Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan.
Sendai City Mental Health and Welfare Center, Sendai 980-0845, Japan.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 24;19(1):192. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010192.
We examined the differences in the posttraumatic growth (PTG) free descriptions from clusters of Fukushima residents (evacuation and non-evacuation zones) who experienced the Great East Japan Earthquake, and the relationship between "recovery from radiation anxiety" and the PTG-free description classification in these regions. A mail survey was conducted in August 2016 among Fukushima residents aged 20-79 years for free descriptions of their PTG. Participants were then divided into the "no anxiety," "recovered from anxiety," and "unrecovered from anxiety" groups based on their "recovery from radiation anxiety." Data from 786 responses were analyzed. The PTG-free descriptions were classified into eight categories. Among those who lived in the evacuation zone versus those in the non-evacuation zone, "relating to others" (non-evacuation zone: 11.9% vs. evacuation zone: 18.4%) and "appreciation of life" (non-evacuation zone: 2.7% vs. evacuation zone: 9.8%) were significantly higher, and "increased awareness of disaster prevention" (non-evacuation zone: 20.4% vs. evacuation zone: 8.0%) was significantly lower. In the evacuation zone, "renewed recognition of nuclear issues" was significantly lower than the expected value in the no anxiety group (3.1%) and significantly higher than the expected value in the recovered group (22.9%). Further studies are needed to build support measures and potentially aid in preparing for future disasters.
我们考察了经历东日本大地震的福岛居民(疏散区和非疏散区)创伤后成长(PTG)的自由描述聚类之间的差异,以及这些地区“放射性焦虑的恢复”与 PTG 自由描述分类之间的关系。2016 年 8 月,我们对 20-79 岁的福岛居民进行了一项关于 PTG 的自由描述的邮件调查。然后,根据他们的“放射性焦虑的恢复”,将参与者分为“无焦虑”、“焦虑已恢复”和“焦虑未恢复”三组。对 786 份回复的数据进行了分析。PTG 自由描述被分为八个类别。与居住在疏散区的居民相比,居住在非疏散区的居民在“与他人的关系”(非疏散区:11.9%对疏散区:18.4%)和“欣赏生命”(非疏散区:2.7%对疏散区:9.8%)方面明显更高,而“提高对灾害预防的认识”(非疏散区:20.4%对疏散区:8.0%)明显更低。在疏散区,“对核问题的重新认识”显著低于无焦虑组的预期值(3.1%),显著高于已恢复组的预期值(22.9%)。需要进一步研究以建立支持措施,并可能有助于为未来的灾难做准备。