Suppr超能文献

同时应对生态退化和贫困挑战:来自中国北方荒漠化地区的证据。

Simultaneously tackling ecological degradation and poverty challenges: Evidence from desertified areas in northern China.

机构信息

School of Land Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China; Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen 1350, Denmark.

School of Land Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China; Key Laboratory of Land Consolidation and Rehabilitation, Ministry of Natural Resources, Beijing 100083, China.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2022 Apr 1;815:152927. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.152927. Epub 2022 Jan 7.

Abstract

Developing sustainable environmental policies in ecologically fragile and deeply impoverished areas is a global challenge. Desertification has caused serious environmental and socioeconomic issues. It is important to reveal the mechanisms of environmental policies when balancing desertification control and poverty alleviation. This study used comparative analysis and trend analysis methods and assessed the policy performances of national key ecological functional areas (NKEFAs) for desertified areas in northern China from 2005 to 2020. Two factors have been fully analyzed: desertification and poverty. The results indicate that adaptive adjustments of the NKEFA policy play an essential role in eradicating the vicious cycle of "degradation-poverty". Although the improvements in ecological quality were not obvious, its trends changed substantially from decreasing to increasing. The proportions of desert control and socioeconomic improvement were more optimistic in the NKEFAs than in non-NKEFAs (e.g., expansion: 0.41% < 4.67%; improvement: 7.63% > 5.48%). The overall ecological benefit of the adjustment was 0.25%, which experienced a trend of declining first and then rising. The ecological and socioeconomic benefits of the first adjustment were - 0.96% per year and 2.1% per year, respectively. Then, the ecological and socioeconomic benefits of the second policy adjustment were 2.51% per year and 3.2% per year, respectively. The potential mechanism of the NKEFA policy effect is adaptive adjustments that are based on the complexity and variability of the issue. The results contribute to simultaneously tackling ecological degradation and poverty challenges and facilitating sustainable development.

摘要

在生态脆弱和深度贫困地区制定可持续的环境政策是一个全球性的挑战。沙漠化已经造成了严重的环境和社会经济问题。在平衡沙漠化治理和减贫方面,揭示环境政策的机制非常重要。本研究采用比较分析和趋势分析方法,评估了 2005 年至 2020 年中国北方荒漠化地区国家重点生态功能区(NKEFA)的政策绩效。充分分析了两个因素:沙漠化和贫困。结果表明,NKEFA 政策的适应性调整在消除“退化-贫困”恶性循环方面发挥了重要作用。虽然生态质量的改善不明显,但趋势从下降到上升有了显著变化。NKEFAs 中的沙漠治理和社会经济改善比例比非 NKEFAs 更为乐观(例如,扩张:0.41%<4.67%;改善:7.63%>5.48%)。调整的总体生态效益为 0.25%,经历了先降后升的趋势。调整的第一年和第二年的生态和社会经济效益分别为每年-0.96%和每年 2.1%,以及每年 2.51%和每年 3.2%。NKEFA 政策效果的潜在机制是基于问题的复杂性和可变性的适应性调整。研究结果有助于同时应对生态退化和贫困挑战,促进可持续发展。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验