Suppr超能文献

国家政策对初始阿片类镇痛药高危处方率的影响。

The effect of state policies on rates of high-risk prescribing of an initial opioid analgesic.

机构信息

RAND Corporation Pittsburgh, PA, USA; University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, USA.

RAND Corporation, Arlington, VA, USA.

出版信息

Drug Alcohol Depend. 2022 Feb 1;231:109232. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.109232. Epub 2021 Dec 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Multiple state policies, such as prescription drug monitoring programs (PDMPs) and duration limits, have been implemented to decrease high-risk opioid prescribing. Studies demonstrate that many policies decrease certain opioid prescribing behaviors, but few examine their intended effects on the targeted high-risk prescribing practices, nor disentangle the effects of concurrent state or federal policies likely to influence those practices.

METHODS

Forty-one million initial prescriptions for new opioid episodes from 2007 to 2018 were identified using national pharmacy claims. We identified high-risk initial prescriptions, defined as >7 days' supply, average daily MME >90, or concurrent with benzodiazepines and estimated three multivariable logistic regression models to assess the association between policies and outcomes controlling for patient, prescriber, and county characteristics.

RESULTS

Initial prescriptions for >7 days declined from 23.8% in 2007 to 14.9% in 2018, associated with mandatory and interoperable PDMPs and prescription duration limits but not other policies examined. Initial prescriptions with daily MME > 90 declined from 13.2% to 1.9%, associated with pain management clinic laws but not consistently with other policies. Initial prescriptions concurrent with benzodiazepines declined only modestly from 6.9% to 6.5%, associated with pain management clinic laws but not other policies examined.

CONCLUSIONS

The opioid policy environment has changed rapidly with a range of different policies being implemented addressing high-risk prescribing. PDMP laws mandating prescriber use and pain clinic laws both appear efficacious but decrease different types of high-risk opioid prescribing. New policies should be considered in light of the prevalence of the problem being addressed.

摘要

背景

为了减少高危阿片类药物处方,已经实施了多项州政策,如处方药物监测计划(PDMP)和持续时间限制。研究表明,许多政策减少了某些阿片类药物的处方行为,但很少有研究考察它们对目标高危处方实践的预期效果,也没有理清可能影响这些实践的同时实施的州或联邦政策的影响。

方法

使用全国药房索赔数据,确定了 2007 年至 2018 年 4100 万例新阿片类药物发作的初始处方。我们确定了高危初始处方,定义为 >7 天供应量、平均每日 MME >90 或与苯二氮䓬类药物同时使用,并估计了三个多变量逻辑回归模型,以控制患者、处方者和县特征,评估政策与结果之间的关联。

结果

7 天的初始处方从 2007 年的 23.8%下降到 2018 年的 14.9%,这与强制性和互操作性 PDMP 和处方持续时间限制有关,但与其他研究的政策无关。每日 MME >90 的初始处方从 13.2%下降到 1.9%,与疼痛管理诊所法律有关,但与其他政策不一致。与苯二氮䓬类药物同时使用的初始处方仅略有下降,从 6.9%下降到 6.5%,与疼痛管理诊所法律有关,但与其他研究的政策无关。

结论

阿片类药物政策环境发生了快速变化,实施了一系列不同的政策来解决高危处方问题。要求医生使用 PDMP 的法律和疼痛诊所法律似乎都有效,但减少了不同类型的高危阿片类药物处方。应该根据所解决问题的普遍性考虑新政策。

相似文献

1
The effect of state policies on rates of high-risk prescribing of an initial opioid analgesic.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2022 Feb 1;231:109232. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.109232. Epub 2021 Dec 28.
2
State pain management clinic policies and county opioid prescribing: A fixed effects analysis.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 Nov 1;216:108239. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108239. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
5
Effects of mandatory prescription drug monitoring program (PDMP) use laws on prescriber registration and use and on risky prescribing.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019 Jun 1;199:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.02.010. Epub 2019 Mar 22.
6
Did prescribing laws disproportionately affect opioid dispensing to Black patients?
Health Serv Res. 2022 Jun;57(3):482-496. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13968. Epub 2022 Mar 20.
8
Controlled Substance Prescribing Patterns--Prescription Behavior Surveillance System, Eight States, 2013.
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2015 Oct 16;64(9):1-14. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6409a1.

引用本文的文献

1
An updated view on the influence of initial opioid prescription characteristics on long-term opioid use among opioid naïve patients.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2024 Dec 1;265:112463. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2024.112463. Epub 2024 Oct 24.
2
High-risk use of prescription opioids among patients treated for alcohol problems in New York State. A repeated cross-sectional study, 2005-2018.
Drug Alcohol Depend Rep. 2024 Aug 27;12:100278. doi: 10.1016/j.dadr.2024.100278. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
High-Dose Opioid Prescribing in Individuals with Acute Pain: Assessing the Effects of US State Opioid Policies.
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Nov;39(14):2689-2697. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08947-9. Epub 2024 Jul 19.
4
A Longitudinal Multivariable Analysis: State Policies and Opioid Dispensing in Medicare Beneficiaries Undergoing Surgery.
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Nov;39(15):2942-2951. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08888-3. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
5
Disparities in access but not outcomes: Medicaid versus non-Medicaid patients in multidisciplinary chronic pain rehabilitation.
Disabil Rehabil. 2024 Dec;46(25):6114-6121. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2024.2321326. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
7
Prescription Opioid Dose Reductions and Potential Adverse Events: a Multi-site Observational Cohort Study in Diverse US Health Systems.
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 May;39(6):1002-1009. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08459-y. Epub 2023 Nov 6.
8
Prescription drug monitoring programs use mandates and prescription stimulant and depressant quantities.
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jul 11;23(1):1326. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16256-9.
9
An Exploratory Analysis of Differential Prescribing of High-Risk Opioids by Insurance Type Among Patients Seen by the Same Clinician.
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 May;38(7):1681-1688. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08025-6. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
10
Association of a State Prescribing Limits Policy with Opioid Prescribing and Long-term Use: an Interrupted Time Series Analysis.
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Jun;38(8):1862-1870. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07991-7. Epub 2023 Jan 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Opioid Tapering Practices-Time for Reconsideration?
JAMA. 2021 Aug 3;326(5):388-389. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.11118.
6
Methodological Challenges and Proposed Solutions for Evaluating Opioid Policy Effectiveness.
Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol. 2021 Mar;21(1):21-41. doi: 10.1007/s10742-020-00228-2. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
7
Systematic Evaluation of State Policy Interventions Targeting the US Opioid Epidemic, 2007-2018.
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e2036687. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.36687.
8
Can policy affect initiation of addictive substance use? Evidence from opioid prescribing.
J Health Econ. 2021 Mar;76:102397. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2020.102397. Epub 2020 Dec 13.
9
Laws limiting prescribing and dispensing of opioids in the United States, 1989-2019.
Addiction. 2021 Jul;116(7):1817-1827. doi: 10.1111/add.15359. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
10
Promoting Patient-Centeredness in Opioid Deprescribing: a Blueprint for De-implementation Science.
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Dec;35(Suppl 3):972-977. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06254-7. Epub 2020 Nov 3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验