• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Jehovah's Witnesses and Their Compliance with Regulations on Smoking and Blood Treatment.耶和华见证人与他们对吸烟和血液处理规定的遵守。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 30;19(1):387. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010387.
2
Children of Jehovah's Witnesses and adolescent Jehovah's Witnesses: what are their rights?耶和华见证人的儿童和青少年耶和华见证人:他们有哪些权利?
Arch Dis Child. 2005 Jul;90(7):715-9. doi: 10.1136/adc.2004.067843.
3
Refusal of potentially life-saving blood transfusions by Jehovah's Witnesses: should doctors explain that not all JWs think it's religiously required?耶和华见证人拒绝接受可能挽救生命的输血:医生是否应解释并非所有耶和华见证人都认为这是宗教所要求的?
J Med Ethics. 2000 Oct;26(5):299-301. doi: 10.1136/jme.26.5.299.
4
Medical confidentiality and the protection of Jehovah's Witnesses' autonomous refusal of blood.医疗保密与耶和华见证者自主拒绝输血的保护
J Med Ethics. 2000 Oct;26(5):381-6. doi: 10.1136/jme.26.5.381.
5
Between Autonomy and Paternalism: Attitudes of Nursing Personnel Towards Jehovah's Witnesses' Refusal of Blood Transfusion.在自主与家长主义之间:护理人员对耶和华见证人拒绝输血的态度。
Int J Public Health. 2023 Aug 3;68:1606291. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2023.1606291. eCollection 2023.
6
Patterns of care in Jehovah's Witnesses patients with solid tumours and lymphoma. Jehovah's Witness 患者中实体瘤和淋巴瘤的护理模式。
Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2019 Apr;2(2):e1148. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.1148. Epub 2018 Oct 26.
7
Jehovah's Witnesses in the emergency department: what are their rights?急诊科中的耶和华见证人:他们有哪些权利?
Emerg Med J. 2005 Dec;22(12):869-71. doi: 10.1136/emj.2004.023382.
8
Bioethics of the refusal of blood by Jehovah's Witnesses: Part 3. A proposal for a don't-ask-don't-tell policy.耶和华见证人的拒输血生物伦理学:第三部分。关于“不问不说”政策的提议。
J Med Ethics. 1999 Dec;25(6):463-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.25.6.463.
9
Bioethics of the refusal of blood by Jehovah's Witnesses: Part 1. Should bioethical deliberation consider dissidents' views?耶和华见证人的拒输血行为的生物伦理学:第一部分。生物伦理学考量应纳入异议者的观点吗?
J Med Ethics. 1998 Aug;24(4):223-30. doi: 10.1136/jme.24.4.223.
10
Jehovah's Witnesses and autonomy: honouring the refusal of blood transfusions.耶和华见证人及其自主权:尊重拒绝输血。
J Med Ethics. 2012 Nov;38(11):652-6. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100802. Epub 2012 Jul 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of post-decompressive haematuria in rapid versus gradual bladder decompression in patients with chronic urinary retention.慢性尿潴留患者快速与缓慢膀胱减压后减压性血尿的比较。
J West Afr Coll Surg. 2024 Jul-Sep;14(3):249-254. doi: 10.4103/jwas.jwas_5_24. Epub 2024 May 24.
2
Everyday Cardiac Surgery in Jehovah's Witnesses of Typically Advanced Age: Clinical Outcome and Matched Comparison.老年耶和华见证人的日常心脏手术:临床结果及匹配对照
J Clin Med. 2023 Aug 3;12(15):5110. doi: 10.3390/jcm12155110.
3
Factors contributing to the low number of blood donors among employed residents in Oshatumba village, Namibia.纳米比亚奥沙坦巴村就业居民献血人数少的原因。
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2023 Apr 24;15(1):e1-e8. doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v15i1.3680.

本文引用的文献

1
Religiosity and Attitudes towards Health, Disease, Death and the Use of Stimulants among Jehovah's Witnesses.耶和华见证人的宗教信仰与他们对健康、疾病、死亡和兴奋剂使用的态度。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 11;18(10):5049. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18105049.
2
Blood transfusions and Jehovah's Witnesses.
Tex Med. 1989 Apr;85(4):57-9.
3
Operationalizing the theory of planned behavior.实施计划行为理论
Res Nurs Health. 1991 Apr;14(2):137-44. doi: 10.1002/nur.4770140208.

耶和华见证人与他们对吸烟和血液处理规定的遵守。

Jehovah's Witnesses and Their Compliance with Regulations on Smoking and Blood Treatment.

机构信息

Department of Labor Law and Social Welfare Law, Faculty of Law, Comenius University, 810 00 Bratislava, Slovakia.

Department of Community and Occupational Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 AV Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 30;19(1):387. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010387.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph19010387
PMID:35010645
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8751198/
Abstract

Jehovah's Witnesses (JWs) are known as a religious group compliant with the national laws in the case of smoking, but not-compliant when it comes to blood treatment. Their beliefs prevent them from taking part in a blood transfusion, which is widely included in standard methods of a life-saving treatment. The aim of this study was to compare the behavior of JWs regarding their approach to blood treatment and to smoking in relation to legal regulations in the field of health. We measured JWs' compliance with health laws regarding blood treatment and smoking (the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control-FCTC). We used the concept of a semi-autonomous social field by Moore and the theory of planned behavior developed by Ajzen. Our findings show that in the case of JWs, the group rules often prevail over state rules contained in generally-binding legislation. In the case of smoking, this means that they seem compliant to the FCTC and to their group rules. In the case of blood treatment, it seems that they are breaking the national rules, because of their group rules. Breaking the latter can result in exclusion from the JWs community. JWs are compliant with national laws as long as these are congruent with their own group rules. If this is not the case, the group influence is very strong and the fear of exclusion from the JW group is often greater than the potential negative health consequences in real life.

摘要

耶和华见证人(Jehovah's Witnesses,简称 JW)被认为是一个在吸烟问题上遵守国家法律的宗教团体,但在血液治疗方面却不遵守规定。他们的信仰使他们无法接受输血,而输血在广泛的救命治疗方法中被广泛采用。本研究旨在比较 JW 对血液治疗和吸烟的态度与卫生领域法律规定之间的行为。我们衡量了 JW 对血液治疗和吸烟的卫生法律的遵守情况(《烟草控制框架公约》)。我们使用了摩尔的半自治社会领域概念和阿杰恩的计划行为理论。我们的研究结果表明,在 JW 群体中,群体规则往往优先于一般立法中包含的国家规则。在吸烟方面,这意味着他们似乎遵守了《烟草控制框架公约》和他们的群体规则。在血液治疗方面,他们似乎违反了国家规则,因为他们的群体规则。违反后者可能导致被 JW 社区排斥。只要国家法律与他们自己的群体规则一致,JW 就会遵守国家法律。如果情况并非如此,那么群体的影响力就非常强大,而对被 JW 群体排斥的恐惧往往大于现实生活中潜在的负面健康后果。