• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于自然的公民科学作为改善城市地区人类健康的一种机制。

Nature-Based Citizen Science as a Mechanism to Improve Human Health in Urban Areas.

机构信息

UniSA Clinical and Health Science, University of South Australia, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.

School of Natural Sciences, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 55, Hobart, TAS 7001, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 22;19(1):68. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010068.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph19010068
PMID:35010326
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8751081/
Abstract

The world is becoming increasingly urbanised, impacting human interactions with natural environments (NEs). NEs take a number of forms, ranging from pristine, modified, to built NEs, which are common in many urban areas. NEs may include nature-based solutions, such as introducing nature elements and biological processes into cities that are used to solve problems created by urbanisation. Whilst urbanisation has negative impacts on human health, impacting mental and physical wellbeing through a number of mechanisms, exposure to NEs may improve human health and wellbeing. Here, we review the mechanisms by which health can be improved by exposure to NEs, as explained by Stress Reduction Theory, Attention Restoration Theory, and the 'Old Friends'/biodiversity hypothesis. Such exposures may have physiological and immunological benefits, mediated through endocrine pathways and altered microbiota. Citizen Science, which often causes exposure to NEs and social activity, is being increasingly used to not only collect scientific data but also to engage individuals and communities. Despite being a named component of scientific and environmental strategies of governments, to our knowledge, the intrinsic health benefits of Citizen Science in NEs do not form part of public health policy. We contend that Citizen Science programs that facilitate exposure to NEs in urban areas may represent an important public health policy advance.

摘要

世界正变得日益城市化,这影响了人类与自然环境(NE)的相互作用。NE 有多种形式,从原始的、经过改造的到建成的 NE 都很常见于许多城市地区。NE 可能包括基于自然的解决方案,例如将自然元素和生物过程引入城市,以解决城市化带来的问题。虽然城市化对人类健康有负面影响,通过多种机制影响心理和身体健康,但接触 NE 可能会改善人类健康和幸福感。在这里,我们根据压力减轻理论、注意力恢复理论和“老朋友”/生物多样性假说,回顾了通过接触 NE 改善健康的机制。这种接触可能通过内分泌途径和改变微生物群产生生理和免疫益处。公民科学经常会导致接触 NE 和社会活动,它越来越多地被用于不仅收集科学数据,还用于吸引个人和社区。尽管公民科学是政府科学和环境战略中的一个命名组成部分,但据我们所知,公民科学在 NE 中的内在健康益处并未构成公共卫生政策的一部分。我们认为,促进城市地区接触 NE 的公民科学计划可能代表着公共卫生政策的重要进步。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fd0/8751081/45e2545f6742/ijerph-19-00068-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fd0/8751081/45e2545f6742/ijerph-19-00068-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fd0/8751081/45e2545f6742/ijerph-19-00068-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Nature-Based Citizen Science as a Mechanism to Improve Human Health in Urban Areas.基于自然的公民科学作为改善城市地区人类健康的一种机制。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 22;19(1):68. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010068.
2
Implementing co-created citizen science in five environmental epidemiological studies in the CitieS-Health project.在 CitieS-Health 项目的五个环境流行病学研究中实施共同创建的公民科学。
Environ Res. 2024 Jan 1;240(Pt 2):117469. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2023.117469. Epub 2023 Oct 21.
3
A Scoping Review of Citizen Science Approaches in Chronic Disease Prevention.公民科学在慢性病预防中的应用:范围综述
Front Public Health. 2022 May 9;10:743348. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.743348. eCollection 2022.
4
Unveiling the urban colonization of the Asian water monitor () across its distribution range using citizen science.利用公民科学揭示亚洲水巨蜥(Varanus salvator)在其分布范围内的城市栖息地。
PeerJ. 2024 Aug 22;12:e17357. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17357. eCollection 2024.
5
Citizen science and social innovation as citizen empowerment tools to address urban health challenges: The case of the urban health citizen laboratory in Barcelona, Spain.公民科学和社会创新作为增强公民权能的工具,以应对城市健康挑战:以西班牙巴塞罗那城市健康公民实验室为例。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 13;19(3):e0298749. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298749. eCollection 2024.
6
Evaluating the potential of urban areas for bat conservation with citizen science data.利用公民科学数据评估城市地区蝙蝠保护的潜力。
Environ Pollut. 2022 Mar 15;297:118785. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118785. Epub 2021 Dec 31.
7
The co-benefits of biodiversity citizen science for well-being and nature relatedness.生物多样性公民科学对幸福感和自然关联性的共同效益。
Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2024 May;16(2):515-536. doi: 10.1111/aphw.12502. Epub 2023 Oct 24.
8
Interrupting pathways to health inequities in citizen science health research.在公民科学健康研究中阻断通向健康不平等的途径。
Health Promot Int. 2022 Jun 23;37(Supplement_2):ii21-ii34. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daac032.
9
The Role of Citizen Science in Promoting Health Equity.公民科学在促进健康公平中的作用。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2022 Apr 5;43:215-234. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-090419-102856. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
10
Leveraging citizen science for monitoring urban forageable plants.利用公民科学监测城市可食用植物。
Gigascience. 2024 Jan 2;13. doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giae007.

