Department of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology and Health Studies "Sapienza", University of Rome, Via degli Apuli 1, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Department of Humanities, Social Sciences and Cultural Industries, University of Parma, 43125 Parma, Italy.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 30;19(1):386. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010386.
(1) Background: Maladaptive daydreaming (MD) is a concept that describes a significant imaginary activity that replaces human engagement and/or interferes with academic, interpersonal, or vocational functioning. We explored the interaction between attachment style, reflective functioning (RF), and the narrative dimension of MD. (2) Methods: 414 adults completed an online survey, including socio-demographic variables, the 16-item Maladaptive Daydreaming Scale, the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised, Relationship Questionnaire, and Reflective Functioning Questionnaire. Participants were asked to write a short description of the most representative episodes of their daydreams. Eighty-four participants were identified as maladaptive daydreamers (MDers). (3) Results: A set of -tests between MDers and non-MDers group showed differences in attachment dimensions, RF, and linguistic measures. A linear regression model with Global Severity Index (GSI) of the revised Symptom Checklist-90 as the dependent variable, and psychological scales as independent variables showed that the MD score was the strongest predictor of GSI. Regarding differences between the two groups in linguistic measures, the MDers showed more use of reflection and sensory-somatic words, and a smaller number of affective words. (4) Conclusions: These results support the idea that the MD is a process connected to psychopathological mechanisms, probably to a sub-symbolic activation, and to dysfunctional self-other relational patterns that are difficult to integrate.
(1) 背景:适应不良白日梦(MD)是一个描述一种重要的想象活动的概念,这种活动取代了人类的参与和/或干扰了学术、人际关系或职业功能。我们探讨了依恋风格、反思功能(RF)和 MD 的叙事维度之间的相互作用。(2) 方法:414 名成年人完成了一项在线调查,包括社会人口统计学变量、16 项适应不良白日梦量表、症状清单-90 修订版、关系问卷和反思功能问卷。要求参与者写一段他们白日梦的最具代表性的片段的简短描述。84 名参与者被确定为适应不良白日梦者(MDers)。(3) 结果:一组 MDers 和非 MDers 组之间的 t 检验显示在依恋维度、RF 和语言测量方面存在差异。以修订后的症状清单-90 的总严重度指数(GSI)为因变量,以心理量表为自变量的线性回归模型表明,MD 得分是 GSI 的最强预测因子。关于两组在语言测量方面的差异,MDers 表现出更多的反思和感觉-躯体词汇的使用,以及较少的情感词汇。(4) 结论:这些结果支持 MD 是与心理病理机制相关的过程的观点,可能与亚符号激活以及难以整合的功能失调的自我-他人关系模式有关。