER2)。
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Feb;32(1):57-64. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000599.
4
Clinically relevant molecular subtypes and genomic alteration-independent differentiation in gynecologic carcinosarcoma.妇科癌肉瘤中有临床意义的分子亚型和与基因组改变无关的分化。
Nat Commun. 2019 Oct 31;10(1):4965. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12985-x.
5
HER2 testing of gynecologic carcinosarcomas: tumor stratification for potential targeted therapy.妇科癌肉瘤的 HER2 检测:潜在靶向治疗的肿瘤分层。
Mod Pathol. 2020 Jan;33(1):118-127. doi: 10.1038/s41379-019-0358-x. Epub 2019 Sep 2.
6
Molecular Basis of Tumor Heterogeneity in Endometrial Carcinosarcoma.子宫内膜癌肉瘤中肿瘤异质性的分子基础
Cancers (Basel). 2019 Jul 9;11(7):964. doi: 10.3390/cancers11070964.
7
Uterine Cancer Incidence and Mortality - United States, 1999-2016.美国 1999-2016 年子宫癌发病率和死亡率。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018 Dec 7;67(48):1333-1338. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6748a1.
8
Prognostic factors impacting survival in early stage uterine carcinosarcoma.影响早期子宫癌肉瘤生存的预后因素。
Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Jan;152(1):31-37. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.10.034. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
9
Randomized Phase II Trial of Carboplatin-Paclitaxel Versus Carboplatin-Paclitaxel-Trastuzumab in Uterine Serous Carcinomas That Overexpress Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2/neu.随机Ⅱ期临床试验:卡铂-紫杉醇对比卡铂-紫杉醇-曲妥珠单抗治疗人表皮生长因子受体 2/neu 过表达的子宫浆液性癌。
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jul 10;36(20):2044-2051. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.76.5966. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
10
Trends of uterine carcinosarcoma in the United States.美国子宫癌肉瘤的趋势。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2018 Mar;29(2):e22. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2018.29.e22. Epub 2018 Jan 5.