引用本文的文献

1
: findings on Mexican fireflies from an 8-year virtual citizen science project.: 来自一个为期 8 年的虚拟公民科学项目的墨西哥萤火虫调查结果。
PeerJ. 2024 Sep 18;12:e18141. doi: 10.7717/peerj.18141. eCollection 2024.
2
Perspectives on Inequity and Health Disparities in Chile and Their Relationship to Microbial Ecology.智利的不平等和健康差距及其与微生物生态学的关系的观点。
mSystems. 2022 Oct 26;7(5):e0149621. doi: 10.1128/msystems.01496-21. Epub 2022 Sep 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Urbanisation reduces the abundance and diversity of airborne microbes - but what does that mean for our health? A systematic review.城市化降低了空气中微生物的丰度和多样性,但这对我们的健康意味着什么?一项系统评价。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Oct 10;738:140337. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140337. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
2
Urban-associated diseases: Candidate diseases, environmental risk factors, and a path forward.城市相关疾病:候选疾病、环境风险因素及前进道路。
Environ Int. 2019 Dec;133(Pt A):105187. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105187. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
3
A randomized controlled trial and pragmatic analysis of the effects of volunteering on the health and well-being of older people.
一项关于志愿服务对老年人健康和幸福影响的随机对照试验和实用分析。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2020 Apr;32(4):711-721. doi: 10.1007/s40520-019-01241-3. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
4
The unmet support needs of carers of older Australians: prevalence and mental health.照顾老年澳大利亚人者的未满足支持需求:流行率和心理健康。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2018 Dec;30(12):1849-1860. doi: 10.1017/S104161021800042X. Epub 2018 May 25.
5
What makes nature-based interventions for mental health successful?是什么让基于自然的心理健康干预措施取得成功?
BJPsych Int. 2017 Nov 1;14(4):82-85. doi: 10.1192/s2056474000002063. eCollection 2017 Nov.
6
Are green cities healthy and equitable? Unpacking the relationship between health, green space and gentrification.绿色城市是否健康且公平?剖析健康、绿色空间与 gentrification 之间的关系。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2017 Nov;71(11):1118-1121. doi: 10.1136/jech-2017-209201. Epub 2017 Aug 19.
7
Out-of-pocket healthcare expenditure and chronic disease - do Australians forgo care because of the cost?自付医疗费用与慢性病——澳大利亚人会因为费用而放弃治疗吗?
Aust J Prim Health. 2017 Apr;23(1):15-22. doi: 10.1071/PY16005.
8
Cities and Mental Health.城市与心理健康。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2017 Feb 24;114(8):121-127. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2017.0121.
9
Can volunteering in later life reduce the risk of dementia? A 5-year longitudinal study among volunteering and non-volunteering retired seniors.晚年从事志愿活动能否降低患痴呆症的风险?一项针对参与志愿活动和未参与志愿活动的退休老年人的为期5年的纵向研究。
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 16;12(3):e0173885. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173885. eCollection 2017.
10
Innate Immunity and Asthma Risk in Amish and Hutterite Farm Children.阿米什和哈特派农场儿童的先天免疫与哮喘风险
N Engl J Med. 2016 Aug 4;375(5):411-421. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1508749.